At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Deranged
The 100 mile journey was just an example to demonstrate the fallacy of the per journey measurement....
Out of curiosity, who are the "Strava community as a whole"?
This feels like virtue signalling from Strava to me... ...
most drivers would have assumed he was talking about cyclists
Thank you.
Well done to the cyclist who took the time and trouble to report this and to Greater Manchester for doing something, with many forces this would be...
Tell us that motorists are not paying their fair share based on the damage they cause... without telling us....
Why are you so damned rude? What is your problem exactly?
We’re on about things that happen only occasionally, like crashes involving bikes planes and trains - things that happen wholesale like anything to...