- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
5 comments
Like most things with Microsoft it is probably skipping the first version, I read somewhere it doesn't sit very well on the wrist and even in the top picture you can see it isn't quite right.
I've got one. I've been comparing it with my Garmin Edge on daily bike rides for the last week.
Distance and speed match pretty well - which is to be expected since both devices use GPS (albeit the Garmin being supplemented by a wheel speed sensor).
However I have to say I'm disappointed with the heart rate monitor on the Band. Microsoft made big claims about the accuracy prior to its launch, but reading around on various forums they seem to be backing down a bit now. My Garmin tracks my heart rate pretty accurately via the chest strap. At lower BPMs the Band is broadly similar to the Garmin, but as my heart rate increases so does the discrepancy. My typical commute will see a peak of around 160BPM - the Band has me peaking at 180. Since both devices attempt to calculate calories used, and both devices have the same age/height/weight properties entered, the heart rate discrepancy also manifests as a massive difference in the estimated calorie consumption. My Garmin estimates I use around 500 on my morning commute, whereas the Band puts it at 780 - that's over 50% more. If I was trying to lose weight via a calorie-controlled diet, I'd need a better approximation than that.
I'll carry on using the Band day-to-day, as there are some interesting functions, and I'm keen to see what else Microsoft has in store for it. But I don't see it replacing my Garmin any time soon.
All the reviews i saw of this suggested that it just plain isnt wearable. Bit of a bugger for wearable tech that!
........plus, as mentioned in a review I saw somewhere (it might even have been here), it does look somewhat like an offender's electronic tag
It's a pity it's not waterproof (and is not that cheap either...).