At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Or, as quiff stated earlier: https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/road-positioning-cycling-explained
I was one of the sportive riders that Saturday at Paris-Roubaix. I was neither angry nor muttering; I bloody loved it. One of my best days out on...
Not better at all actually. It's just as dangerous. There is plenty of research into it. TRL has abstracts of numerous papers ont he topic on its...
Assuming alot of that historical loss is accounting losses....
Looks more like a tram, than a train.
Yeah, I can't find any authoritative studies from a quick search. Anecdotally, EV owners are wearing through tyres quicker than with ICE vehicles...
If you're interested, Westbrook Cycles have them down to £140 already, albeit in a very limited range of sizes.
Dont think "cheap" is the correct word. The correct price, non rip off. I've 'expensive LeCol, Rapha and PNS (bought for me) jerseys and the...
Quite the car-dominated main page in the Hereford Times today ...
So that 2nd article is about the rantings of people in Bury - home of the Yates twins. Proud of their professional cyclist local heroes? Wanting to...