At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
"Please retire those mats or add a metre to the width to stand in for the dooring zone and put the cyclist in the middle of the 75cm track"...
Perhaps they shouold be called the National Blind Federation - NB FUK seems a lot more (in)appropriate...
Unless of course you can explain how you won...
You've already made the mental leap that the Police actually visited the driver......
Agreed. There are so many variants out there that attempt to solve this issue but don't measure up to a CO2 inflator. They're slower, heavier than...
I'm just going to accept that Caulfield really did say what has been reported, as there isn't time to check up on all the very stupid statements...
In Japan they have the shako shomeisho (proof of parking) rule, meaning one cannot buy a car – new or secondhand – unless one can produce a...
Agree - I thought the whole point of careless / dangerous was to drain the drama and try to make it all more "objective" rather than "did they...
What about the repairability of TPU?
What a load of poppycock, is it me or is this getting worse all the time?