Home
Because we're all balding MAMIL speed merchants, yeah?

You may have noticed there was yet another anti-cyclist rant in the press yesterday – this time, courtesy of Metro and its blog co-ordinator, Yvonne Caster.

We don’t usually give these tiresome diatribes the time of day on road.cc, but London cyclist Bart Chan sent us a fantastic takedown which follows the structure of the Metro piece, while demolishing it in spectacular fashion.

We’ve featured Bart on road.cc before – back in May, when he was in hospital recovering from injuries sustained when he was rear-ended by a lorry as he was riding his bike along Upper Thames Street.

In an interview with BBC London’s Tom Edwards, he hit out at mayor Boris Johnson’s record on making the capital’s streets safer for cyclists.

- HGV collision victim Bart Chan accuses Boris Johnson of "empty words" on London cycling safety

With Caster accusing cyclists of “causing accidents and generally being a total liability on the modern highway,” we reckon Bart, given his own experience, has something to say on the issue.

And he gives it with both barrels; it’s best read in conjunction with the Metro piece, but if you want to avoid a red mist descending, we’ll understand if you skip it. Over to Bart:

There's a writer with a lonely single brain cell haunting our cherished media - the crap journalist.

She or he, gender isn't really relevant, is normally found spouting complete nonsense on rags which care more about getting advertising cash than quality journalism that holds those in power to account - the true noble calling of the journalist. Instead the crap journalist causes a horrid stink disseminating rancid views attacking vulnerable groups who are often scapegoated because stupid people need someone to blame for their crappy lives.

Anyone with half a brain looks like Einstein compared to the crap journalist whose absurd prose is somehow allowed to pollute our culture with its tradition of great writers. The crap journalist is a national disgrace and should go back to school to retake their GCSE English and learn how to write something other than vacuous click bait.

Let's try to figure out where it all went wrong.

Appearances. How one looks is the be all and end all of the crap journalist. Like a virus, they feed off the looks of the rich and famous, almost always women. What they're wearing, their weight, how saggy their tits look - it's the staple of the crap journalist. It all comes from their own insecurities about themselves, because the crap journalist often has the looks of a troll living under a bridge, their overweight bodies sweating profusely as they wear hideous amounts of make-up to compensate for a face that would make a gargoyle scream.

Writing such crap also takes a physical toll and leaves you looking like Jimmy Saville sporting eyeliner.

How on earth the crap journalist finds work writing must be some kind of witchcraft. But then again, they are in the business of keeping people dumb, and dumb people are oxygen to the crap journalist.

That single brain cell is powered up by dumb things and celebrity appearances. Without that, the crap journalist would be a vegetable which wouldn't offer much nourishment.

Then there is the appalling and hateful bile the crap journalist publishes which contributes to a more toxic society.

The crap journalist fails to see people as people, but loves to scapegoat people and reduce them to a sub-human level, like the Nazis did. In fact, the crap journalist would have been at home writing for Goebbels' propaganda machine.

I've lost count of the number of times I've read utter bollocks online thanks to the stupidity of the crap journalist.

It's almost like the crap journalist wants to be shot in the head with a double barrel shotgun so they can be put out of their miserable existence.

Let's be honest, any claims that the crap journalist is giving people what they want to read is spurious. They are a menace to the IQ of anyone who reads their steaming pile of crap.

Don't get me wrong, everyone has the right to their opinions, but the place of crap journalism is in the incinerator.

Get out of our media, one-cell brain.

 

This content has been added by a member of the road.cc staff

16 comments

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey [564 posts] 2 years ago
2 likes

Get in!

Avatar
Dropped [126 posts] 2 years ago
1 like

Class!

Avatar
Woldsman [233 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Aye.  And she spelt pedalling as 'peddling'.  Just saying, like...

Avatar
Charles_Hunter [149 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

encore en fois!!

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey [564 posts] 2 years ago
1 like
Woldsman wrote:

Aye.  And she spelt pedalling as 'peddling'.  Just saying, like...

Journalists. Their job is words and language. C8nt.

Avatar
StraelGuy [1150 posts] 2 years ago
1 like

What a silly cow. I've just read the article and I am, frankly, fucking astonished that anyone at all would publish it - utter, utter tripe. I won't be reading Metro at work any more and I'll be dropping them an email informing them exactly why.

Oh, and Chan is correct, Yvette Caster really is no oil painting...

Avatar
Must be Mad [629 posts] 2 years ago
3 likes

To be honest, the Metro article was just so poor; its not really offensive – just sad.

Its so desperately trying to be funny click bate, but it reads like watching a comedian die on stage....

Avatar
SteppenHerring [369 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I keep hoping that the general public will get bored of the same old lazy, cyclist-bashing rants. We've got some Eastern European immigrants in our club if you want to go for the double. 

Having a go at an easy minority is lazy. There are plenty of real problems out there that need addressing but I guess that that would involve some thought.

 

(Post edit - why not just have allowable HTML tags rather than a random mix?)

Avatar
therealsmallboy [177 posts] 2 years ago
1 like

I voted 'no' for the "should cyclists be banned" vote at the bottom. Currently on 73% versus 27%. Nice to see.

The woman is a troll- just ignore it. It will go away.

Wish Metro would employ Bart Chan.

Avatar
therealsmallboy [177 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
Xwheels [23 posts] 2 years ago
1 like

Abysmal article by the Metro/Caster.
The response by Chan is somewhat inappropriate and distasteful though.
"A fantastic takedown" road.cc, really? No.

Avatar
userfriendly [621 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Xwheels wrote:

Abysmal article by the Metro/Caster. The response by Chan is somewhat inappropriate and distasteful though. "A fantastic takedown" road.cc, really? No.

Yes. And yet it manages to be much, much more tame than what I would have liked to say to her fat ugly face in response. Katie Hopkins, Caster's sister in spirit, called a whole group of people cockroaches earlier. The real cockroaches are 'people' like Hopkins and Caster. Actually, no, that's an insult to cockroaches. My apologies.

Avatar
Beaufort [270 posts] 2 years ago
2 likes

Poor. If that is the best 'takedown' Mr. Chan can manage then he might as well not bother. He gives his opinion of her just as she gives her opinion of cycling. And we all know about opinions, don't we ?

Avatar
ct [198 posts] 2 years ago
1 like

It's all a bit playground isn't it?

It simply doesn't work and is rather pointless and tasteless...as was the original article naturally.

I think less of this site for publishing it.

Avatar
number9dream [47 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

This is much better, a reasoned discussion on the issue, surprisingly from the same rag:

 

http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/06/rather-than-complaining-about-cyclists-mot...

 

 

Avatar
Dropped [126 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
ct wrote:

It's all a bit playground isn't it?

It simply doesn't work and is rather pointless and tasteless...as was the original article naturally.

I think less of this site for publishing it.

What is wrong with the cyclist hating apologists on this site? The reasoned arguments have been delivered ad nausea so many times. It's time to give out some vitriol and bile. The fuckers deserve it. Don't be an Uncle Tom, give it to them with both barrels!