At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Bigger wheels are faster I hear?
"I had to go very slightly out of my way on roads designed for through traffic???? Just so some people could be safe and enjoy cleaner air near...
I think I speak for every cyclist when I say that we more than welcome being treated the same as drivers. I shall start ignoring the safety of...
Not everyone is comfortable with the Abu Dhabi's stance on human rights.
I'm not confortable with the 'evil' description either. I'm also prepared to accept a custodial sentence may not have been appropriate. However, it...
How the f*** am I being obtuce? Because I'm thinking critically? ...
I wonder if that nice Mr Mark Harper, secretary of state for transport, would like to have a discussion/poll about whether cyclists think these...
Yeah, doesn't look much better on the model photographed on Kostume's website either...
Avoided speeding cyclist
I would prefer we stop "paying lip service to cycling infrastructure" and ... actually build proper cycling infrastructure (best guidelines in UK...