A 94-year-old woman has pleaded not guilty to causing the death of a cyclist through dangerous driving, with motorist entering her plea through her solicitor after she was excused from appearing at court in Edinburgh due to the difficulty in travelling the 170 miles from her home in Caithness, reports STV. The motorist is using the rarely employed defence of automatism.
Elaine Dunne, aged 30, from Leicester was killed in September 2011 at the end of a week-long camping holiday in the north of Scotland with her husband Christopher to celebrate their first wedding anniversary.
The pair were stopped at the side of the A99 road between John O’Groats and Wick, where they were heading to catch the train home, when the prosecution says a car driven by Alice Ross came along on the wrong side of the road, went up on the verge and along a pavement before striking the couple. Mrs Dunne was killed and her husband suffered serious injuries.
Ian Duguid QC, speaking in defence of Ms Ross at a hearing at the High Court in Edinburgh on Wednesday, said that the defendant was pleading not guilty to the charge and said that the incident was due to automatism.
The defence – technically, in this case, non-insane automatism - is rarely invoked, but has been successfully used in cases involving diabetics and sleepwalkers.
It was also deployed by REM guitarist Peter Buck in a high-profile case in 2002 in which he was acquitted of assaulting airline staff on a transatlantic flight.
Last year, the Law Commission held a consultation on the defences of insanity and automatism, and it is now preparing its report.
According to papers lodged with the court, Ms Ross claims that a medical condition that was “not foreseeable” at the time had rendered her unconscious, and Mr Duguid, asking for more time to prepare his case.
He said that inquiries about her condition were continuing, with a consultant neurologist and consultant cardiologist involved.
The case is due back in court next month, and Ms Ross has been excused from appearing once more after Mr Duguid explained: "She is 94 years of age. She lives in Caithness and the difficulties for her in travelling to the court are substantial."
For legal reasons we regret we are unable to accept comments on this story.
To be fair, it's such a staggeringly stupid comment by Havers, that I'm surprised Laura even had a response. I suppose the 711,000 UK prosecutions...
I now use some fulcrum night something's or whatever but there ultra light 1500grm even with a cassette & tyres, I also use some 3t wheels...
I never thought the police use the term accident now? more the term RTC 🤔
Welcome to the Dark Side*! It is a very varied church - if a rather tiny one....
Really depends on your use-case and how much you're prepared to pay. You may have particular requirements for efficiency / low drag / convenience ...
Could Road.cc highlight the percentage of close passes reported in Grimsby and what action was taken. I suspect the zero tolerance only applies if...
Your assumptions about my "beliefs" must also based on the results of your mathematical models. I've never bought bike parts because of what they...
They called me later that evening to say the driver was apologetic and would be driving according to the Highway Code of allowing 1.5m when passing...
In its email, the force added: “Your help in taking the time to make us aware of this matter is greatly appreciated and will improve the safety on...
The quote from the appeal court judgement is not saying that Auriol Grey did anything wrong. That is the essence of the judgement. Her actions...