Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.
Add new comment
43 comments
I'm seriously considering changing my Ultegra mech for a med cage XT so I can get a 32 tooth sprocket. My problem being only the peak district hills, but then I am hauling 106kg (hopefully at the moment but even if I hit my target I'll still be 95kg). I can actually get up hills on 34/25 the trouble being my back spasms after too long grinding and so I really need lower gears to restore a spin which I can easily keep up.
I'm sure some one will be along soon to tell me I have not right to be cycling if I can't ride though the peaks on a 42/21 low gear.
I have Sram Force/Apex on the Salsa Vaya, really like it!
When I upgrade the Serotta, will go with the same system.
Tom
You shouldn't be cycling at all if you can't ride through the peaks on a 42/21. Before you sort out your bike, you must first chainge yourself
I never realised we had Gear Ratio Nazis hanging around!
You're 'fit', yay for you. Don't start telling people they shouldn't be riding if they're not to your 'high standard'.
Whatever gear you need to push to get you out on a bike is just fine.
I'm taking this as irony.
I really like this story. If elite athletes need this gearing on extreme climbs, then it is a reasonable choice for riders like me on lesser hills.
but is he using a compact chainset as well or just a regular 39t on the front?
got a 48/34 apex on one bike and a truvativ elita triple (basically same chainset) on another, I'll admit the double looks cleaner but I prefer the triple for the range and the fact that 80% of the gears I use are on the 39T ring. Idefinitely do more double shifting on the compact
Apex. It's the only thing me and Bertie have in common. Apart from our love of a good steak.
@velo_alex
The Nazis could award you the Irony Cross.
The cynic in me wonders how much of this is out of necessity and how much is from the SRAM marketing department.
mr-andrew - you might have a point there.
shuttie92 - you don't.
with 'special sauce' Dave?
I need all the help I can get
I think shuttie92 was just responding to 1961BikeIE's apparent invitation…
"I'm sure some one will be along soon to tell me I have not right to be cycling if I can't ride though the peaks on a 42/21 low gear."
I'll bet that '92' refers to the size of the gear that Shuttie pushes
Some of the giro bikes are also running front mechs from force and rival but are badged up as red - SRAM have the giro and the tour wrapped up for marketing, i don't think i don't think i've seen a campy lever in there.
Well, since it's worded almost exaclty as the bit in the first post I see no other way but to take this as sarcasm/funny.
1961BikiE - We all want different things from our cycling - that's why there are so many options out there & not a 'one ratio fits all' setup. Solving the cause of your back pain is far more important than people's opinion of your gear ratios. Good luck with hitting that target.
... apart from the two in the picture at the top of this story.
I ride a Campy setup and for Alpine Sportives. A Compact Chain set (50/34) with an 11-29 cassette .... the cassette being an amalgamation of the stantard 11-25 and 13-29 as campy don't make that wide a range. Interestingly though the standard short/medium rear mech cage copes with the range very well! It's a lighter option than a triple.
I wouldn't have got up Hardknott without my trusty Apex rear saucer
Whether it's SRAM's marketing dept or not, it seemed to work in the ITT yesterday.
Dirty Bertie was really spinning away up that climb, and for me (and Dave Harmon on EuroSport) I really didn't think he looked like he was going as fast as Nibali and Scarponi.
You know, if that's what smaller gears does for you, I might stick an XTR crank/cassette/mech on my race bike. Everyone watch out!
Funny you should say that: http://road.cc/content/news/36222-giro-tech-millar-goes-all-mtb
Yes, but I meant with a 26/38 XTR chainset, not a 42/52 osymmetrics like DM was using.
Are the Shimano 10 speed MTB and Road shifters and rear derailleurs compatible? (I know SRAM are.)
Note the 'some' in the text ; )
He also uses rotor chain rings, probably set up full tilt
These are the reasons I've stuck with my triple to date.
SRAM are using the 'triples are dead' angle for marketing but if a dedicated road wide range cassette gets people riding then I don't mind. There's room for both options.
So is only half-filling a water bottle or having a pee before you start the climb. Don't believe the hype - the reduction in weight (200g?) by losing the third chainring is insignificant, even on big hills. For a 70kg rider on 10kg bike it's 0.2% of total weight.
The talk of lower Q-factor is marketing speak too, as the the modified pedals on Cavendish's Giro bike demonstrate.
Funny you should say that:
Millar has rotor on the front mind, set up full tilt i'd imagine
If the gears work for you, then get out and ride your bike.
If your gears don't work, then you're probably either at the velodrome or being a fred!
You wouldn't only drive your car up a hill in 5th gear because you're hard, so why insist on riding a big gear on your bike?
The most appropriate gear is the one which gets you to the top the quickest.
"The most appropriate gear is the one which gets you to the top"
fixed that for you.
k
Pages