At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Apologies but your statement doesn't stand up to close scrutiny.......
I have some sympathy with the cost of materials being up, cost of groupsets etc....
You could spend half that and get a decent upgrade from stock/cheap tyres. But Pirelli don't do 'cheap' tyres....
I can accept the argument that we need signage for zebras that isn't ground based as that can be hidden....
Why the test on Autumnal gear when Summer is just around the corner?
https://road.cc/content/news/germany-trialling-traffic-free-route-28mph-......
Agreed. It's a good idea but not foolproof.
Seem to be many power meter missed attempts, which doesn't surprise me, it's a difficult thing to get right for a decent price. I bought a Limits...
cyber truck owners are complaining of vandalism due to the Tesla brand now being intrinsically tied to Elon’s negativity & bullshit.
That would only work if speeds were uniform....