Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Montana bill banning Lycra and other figure-hugging gear, nipple exposure and naked cycling shelved

Proposed law drawn up in response to naked bike ride last year - critics called it sexist

Plans for a law in Montana that was drawn up in response to a naked bike ride have been shelved following criticism that it would have also criminalised wearing figure-hugging clothing such as cycling gear, swimming trunks and yoga pants in public.

Representative David Moore tabled House Bill 365 on Tuesday, which would have extended the state’s indecent exposure law to include any exposure of the nipples – whether women’s or men’s.

It would also have applied to clothing that “gives the appearance or simulates” someone’s buttocks, genitals, pelvic area, or the female nipple.

However the Judiciary Committee of the Republican led state’s House of Representatives voted to shelve the proposed legislation, meaning there is no prospect of it becoming law during the current term.
It had initially beendrawn up in response to the Bare as you Dare naked bike ride near the University of Montana’s campus in Missoula in August last year.

Despite some local residents’ concerns, the event had been given a permit because city officials were concerned that failing to do so might be interpreted as taking away their right to freedom of expression.

Mr Moore had said that some sports clothing might have been banned under his proposals, but added: “Yoga pants should be illegal in public anyway,” reports the Billings Gazette.

Speaking in support of the bill before it was shelved, he said: “I want Montana to be known as a decent state where people can live within the security of laws and protect their children and associates from degrading and indecent practices.

“I believe this bill is written preserving that reputation.”

Under the state’s existing indecent exposure law, first time offenders face a fine of up to $500 and a maximum of six months in jail, with those penalties increased for repeat offenders.

State representative Virginia Court told Mr Moore that seeking to ban clothing on the grounds it showed the outline or appearance of a woman’s nipple was sexist.

“I think you are kind of being a little prejudiced against women,” she said.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
MNgraveur | 9 years ago
0 likes

It's going to be hard to persuade you, but I swear that everyone over here isn't a complete idiot.

Avatar
Jamminatrix | 9 years ago
0 likes

A widespread ban is outright wrong, but maybe there can be some common ground that not everyone should be wearing yoga pants...

//d3qvyul2tp4j8.cloudfront.net/i/WdSKQ5Y5Gvi.jpg)

Avatar
bikecellar | 9 years ago
0 likes

We train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won't allow them to write "fuck" on their airplanes because it's obscene!

Avatar
Gasman Jim | 9 years ago
0 likes

Yes, I thought the Americans were generally against Sharia-type laws!

Avatar
BobGently | 9 years ago
0 likes

Mid West or Middle East, it can be hard to tell the difference

Avatar
jellysticks | 9 years ago
0 likes

 24  24 What year is this? What exactly is wrong with the human body? Ridiculous

Avatar
Olionabike | 9 years ago
0 likes

Banning sports wear is a sure way to beat the obesity crisis.

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

ha ha I just laugh at those who have such a problem with the human body !

Funniest thing I ever saw was with my child outside covent garden last year and the naked bike ride came through. she just laughed her head off at them and embarrassed ha ha

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

I presume he would ban NFL as those tight leggings or whatever they call them leave little to the imagination. I love the US but boy it creates more than it's fair share of weird people !

Avatar
Leviathan replied to ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes
ianrobo wrote:

I presume he would ban NFL as those tight leggings or whatever they call them leave little to the imagination. I love the US but boy it creates more than it's fair share of weird people !

Down with this sort of thing!

And that not even moving on to the wrestling.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 9 years ago
0 likes

Anyone who thinks that young children are in any way damaged by nudity, child or adult, is an idiot. If you ask me, it's more likely to be the children who are taught that nudity is a bad thing who will be damaged.

Avatar
caaad10 replied to Accessibility for all | 9 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Anyone who thinks that young children are in any way damaged by nudity, child or adult, is an idiot. If you ask me, it's more likely to be the children who are taught that nudity is a bad thing who will be damaged.

Well said, I entirely agree, I would go further and say anyone who is upset by the sight of a human being's form must be unsound of mind and of dubious intent

Avatar
levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes

So basically there would be no sport played in Montana unless the participants are wearing burkas (both sexes). Everyone out in public would have to be enclosed in a tent held away from the body in case there is the merest hint of the human form.

No images either!

And these are the self-proclaimed 'Leaders of the Free World'.

And finally. 'Yoga pants', aren't they just leggings?

Latest Comments