Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Essex police: If cyclists were more safety-conscious they wouldn’t get killed

Crackdown continues on cyclists legally riding without helmets and high-visibility clothing

An Essex police officer has claimed that cyclists need to be more safety-conscious to spare families the heartbreak of a visit from an officer bearing bad news.

Speaking to the Essex Chronicle’s Joe Sturdy, PC Deborah Gray said: “If families have to see a white-hatted officer at their door, then it’s horrible because they just know why they are there.

“If cyclists were more safety-conscious then families would not have to see that.”

Police in Chelmsford are currently engaged in an exercise to improve safety and reduce casualties among cyclists. Operation Bluenose is claimed to be targeting both cyclists and motorists, but the force’s statements and press reports make scant mention of drivers.

“Operation Bluenose aims to identify at risk riders and urge them to use more safety equipment such as lights, helmets and high visibility clothing,” the police said when the exercise was announced.

PC Gray said she had spoken to a rider who was dressed entirely in black.

She said: “He said ‘If a car cannot see me he should not be driving’.

“He only wears his helmet when he is going on long cycle rides because he is stop-start, stop-start [in the town].”

As well as telling riders not to wear perfectly normal clothes, police are also encouraging them to wear helmets.

Sergeant Graham Freeman, who is running the operation, said: “The most common response we get is that it’s a man thing [not to wear a helmet]. We think helmets reduce the number of injuries.

“Men do generally not like to wear helmets. I have been to many accidents where cyclists have got head injuries. They can be pretty serious injuries.”

Around 90 cyclists were stopped in Chelmsford on Friday and police had previously stopped around 120 in Basildon.

Sgt Freeman said: “About 50 per cent had no lights and were given verbal warnings. About 50 per cent had no reflective clothing and 75 per cent had no cycle helmet.”

Commenters on the Essex Chronicle’s story are not impressed. PaulM132 said: “Someone should tell Essex Police that there is no legal requirement to wear a helmet, or any particular type of clothing, while cycling. There is no requirement to carry lights - only where cycling in hours of legal darkness.

"And there is certainly no basis for telling cyclist that they are responsible for their own safety. That is like saying that they should wear a bullet proof vest in case a gunman is on the loose.”

One commenter, 04smallmj doubts the crackdown is even necessary: “I used to cycle in Chelmsford a lot and it was probably the best place that I've cycled and lived in, so it's a shame and a bit embarrasing to see this.

"I actually ditched my helmet and hi viz while living there so I would definitely be one of the ‘naughty cyclists’ who have been given victim blaming advice. I also think that the quote ‘we *think* helmets reduce the number of injuries’ says a lot too.”

Izzy_G added: “The health benefits of cycling far outweigh the dangers, whether one wears a helmet or not, so we should be doing as much as we can to get more people on their bikes.

"Campaigns like this, which stress the dangers of cycling do just the opposite by discouraging the very people we want to get on their bikes.”

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

100 comments

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 10 years ago
0 likes

Over 80% of incidents involving cyclsits are not the fault of the rider. Those are the DfT's own statistics. It sounds like the Essex police haven't bothered to read any recent crash data analysis and have stuck with the Daily Mail approach instead.

Avatar
Jonathan Reeves | 10 years ago
0 likes

Dear commissioner,
I am dismayed and infuriated by the ill informed comments of PC Deborah Gray and utter waste of precious police resources by Essex Police to penalize cyclists in Chelsmford conducting Operation Blue nose. The current government is spending millions of pounds encouraging people to be more active and reduce emissions which have a beneficial effect on the environment and the economy and positively promote the use of the cycle to commute to work, so why oh why are Essex police targeting the cyclist? A cynic would say they are an easy target as opposed to targeting the increasingly aggressive driving manner of many motorists.
I have a few basic questions for you to consider?
How many times has a cyclist killed a motorist or pedestrian in the last 12 months in Essex?
now reverse the question;
How many times has a motorist killed a cyclist or pedestrian in the last 12 months in Essex?
The ignorance surrounding the road safety advice regarding helmets is astounding, are you aware of the 2006 study by Dr Ian Walker from the University of Bath found that drivers passed closer to cyclists wearing a helmet when overtaking than they did to those without them. The driver's subconscious sees them as less vulnerable and therefore less worthy of a wide berth.
I'm sure someone some where had good intentions but this smacks as a victim blaming culture, akin to telling people to not smoke or drink. The police should stick to enforcing the law and not nannying the community they serve. Put simply it isn't there job. There may be a perceived risk but people are not breaking the law by not wearing a helmet, the benefits to the nation and the individual massively out weigh the risks, I could quote a ton of statistics at you to support this but I'm sure you are already aware. The police are on very dodgy ground. To the community it feels like a form of harassment, whatever next advising fat people to lose weight?

Avatar
kraut | 10 years ago
0 likes

I like the building site analogy. But they should take it seriously.

* Dangerous machinery would be properly risk assessed.
* Lorries couldn't move without a banksman checking the blindspot.
* If there's an injury or death, it gets properly investigated, those responsible are at least fined, and recommendations on avoiding the accident feed back into best practice.

Which is pretty much the opposite of what happens on the roads.

So, yes, treat roads like building sites for a while.

Avatar
Airzound | 10 years ago
0 likes

The Filth at their finest. Bunch of losers. They did absolutely nothing when I was knocked off and left for dead. Most of them are thick arrogant over weight slobs who could do with riding a bike themselves at rush hour on a busy road when it's peeing with rain.

Avatar
seven | 10 years ago
0 likes

Far more pedestrians and motorists get fatal or life-changing head injuries per mile travelled in towns than cyclists do. Why aren't people up in arms about them choosing not to wear helmets? If it's a sensible suggestion that cyclists should be required to wear helmets then, given the huge quantity of evidence, it must be even more sensible that drivers and pedestrians should too?

In fact why stop there? If everyone not driving a motor vehicle was required to be cocooned in a three foot thick layer of bubble wrap then drivers could presumably just do away with the pesky "awareness" obligation that comes with piloting a few tons of metal around the place and instead just keep their eyes on more important stuff like their mobile phone/lunch/makeup/whatever.

"Sorry mate, I didn't see you" ... translation: "Sorry mate, I wasn't looking".

Avatar
Rouboy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Around 90 cyclists were stopped in Chelmsford on Friday and police had previously stopped around 120 in Basildon.

Sgt Freeman said: “About 50 per cent had no lights and were given verbal warnings. About 50 per cent had no reflective clothing and 75 per cent had no cycle helmet.”............................................................

Well Sergeant Freeman how were you ever promoted?
Police are supposed to work with facts and all your quotes above are, "Around" 90 cycles stopped "about" 50 % and so on.

Surely you are educated enough to give a factual report after all "around" 90 cycles is not a lot. Perhaps you did not have enough fingers and toes. Or are you rather over egging the pudding to make you operation look good for all those above you who are only interested in figures.

Facts please

Avatar
Legin | 10 years ago
0 likes

As an Essex resident I am not happy with the quotes from these officers. One of the challenges we all face is that "cyclists" like "motorists" are treated as one homogeneous mob. The reality is that we are all different.

There is an issue in Essex with some cyclists (as there is with some motorists); but not one's like me! In the area I live I regularly see teenagers and people of all ages riding bikes, in the dark on the road, with no lights, no bright clothing and of course they have chosen not to wear a helmet (although remarkably many of the adults do!). This is a problem of education that needs to be addressed with police enforcement backing it up.

I dread the day that I fail to spot one of these idiots as they bunny hop off the pavement, across the road and my car sends them of to collect their Darwin award. If it does happen I'll be the one having to live with it.

It should be born in mind that (as with most of the UK) Essex hates spending money on children and youth services (they actually hate children basically; Southend is different). Therefore it is cheaper to let the police "educate" rather than running an extensive program of training courses.

Avatar
mtm_01 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Needs to be a difference made between 'cyclists' and 'people who happen to be on a bike'.

It's normally the latter who have no lights, no helmet etc. (hi-vi stuff is largely irrelevant if you're lit up enough anyway).

Avatar
northstar | 10 years ago
0 likes

Oh look, bike snobbery is even prevalent among bike riders it seems.

Avatar
Saratoga | 10 years ago
0 likes

If Essex police actually bothered to stop dangerous driving in their county, fewer cyclists would get killed there.

Avatar
Mr Agreeable | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

I saw 3 ninja cyclists riding home tonight wearing stealth black and with no lights.

Does anyone else's irony detector go off when they read comments like this? Just me?

Avatar
Karbon Kev | 10 years ago
0 likes

usual police nonsense, blame it on not being able to see the cyclist, of course ....

Avatar
BarefootBrian | 10 years ago
0 likes

In the past I was a regular cyclist in Bristol, on ordinary roads. (I now need a van to transport my tools & equipment)

I have had a number of accidents where I have fallen at high speeds over the years, but never once hit my head. Yes, I received minor cuts & bruises, scraped elbows, etc, but never any serious injuries, despite most of these occurring in the presence of motor vehicles.

I was knocked off my bike by a tanker within weeks of arriving in the city to start work, and all that was damaged was my bike. He thought he could get past me before the road narrowed - he underestimated my speed!

I have been knocked off my bike by a car driver who was distracted at a roundabout, all I suffered was a dislocation of my colarbone. (I was wearing brightly-coloured lycra at the time, but he still didn't see me, even though I know he was looking in my direction!)

I rode into the side of a car that appeared from nowhere at a difficult junction - and received a bruised a finger & friction burn, whilst causing over £1000 damage to the car!

It isn't about making cyclists more responsible for their own safety, it's about making drivers more aware. And until the penalties they face are more realistic they really don't need to do so. The CPS is reluctant to prosecute for "Dangerous Driving", preferring the easier-to-prove "Careless Driving" charge - which unfortunately has a much lower tariff, one which really isn't much of a deterrent to your average driver.

Only when the penalties for causing death by driving in any form are made high enough to provide a true deterrent will we see drivers taking the care they should when in the presence of cyclists. (It's a bit like the suggestion that all cars shold be fitted with a spike in the middle of the steering wheel. If they were all drivers would be far more careful to avoid accidents!) Apparently we all drive to "a perceived level of danger" - there is no real danger to car drivers from cyclists, either from the accident itself or the consequences, so they can, in effect, ignore them.

Avatar
BarefootBrian | 10 years ago
0 likes

In the past I was a regular cyclist in Bristol, on ordinary roads. (I now need a van to transport my tools & equipment)

I have had a number of accidents where I have fallen at high speeds over the years, but never once hit my head. Yes, I received minor cuts & bruises, scraped elbows, etc, but never any serious injuries, despite most of these occurring in the presence of motor vehicles.

I was knocked off my bike by a tanker within weeks of arriving in the city to start work, and all that was damaged was my bike. He thought he could get past me before the road narrowed - he underestimated my speed!

I have been knocked off my bike by a car driver who was distracted at a roundabout, all I suffered was a dislocation of my colarbone. (I was wearing brightly-coloured lycra at the time, but he still didn't see me, even though I know he was looking in my direction!)

I rode into the side of a car that appeared from nowhere at a difficult junction - and received a bruised a finger & friction burn, whilst causing over £1000 damage to the car!

It isn't about making cyclists more responsible for their own safety, it's about making drivers more aware. And until the penalties they face are more realistic they really don't need to do so. The CPS is reluctant to prosecute for "Dangerous Driving", preferring the easier-to-prove "Careless Driving" charge - which unfortunately has a much lower tariff, one which really isn't much of a deterrent to your average driver.

Only when the penalties for causing death by driving in any form are made high enough to provide a true deterrent will we see drivers taking the care they should when in the presence of cyclists. (It's a bit like the suggestion that all cars shold be fitted with a spike in the middle of the steering wheel. If they were all drivers would be far more careful to avoid accidents!) Apparently we all drive to "a perceived level of danger" - there is no real danger to car drivers from cyclists, either from the accident itself or the consequences, so they can, in effect, ignore them.

Avatar
qwerky | 10 years ago
0 likes

Isn't it the job of the police to catch criminals and prevent crime?

How many of those cyclists stopped were criminal, or were likely to cause a crime to happen?

How many reports of dangerous driving (which is a crime under the RTA) do the police follow up or investigate?

Does someone see a disjoint here?

Imagine if there was an increase in sexual attacks on women in Essex. Instead of investigating the attacks the police response is to stop women and offer them advice on what to wear.

Avatar
Airzound | 10 years ago
0 likes

Police are currently part of the problem not the solution.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes

My initial reaction was WTF, but I assume what the police are saying is use common sense. The problem is I fail to see what this will achieve as if you had common sense you would not be in this category anyway. For instance, the idiot this morning riding at 7.30, poor light, rush hour on the a30, a fast single lane, no lights and his 'hi vis' jacket obscured by his low vis rucksack.

Wearing black is fine, but add some reflective elements and decent lights.

There there is the road safety aspect. Fellow cyclists, stop jumping or riding through red lights, no need what so ever.

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 10 years ago
0 likes

I do wonder whether this attitude had anything to do with the failure to prosecute the driver who knocked me off at a roundabout in Essex (just...) last June.

We all hate the cycling ninjas. Because they give us a bad name. But, as said, cycling without a helmet is not illegal. Cycling without hi-vis is not illegal. How about the police actually follow up on things that actually are illegal?

Avatar
Chuck | 10 years ago
0 likes

“Men do generally not like to wear helmets. I have been to many accidents where cyclists have got head injuries. They can be pretty serious injuries.”

I'm sure he's also been to plenty of accidents where drivers have got pretty serious head injuries, not sure why cyclists should be a special case here.

Avatar
parksey | 10 years ago
0 likes

Fair point, it does seem to be something of a losing battle.

Much like oozaveared who I quoted, I'm a daily rush-hour commuter across a town that doesn't have a massive cycling population (i.e. drivers don't necessarily expect to see cyclists about), so I do what I can to stay visible purely in the interests of self-preservation!

My rather fetching day-glow tabard does at least offer my employer a bit of free advertising when I'm out and about, so at least somebody wins...

Avatar
Beefy | 10 years ago
0 likes

UK police stop all black cars which do not have headlights turned on in crackdown on drivers who are not safety conscious! Imagine? No me either

Avatar
Jimbonic | 10 years ago
0 likes

Oh, and the TdF is riding through Chelmsford. Police road block checking for hi-vis and lights in the middle of summer?!

Avatar
McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Having watched the programme Horizon on BBC2 on Monday its become evident that the driving test as they stand are wholly inadequate.
They need to take into account the ability or inability of human beings to function during multiple tasks, some of us are biologically unable to see whats right in front of us whilst we concentrate on other tasks ie cant see cyclists/pedestrians whilst driving, surely that needs to be addressed?

Avatar
McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Agree entirely oozaveared
I passed mine after 6 lessons, it seems driving has become a right rather than a privelege, with no thought to the inherent danger in allowing a mass of untrained people to swan about as they please at the controls of large metal boxes on wheels.

Avatar
james-o | 10 years ago
0 likes

What the police are saying here is simple common sense, lessen the odds of being a statistic. But they do need to state / recognise that nothing can protect a rider from the more idiotic drivers out there and that the Police are in a better position than most to help cyclist's safety (issues with funding, courts aside).
Start with the most serious threat and work down from there, and stop giving the moron drivers (and defence lawyers, insurance companies etc) more fuel for their own blame-avoidance.

Avatar
McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes

don't see how it can be common sense to blame victims for an incident, we wouldn't accept the police saying women should dress in a manner which wouldn't attract rapists, and how on earth do you dress so as not to be stabbed should we all be issued with stab vests?

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to northstar | 10 years ago
0 likes
northstar wrote:

Oh look, bike snobbery is even prevalent among bike riders it seems.

Call me pedantic, but why the 'even'? Where else would you find bike-snobbery but amongst bike-riders?  1

Every activity, interest, or community generates its own form of snobbery, and the most notable feature of it is usually that it involves distinctions that mystify outsiders.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Legin | 10 years ago
0 likes
Legin wrote:

In the area I live I regularly see teenagers and people of all ages riding bikes, in the dark on the road, with no lights, no bright clothing and of course they have chosen not to wear a helmet (although remarkably many of the adults do!). This is a problem of education that needs to be addressed with police enforcement backing it up.

Your comment is very odd, as you conflate together very different issues.

What 'police enforcement' is needed to deal with the (non) issue of 'not wearing bright clothing' or 'not wearing a helmet'? How do the police 'enforce' something that is not a law or even backed by evidence?

If its wrong for them to not wear a helmet (when the chances of the helmet making any difference to outcomes is very small) why is it OK for you to drive a car (a choice which creates a far greater risk than their choice not to wear a helmet)?

And 'education' would surely just make people aware of how problematic helmet-pushing actually is?
Police enforcing the law on having lights, and possibly some education on the usefulness of reflective material after dark, fair enough.

One thing that bemuses me is how occasionally I see cyclists in full yellow high-viz gear, after dark, but with no lights. I don't quite get that one at all - going above-and-beyond in one dubious respect while breaking the law in another!

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes
Simmo72 wrote:

There there is the road safety aspect. Fellow cyclists, stop jumping or riding through red lights, no need what so ever.

I don't see why you only address that to cyclists. Why not to all road users?
I find the widespread myth that motorists don't regularly jump red lights to be quite baffling. Do people not use their own eyes?
The only difference is when in the phase they do it - motorists do it overwhelmingly during the period shortly after a light change, though I often see them doing it well into the phase if its a ped-crossing only and there's no-one crossing.

Avatar
mrmo replied to Beefy | 10 years ago
0 likes
Beefy wrote:

UK police stop all black cars which do not have headlights turned on in crackdown on drivers who are not safety conscious! Imagine? No me either

Wish they would do something about all the silver cars in fog!!!

Pages

Latest Comments