Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Ministerial car filmed left-hooking cyclist as it enters Parliament ahead of Autumn Statement

Was the vehicle carrying Chancellor Philip Hammond to deliver yesterday's Autumn Statement?...

The moment a ministerial car cut across the path of a cyclist as it turned into Parliament ahead of the Autumn Statement, was caught live on Sky News yesterday.

The black car was filmed from above crossing Parliament Square from the direction of Downing Street, before overtaking a cyclist, who was proceeding straight ahead, and turning left into Parliament’s Carriage Gates, forcing the cyclist to stop.

Some have speculated it was UK Chancellor Philip Hammond’s car driving him to Parliament to deliver yesterday’s Autumn Statement.

Investment in local roads and retention of the Cycle to Work scheme – cycling campaigners respond to Autumn Statement

Martin Parks tweeted: “Philip Hammond's car just nearly T-boned a cyclist live on @SkyNews #AutumnStatement

M.J Fahy also tweeted: “On way to the commons, #PhilipHammond 's driver just turned left in front of a cyclist! Cyclist had to brake! The plebs really don't matter.”

In yesterday’s Autumn Statement, Chancellor Philip Hammond announced an extra £1.1bn investment in English local roads and retention of the ‘Cycle to Work’ scheme.

Hammond also confirmed the government’s contribution of £9m towards the cost of hosting the Cycling Road World Championships in Yorkshire in 2019, and £15m towards a legacy fund to pay for cycling infrastructure.

The news was welcomed by campaigners. Cycling UK’s CEO, Paul Tuohy, said: “Local roads are what everyone uses most regularly, but they are so often overlooked when it comes to public spending in place of big budget projects like motorways or A-roads.

“The chancellor’s pledge of £1.1bn to upgrade our local roads is a real opportunity for councils to tackle not just congestion, but also the health issues caused by dire air quality and physical inactivity.

“Local authorities must use these new local road funds to make Space for Cycling at the same time. This would be a cost efficient use of new money that will benefit all road users and the local community.”

The All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group also welcomed the announcement for local roads funding and retention of the Cycle to Work scheme.

Ruth Cadbury MP (Lab, Brentford and Isleworth) said: “The large investment in local roads could see a revolution in cycling – I hope that towns and cities across England will get the segregated facilities that are needed to increase our cycling rates to European levels.”

Alex Chalk MP (Con, Cheltenham) added: “Retaining the Cycle to Work scheme is vital for encouraging commuting by bike. Millions of people have benefited from the scheme so far and I am delighted that this scheme will continue to support the growth in cycling.”

HM Treasury has been contacted for comment. 

Add new comment

43 comments

Avatar
bassjunkieuk | 7 years ago
3 likes

Broad daylight and the rider is in hi-viz. Will be interesting to see how Daily Heil going to pin this on the cyclist! ;P

Avatar
Must be Mad | 7 years ago
6 likes

Its a bit meh - the car did overtake the cyclist a fair way before the junction. The car had to slow as the junction cleared, and this ment the cyclist behind had to slow as well. Its unfortunate, but I cannot see anyone did anything wildly wrong, and I fail to see why we should get worked up about this one. 

Avatar
harman_mogul | 7 years ago
2 likes

Well it is self-important behaviour but nobody could honestly say dangerous.

Avatar
Grahamd | 7 years ago
5 likes

Evidence, if ever it was needed that the government doesn't give a damn about cyclists. 

Avatar
psling replied to Grahamd | 7 years ago
3 likes
Grahamd wrote:

Evidence, if ever it was needed that the government doesn't give a damn about cyclists. 

 

Quite a big leap there from a driver (and I admit I'm guessing here but I don't imagine the driver is a member of the government) cutting up a cyclist to government  giving a damn about cyclists.

Avatar
Grahamd replied to psling | 7 years ago
3 likes
psling wrote:
Grahamd wrote:

Evidence, if ever it was needed that the government doesn't give a damn about cyclists. 

 

Quite a big leap there from a driver (and I admit I'm guessing here but I don't imagine the driver is a member of the government) cutting up a cyclist to government  giving a damn about cyclists.

 

Perhaps. However when inappropriate driving of government vehicles is highlighted then a prompt statement should follow to show that they recognise it and are taking appropriate action. The government are quick enough to give statements about what they want you to hear. If they cannot give a timely statement to show that the drivers actions were unacceptable then by default they are condoning it, which shows they don't give a damn IMHO.

Avatar
Applecart replied to Grahamd | 7 years ago
1 like
Grahamd wrote:

Evidence, if ever it was needed that the government doesn't give a damn about cyclists. 

So the chauffeur of a car represents the entire UK's governmental policy towards cyclists? I fail to see any logic behind this statement.

Avatar
flathunt | 7 years ago
4 likes

OMG! Attempted MURDER!!!1111!!!

Avatar
TFR | 7 years ago
16 likes

I don't agree, you don't have to be hit by the other vehicle to have been left hooked by them.  The only reason there wasn't a collision was because the person on the bike slowed down, it's still a left hook, happend to me on a  few occasions, the highway code is clear, you don't overtake another vehicle to turn left, you hang back and wait for them to pass the exit.  It's very bad driving from a professional driver.

Avatar
oozaveared replied to TFR | 7 years ago
3 likes
TFR wrote:

I don't agree, you don't have to be hit by the other vehicle to have been left hooked by them.  The only reason there wasn't a collision was because the person on the bike slowed down, it's still a left hook, happend to me on a  few occasions, the highway code is clear, you don't overtake another vehicle to turn left, you hang back and wait for them to pass the exit.  It's very bad driving from a professional driver.

 

In general I'd agree and it was unfortunate timing but I should point out that in this case the driver is professional in the sense of it's his or her job to make sure the vehicle isn't stationery at what constitutes a predictable pinch point. 

I do think the lesson to be learned though is that they probably need an officer further up the road to stop the any traffic that might make the manoever difficult such as this cyclist. 

Not a good watch though is it?

Avatar
Applecart replied to TFR | 7 years ago
1 like
TFR wrote:

I don't agree, you don't have to be hit by the other vehicle to have been left hooked by them.  The only reason there wasn't a collision was because the person on the bike slowed down, it's still a left hook, happend to me on a  few occasions, the highway code is clear, you don't overtake another vehicle to turn left, you hang back and wait for them to pass the exit.  It's very bad driving from a professional driver.

Thank goodness for this brave cyclist's lightening reflexes. Joking aside, this happens to me cycling all the time and I don't bat an eyelid. I'm not a vehicle and don't expect to be treated as such; I'm a chunk of meat on a skinny bike frame trying to stay out of the way of cars in order to not die.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
4 likes

It's bad driving, and the car cut across the cyclist's path.

It isn't what I think of as a left hook, because the vehicle didn't hit the cyclist. I assume the phrase 'left hook' comes from the name of the punch in boxing. I would say the headline is misleading.

Avatar
Hipshot replied to HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
5 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

It's bad driving, and the car cut across the cyclist's path.

It isn't what I think of as a left hook, because the vehicle didn't hit the cyclist. I assume the phrase 'left hook' comes from the name of the punch in boxing. I would say the headline is misleading.

 

You actually have to get physically hit for it to count as a left hook?

 

Sorry, but that's utter balls.

Pages

Latest Comments