A Sydney, Australia designer has jumped on board the cyclist licensing bandwagon in New South Wales with a design for a helmet that incorporates a machine-readable number plate, and has tried to get a Sydney suburban council to back the idea.
Toby King presented his 'Smart Hat' design to the council of affluent Sydney suburb Mosman on November 11.
The council was asked to support the concept and write to NSW roads minister Duncan Gay requesting a meeting to introduce it to the state government.
As well as a number plate, Mr King's Smart Hat incorporates brake lights, indicators, a visor, a slot for your smartphone, a display and wipers to clear the visor when it rains.
According to Jessica Rapana of the Mosman Daily, Mr King told the meeting: “This is a concept for better road safety. It is not a product or a business, it is a concept design. There are not many features on the current helmets that makes them safe.”
Mr King told road.cc that he's just trying to improve cyclist safety. Smart Hat, he said, is for responsible cycliss whowant to be part of the road user community.
He has at least one Mosman councillor backing him. Councillor Simon Menzies said the Smart Hat would provide a solution for commuter cyclists to be registered and able to showcase their registration number.
“People who use it as a mode of transport should be registered and insured,” Cllr Menzies told the Mosman Daily.
“Every other road user pays for registration and it should not be any different.”
The New South Wales state government is considering licensing for cyclists, and Minister Gay has said he is considering banning cyclists from certain roads in Sydney.
Cllr Menzies said he believed relations between drivers and riders would be better if drivers thought riders could be held accountable for their actions.
“It annoys drivers that cyclists can get away with breaking road rules,” he said.
The council did not pass the motion supporting the Smart Hat, but instead passed an amended motion supporting "concepts which aim to improve safety for cyclists and reduce cycle collisions between vehicles and pedestrians" and encouraging Mr King to "present his Smart Hat concept to the NSW Stay Safe Committee".
As you can see from the above diagram, the Smart Hat has just about every bell and whistle you could possibly imagine. And a few you probably couldn't.
Here's how it all fits together:
Its features include:
Built-in camera and headlight
Indicators
Rear light
Brake light
E-tag (some Sydney motorways require tolls for motor vehicles)
Proximity sensors
Mirrors
Visor
Wiper blades
Smart phone slot
Shock-absorbing chin bar (optional)
Display and processor
License plate holder
The lights, wiper motors, sensors and other electronics will be powered by batteries built into the helmet.
Mr King couldn't say how much he expects the Smart Hat to weigh or cost, though he thought the market would bear a price of about AU$200 or £100.
On his website, Mr King says: "Smart Hat is a concept design to greatly increase rider safety, while also addressing some of the more inflammatory issues between cyclists, pedestrians and road users."
Smart Hat's tagline is 'for Responsible Cyclists'. Mr King explains: "Without accountability, there is no respononsibility. Smart Hat allows a license sign to be attached, identifying the rider to other road users, pedestrians & authorities. Registation is a method for riders to show their riding skills, insure themselves & third parties and welcomed as a responsible user of road & pedestrian environments."
"Smart Hat provides the rider with ultimate safety & comfort."































64 thoughts on “Sydney designer comes up with helmet with licence plate, indicators, windscreen wipers and more”
Well that was embarrassing.
Well that was embarrassing.
Is November 13th the
Is November 13th the Australian equivalent of April fool’s day?
right, off,
right, off, piss
rearrange
Why you are at it why not add a horn, airbag, seatbelt and life vest for when riding past a canal.
My 5 year old could design something similar.
God knows what the outcome would be if you hit the tarmac the wrong way, this would rip your neck off.
holy sh!t
holy sh!t
APMSL…
APMSL…
=))
Oh dear, way to look a
Oh dear, way to look a complete tit.
no kidding…
no kidding…
Numpty
Numpty =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))
I would sooner drive than
I would sooner drive than wear that…
Fecking stupid beyond belief
gazza_d wrote:I would sooner
Maybe that is the designer’s ulterior motive? I can’t imagine there is any other reason to design a cycle helmet that would only appeal to motorists. :/
I’m honestly struggling with
I’m honestly struggling with determining if this is parody or not, it’s like the bastard offspring of kickstarter, the TRL and the daily mail.
(No subject)
:&
Someone smeg head designer’s
Someone smeg head designer’s been watching their Red Dwarf collection in bed again.
no comment.
no comment.
bet its really light and
bet its really light and comfortable.
I wonder if you’ll be able to
I wonder if you’ll be able to sue him for damage that’ll cause to your back from wearing or even caused by accident. Obviously not a cyclist just is a cockwomble
I wish this had happened last
I wish this had happened last week.
The BBC could have offered one to Chris Boardman on live TV.
(No subject)

Was doing okay until the last
Was doing okay until the last picture.
That felled me. Proper coffee over keyboard stuff.
=D> =D> :)) :))
ye see, this is how those
ye see, this is how those Alsop bikes in the early 90’s and cannondale headshock and vittoria sliddyslippy ritmo tyres and bb30 and the smell of neoprene gloves 2 hours into a spin and clip on mudguards…ideas from “designers” NEED to be given to a few cyclists to see if the idea is a ‘good idea lets make it’ or an ‘awe well’
Ahhh no way. Can’t believe I
Ahhh no way. Can’t believe I got taken in by that.
Clicked through to the website. It’s proper parody, and nicely done too.
Reminds me of those christian parody sites like http://www.landoverbaptist.org/
Well played guys :))
Worst kickstarter ever
Worst kickstarter ever
Not only is it victim-blaming
Not only is it victim-blaming stuff (shoving safety responsibility onto the cyclist) but it’s also stunningly dumb!
Anyone who needs this helmet
Anyone who needs this helmet has no business on a bicycle. What sort of twisted geek dreamed it up?
No. Just no.
No. Just no.
Mr King is a bellend.
Mr King is a bellend. =D>
It’s bigger than my car…
It’s bigger than my car…
(No subject)
:H
You don’t need to buy one,
You don’t need to buy one, Blue Peter will show you how to make on from some cereal boxes and sticky backed plastic
Never mind the shite
Never mind the shite hat…..
Yeah right. That works with drivers because they’re always held accountable for their actions….
“Without accountability,
“Without accountability, there is no respononsibility”, apparently.
And yet as ridiculous as it
And yet as ridiculous as it is, I’ve just remembered this chap that lots of us have seen in South London.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuGD_yQ952g#t=100
Looking forward to the neck
Looking forward to the neck injuries that bad boy’s going to cause. B-)
It’s like something out of
It’s like something out of Tron. But reimagined by a complete moron.
More laughable is the apparent support for this. Really glad I don’t cycle in Australia!
(No subject)

might I suggest we get all
might I suggest we get all aussie cyclists to ride topless, it is warm and sunny, then tattoo a number on their backs.
The only helmet here is the
The only helmet here is the designer!
Is it April-1 already?
Is it April-1 already?
Bigfoz wrote:Is it April-1
+1
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
breathe….
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
That’s got the be the most ridiculous thing ever. I wear a helmet, but if you think I’m EVER wearing that you’re on more drugs than US Postal.
Hit anything with the chin impact bar and you’ll be lucky if it doesn’t break your neck in the style of some martial arts film star.
Calm down folks, it’s a joke.
Calm down folks, it’s a joke.
drfabulous0 wrote:Calm down
My first thought was ‘Is this a Chris Morris/Armando Iannucci sort-of-deal?’
My next was ‘NfA’ (Normal for Australia).
drfabulous0 wrote:Calm down
Has it actually been acknowledged anywhere as being a hoax/joke?
It has something missing…..
It has something missing….. a syringe driver for all those performance enhancing drugs X( Or maybe there will be an ‘Armstrong’ signature de-lux version :))
It’s based on those cheese
It’s based on those cheese wedge hats that fans of the Green Bay Packers wear.
why dont car users put their
why dont car users put their phones behind their licence plate? BECAUSE ITS A STUPID THING TO DO.
The Daily Mail has reported
The Daily Mail has reported on it, I do hope they get a few more comments, I love reading those Daily Mail comments 😀
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2832762/Is-bike-helmet-red-light-camera-Futuristic-smart-hat-displays-registration-plate-cyclists.html
bikebot wrote:The Daily Mail
I will never click a dm link but please tell us they are taking it seriously?
joemmo wrote:bikebot
Oh I’m sure road.cc readers would love the DM, it has a whole column of articles going down the side of the page about women wearing very little, with nothing but comments on their body shape and weight.
So here’s how road.cc reported the item again
Now see if you can spot the difference in the DM reporting
bikebot wrote:I love reading
That’s like shooting fish in a barrel. 😉
As the safety of the cyclist

As the safety of the cyclist is paramount in this design, I have another idea.
http://inhabitat.com/activists-show-what-it-would-look-like-if-bikes-took-up-as-much-room-as-cars/
This is needed in Australia,
This is needed in Australia, the cyclists there have obviously caused animosity with their red-light jumping and general poor behavior. NSW should fund this helmet and make it mandatory to make the roads safer and to increase respect between the people of NSW and cyclists.
Good grief, I just read some
Good grief, I just read some of the comments on the Australian site with the original report. Try to imagine an extreme version of the Daily Mail. That’s right, you need to recalibrate the Daily Mail to moderate.
Is there some sort of diplomacy equivalent of an intervention?
Simpson’s fans?
Simpson’s fans? #o
Truly awful design, it’s the
Truly awful design, it’s the size of a garden shed.
This quote makes no sense:
“Registation is a method for riders to show their riding skills, insure themselves & third parties and welcomed as a responsible user of road & pedestrian environments.”
Registration has nothing to do with riding skills or insurance.
What worries me is this drive
What worries me is this drive to get us all licensed and paying taxes yet giving us nothing in return such as laws protecting us when motorists want to pass us (California this month passed a 3 meter rule when passing). Or giving us dedicated cycling lanes like most other countries have.
I still get idiots telling me that i do not pay road tax in the UK at which point i have to remind them that they do not either.
” giving us nothing in return
” giving us nothing in return such as laws protecting us when motorists want to pass us (California this month passed a 3 meter rule when passing)”
A lot of states have the law, Enforcement is the problem. The likely hood that A police officer actually witnesses it combined with whether they actually want to enforce it makes it similar in affect to the law against J-walking
my only feeling is that this
my only feeling is that this is basically an effort to get bikes off the road. Everyone? knows that bicycles are toys and have no place on modern roads. That all cyclists do is hold up traffic, jump red lights, cause accidents, run down little old grannies, video law abiding motorists, whinge if they get hit start wars in the middle east*…..
*GWB rode a bike so it must be true.
mrmo wrote:my only feeling is
Yep, basically that’s what it is. And everyone knows that, and everyone knows that everyone knows that, and the politicians concerned don’t give a damn that everyone knows what’s going on. They’re playing to the mob, and the Australian media portray cyclists as the outsider and a social problem.
As long as it uses the safety argument as a disclaimer, they can play just about any anti-cycling card in plain site. In fact I bet they also claim that many of their best friends are cyclists…
After reading this I had to
After reading this I had to check the date and make sure it wasn’t April 1st.
And that I wasn’t reading a satire.
When people started wearing
When people started wearing the first bicycle helmets in the early 1980s, popular sentiment considered them absolutely ridiculous. Now they have been compulsory in Australia for 24 years, cycling conditions and attitudes are crap, participation is woefully low, and people who ride without helmets are considered “idiots” by popular sentiment, and fined by the police. So laugh now (yes I did too), but watch out. There are no depths of stupidity low enough that Australian cycling policy can’t plumb them.
If cyclists have to start
If cyclists have to start paying “road tax” or whatever you want to call it, then we need to be treated as “proper road users” and have our own dedicated infrastructure. Since we all know that will never happen, why would we pay “road tax”? We all contribute to the general taxation pool anyway, so…
Personally, I think that the ‘smart helmet’ looks like it was built out of a plastic brick construction system that shall remain nameless, and like it is purposefully intended to make people say “Ah, well, I think I’ll just get a car, mate….”.
That would cure Chris Froome
That would cure Chris Froome of his “lookingatpowermeteritis”, but other than that I can draw no positives…
I much prefer our version…
I much prefer our version… Magpies are a real problem in spring.