At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
No, it isn't. "A search of the vehicle led to the discovery of methamphetamines as well as a stun gun and a police dog handler..." would imply that...
'Road test' is one of the boxes to be ticked in the checklist used by my local mechanic
A round up ...
A scenario so unlikely as to be not worth considering. AFAIK, there has been one successful case of a cyclist being found to be guilty of...
A similar thing happened in Boston.
Cranham Drive motorhome: dad clears drive of all vans...
This particular part of the Outer Circle by Hanover Terrace is one of the faster sections of road, it's on a slight downhill travelling south from...
Can't disagree there. OTOH there were clearly others ready to pile in after him who don't even have the wit to pull off a buffoon act....
Whilst this wasn't as bad as it could have been, the Today prog on R4 interviewed Matt Briggs again this morning, and it was awful.
"I added the windscreen because I bought it for £5 in an auction. It actually does work, since fitting it my Strava times have gone up!" ...