At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Anything over £3I should have "expensive' as one of the cons. Just ridiculous prices.
I find that about news in general... it is all very believable until they report on something you actually know about, then it is obviously poorly...
I think he's a good example of why the parkcos have become so widespread among landowners operating car parks. I don't much care for the way in...
I thought I would read that DT article before commenting. It wasn't as rabid as expected and apart from the obvious inaccuracies on KOM speeds ...
I think, along with others judging by the comments, that the cycling group have the wrong end of this - in that the travel conditions are similat...
Actually, yes. Hundreds of thousands.
Meanwhile, in the Netherlands......
.
I quite like the look of the tee, it would make it really hard to tell whether or not I had just come from a paintball fight.
I fail to see why that is any more valid. The markets are not comparable, my point was about how some brands can sell overpriced, inferior products...