Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Top Gear: Cyclist’s widow tells Jeremy Clarkson: 'Look me in the eye'

Debbie Dorling says Sunday night's "distressing" episode of BBC show “totally missed the point of cycle safety”...

Debbie Dorling, whose husband Brian was killed by a lorry at Bow Roundabout in London while riding his bike to work in October 2011, has challenged Jeremy Clarkson and James May to look her in the eye over their piece about cycle safety in Sunday evening’s edition of the BBC TV show, Top Gear.

Mrs Dorling told road.cc that the programme “totally missed the point of cycle safety”, and that she found one sequence particularly “distressing”, when vegetables were dropped from height onto a hard floor, with a bike following.

“What’s it meant to be?” asked May. “It’s a cyclist after an accident,” explained Clarkson.

The episode of the show, which is watched by millions of viewers in the UK and around the world, saw Clarkson and May present a series of cycle safety videos to a panel of experts including former world and Olympic champion Chris Boardman, now policy advisor at British Cycling.

It quickly became apparent that there was no intention of addressing the subject seriously, as the segment descended into a litany of well-worn stereotypes about cyclists being red light jumpers who can’t afford a car.

Serious issues were barely touched upon, and the danger posed by lorries — which make up 4 per cent of London's traffic, but are involved in more than half of cyclist fatalities — not mentioned at all.

In the comments to our article and on our Facebook page, many pointed out that as a light entertainment show, no-one should have expected anything different. People were told to lighten up and enjoy the jokes.

But others wondered how you might feel if someone who had lost a loved one while cycling were watching the programme, and saw the subject being treated with such triviality.

As it happened, Mrs Dorling was watching it with her daughter. She told us: “I have a sense of humour, so does my daughter. We were laughing then the laughing stopped because it went too far.”

Mrs Dorling, posting as Brians Wife, made a comment to our article on the programme, in which she said:

I sat and watched TG with my daughter as it is one of our favourite programmes. However after the initial laughter at the cycling piece we were both shocked and sickened by the content. Sorry guys, this was not good TV for a family whose cyclist husband and father was killed by a lorry. This missed so many opportunities and I am quite saddened by what went on air, had I realised I would not have watched.

Her husband Brian, an experienced cyclist who rode around 200 miles a week, was killed at Bow Roundabout in October 2011 on his way from his home in Hounslow to work as a surveyor at the Olympic Park.

Since then, the family has had to endure not only their grief at his loss, but also a criminal court case in which the driver of the lorry involved was sentenced to 24 weeks’ imprisonment, suspended for a year.

They also sat through an inquest in which the coroner was highly critical of the Cycle Superhighway Mr Dorling was riding on, which she said gave cyclists “a false sense of security”.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

66 comments

Avatar
BertYardbrush replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

What do you expect from a bloke who chains his bike to a bollard?

The Top Gear message is that on the road, the motorist is top of the pecking order. So watch out you uppity cyclists, we're going to run over you.

Avatar
gazza_d | 10 years ago
0 likes

I think we are all used to and expect Top Gear's blend of lazy oafish humour, but some of the imagery on Sunday evening crossed a line.

The images of crushed bikes alongside slogans suggesting that the rider would have been alive had they behaved differently (not being poor, or not being self righteous) were quite offensive and I can understand how Mrs Dorling feels.

It may have been received better if TG had countered the offensive stuff with some real positive messages to help cyclists, but they didn't bother.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes

It has had its moments and I wasn't wound up as you had to expect nothing else, but I did think this would offen victims of bike accidents.

The producers know controversy creates conversation which in turn promotes Top Gear. The format is tired, the content very dull and repetitive, and the presenters utter c*c*s who's ego's are fed solely by an audience of tabloid reading idiots.

All you have to do is look at the audience on the show. They clearly place the 'attractive' girl at the front to dissuade the tv audience that it isn't full of a load of middle aged men wishing they were the stig who otherwise would be at home locked in their mums bathroom with the screwfix catalogue power tool section.

Next week - something about an expensive car and how great it is and yet at the end they will say its crap, joke about hammonds height/teeth/hair, joke about the floppy haired twat whose names eludes me, staged race/challenge, some bloke promoting a film comes on and drives a car, something about an indian car......and Clarkson looking more and more like a saggy leather cushion furnished in denim ....repeat for another 20 series.

Avatar
gb901 replied to Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes
Simmo72 wrote:

It has had its moments and I wasn't wound up as you had to expect nothing else, but I did think this would offen victims of bike accidents.

The producers know controversy creates conversation which in turn promotes Top Gear. The format is tired, the content very dull and repetitive, and the presenters utter c*c*s who's ego's are fed solely by an audience of tabloid reading idiots.

All you have to do is look at the audience on the show. They clearly place the 'attractive' girl at the front to dissuade the tv audience that it isn't full of a load of middle aged men wishing they were the stig who otherwise would be at home locked in their mums bathroom with the screwfix catalogue power tool section.

Next week - something about an expensive car and how great it is and yet at the end they will say its crap, joke about hammonds height/teeth/hair, joke about the floppy haired twat whose names eludes me, staged race/challenge, some bloke promoting a film comes on and drives a car, something about an indian car......and Clarkson looking more and more like a saggy leather cushion furnished in denim ....repeat for another 20 series.

My sentiments entirely.

Sadly the unholy trinity of tg presenters are in the very privileged position of being paid a fortune to churn out this drivel!

Avatar
Yennings | 10 years ago
0 likes

Whilst I have every sympathy for the bereaved, and can totally see their point, for me it was actually a somewhat positive thing to see cycling feature prominently on such a popular TV show, even one as comical/irresponsible as Top Gear. All part of the normalisation of cycling which IMO is the true key to increasing awareness, safety and fair treatment of cyclists. They definitely could have handled parts of it more sensitively, though - the vegetables were pretty tasteless. And having commuted by bike in London for over a decade, I agree that dump trucks are way scarier than buses. Shame they didn't have any near misses with those.

Avatar
Bez | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'm relieved to hear that I didn't misjudge this piece, then.
https://beyondthekerb.wordpress.com/2014/03/03/lolz/

I thought much the same. It made me laugh. But then it crossed a line where I just wondered how anyone who'd actually been bereaved could look at that imagery, and see the crass handling of it, and still laugh.

I like Top Gear, I never expected it to handle the subject constructively and I see no problem with that, and I hate to find common ground with people who get offended by anything and everything, but it was pretty shameful for Clarkson to stand up and wave victoriously at a jeering audience for displaying an image of death as a joke.

Pages

Latest Comments