Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Sustrans review highlights serious flaws in National Cycle Network (+ video)

Lack of accessibility and too many on-road routes among issues flagged up as charity announces major action plan

Sustrans has today published a review of the National Cycle Network (NCN), which it develops and manages, highlighting serious shortcomings in the existing 16,575 miles of routes it comprises and recommending an action plan that it says will result in the number of journeys made on it each year doubling by 2040.

In its Paths for Everyone report unveiled at the Houses of Parliament this morning, the Bristol-based charity admits serious shortcomings in the current network, which despite its name is also aimed at walkers, joggers, horse riders and people in wheelchairs.

Those include the fact that less than half of it is suitable for a child aged 12 to ride alone, as well as barriers that make it impossible for people on adapted or non-standard bikes or with prams to use some routes, poor signage, plus some sections being made difficult to negotiate or even impassable at times through mud or water.

And while more than half of the UK’s population live within a mile of an NCN route, only a third of the paths that comprise it are traffic-free, with two-thirds of it on-road and more than 2,000 miles runs along what Sustrans says are busy A and B roads.

The review is the result of two years’ work, with Sustrans putting together an advisory panel including representatives of national and regional governmental bodies across the UK as well as organisations including British Cycling, Cycling UK, the Canal and River Trust, Forestry Commission, Highways England, the National Trust and Wheels for Wellbeing.

Sustrans also conducted an online survey of 5,965 which showed that 81 per cent of respondents wanted paths built away from motor vehicles so they could feel safer using them.

Xavier Brice, CEO of Sustrans, said: “The National Cycle Network is a well-loved, well-used asset that’s enjoyed by millions of people across the UK every day.

“We want to build on its success and make the Network safer and more accessible for everyone, not just for people who currently use it. Our ‘Paths for Everyone’ report lays out an ambitious vision to make the Network traffic-free and safe for a 12-year-old to use on their own.

“However, historic problems such as poor surfaces, incomplete signage and barriers mean that for people with mobility issues or those of us who are less physically active, there may as well be a ‘no entry’ sign on their local path.”

“The National Cycle Network is a well-loved, well-used asset that’s enjoyed by millions of people across the UK every day.”

Formally launched with the help of National Lottery funding in 1995, the NCN – like Sustrans – can trace its roots back to 1977 and the volunteer let campaign that led to the creation of the Bristol & Bath Railway Path.  

The review published today includes individual action plans for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, as well as three regions of England – the North, Midlands and East, and South, which can be found here.

Chris Boardman MBE, Greater Manchester Cycling and Walking Commissioner and a member of the National Cycle Network advisory panel commented: “The little blue and red sign indicating a segment of the National Cycle Network is a long-recognised and trusted mark, used by cyclists and walkers alike, to navigate their way around the UK without cars. That alone should tell us just how valuable an asset it is.

“In times of high obesity and poor air quality, travelling actively has never been more important and the National Cycle Network is a key tool in helping address these problems.”

Sustrans believes that investing £2.8 billion over implementing its recommendations between now and 2040 will result in the number of annual trips on the NCN doubling to 8.8 million.

It says that would generate £7.6 billion annually in economic and local benefits, twice the £3.8 billion estimated for 2017.

The charity says that the review has the backing of the UK government as well as the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and among the 15 recommendations aimed at them and at landowners, local authorities and other agencies are:

Removal or redesign of 16,000 barriers on the entire Network to make it accessible to everyone, especially those facing mobility challenges.

Doubling the number of paths away from cars, from 5,000 to 10,000 miles and diverting all routes off busy and fast moving roads onto new quiet-way roads.

Improving safety at junctions where the Network crosses roads and railways.

Improving signage so everyone can follow the paths without a map or smartphone.

Adopting a new quality design standard for paths, including width and surface so all routes are classed as ‘very good’ or ‘good’ by 2040.

Sustrans, working with local authorities, aims to deliver 55 schemes across the UK, ranging from improving signage to re-designing junctions and creating traffic-free paths. These are to be finalised by 2023.

Transport minister Jesse Norman said: “The National Cycle Network is a familiar sight for many, and a great asset for cyclists and walkers across the country.

“This report shows that more needs to be done to make it fully accessible, and that’s why earlier this year the Government dedicated £1 million to support initial work repairing and upgrading sections of this popular network.

“My department has worked closely with Sustrans throughout the review, and I look forward to seeing how the Network is further improved to encourage generations to make cycling and walking the natural choice for shorter journeys.”

Brice added: “Politicians across the UK are grappling with problems like congested roads, air pollution and increasing levels of obesity. In pure transport terms, the National Cycle Network presents a huge opportunity to transform the way people travel.

“But the benefits of investing in the Network will be seen right across government, like relieving pressure on the NHS budget.

“Trips on the Network benefit the UK economy by £88 million through reduced road congestion and contribute £2.5 billion to local economies through leisure and tourism.

“In 2017 alone, walking and cycling on the Network prevented 630 early deaths and averted nearly 8,000 serious long-term health conditions.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
mdavidford | 5 years ago
0 likes

Sustrans' main problem seems to be that it's not entirely sure what it's for. It talks a lot about 'active travel', but most of it's routes seem to be aimed more at 'active leisure' - they're designed and located fine for people who want a gentle pootle in the fresh air, and aren't concerned with going at any particular speed or having to share limited space, but they don't generally allow you to travel directly, quickly, and efficiently between places people actually want to travel to and from.

Avatar
Shugg McGraw | 5 years ago
1 like

NCN1 presumably should be a jewel in the crown of the network.  Instead it is a national disgrace - running beside horribly busy roads, plunging down detritus strewn alleys and bumping over potholed, bike-wrecking off road sections.  I suppose it is conceivable that someone might come to the UK on a biking holiday and think that NCN1 would be a nice way to get out of London - if they did they would be in for a shock.  Rode about thirty miles of it earlier this year and didn't see a single other person on a bike - there is a good reason for that.

Avatar
Giles Pargiter | 5 years ago
1 like

Might be a good idea if sustrans clarified it's aims, seems strange to try and attract "traffic" onto "traffic free" routes . . . LOL as they say. . .  When I cycle or walk I'am traffic.

I think it is true that sustrans fall well short of an ideal network in many respects. Not altogether surprising when one considers the extent of funding available to them, e.g. the gov seems to think 1million is something more than a scarcely significant contribution - according to the article.

Also as mentioned their are not obligatory standards to work to, so as one would expect, councils are able to tick boxes concerning active travel when they have done nothing but erect a few signs on routes that existed anyway, in many cases.

In my view the standards that do exist need to be extended and made mandatory, i.e. some places need the equivalent of multi lane motorways for active travellers, so that high speed cycle commuters and "long haul" travellers are able to safely pass dog walkers and those diddling along with children or using the active travel route as a linear park. To, (IMO) it being perfectly acceptable and even desirable for other lesser used parts to be "single lane" unmetaled surfaces. A model for this already exists for motor traffic of course.

I think most of these criticisms show the need for a national active travel network organiser and for sustrans to have greater mandatory authority as well as greater funding, perhaps as part of the highway authority?

Avatar
Tony | 5 years ago
0 likes

So in summary Sustrans has spent millions building a crap cycle network and now wants more millions to “fix” it.

Avatar
exilegareth replied to Tony | 5 years ago
1 like

Tony wrote:

So in summary Sustrans has spent millions building a crap cycle network and now wants more millions to “fix” it.

This.

I've just read the North of England report. It's rubbish, and doesn't get any further north than the Wearside area in its examples.

All my experience, both as a cyclist and a professional, of Sustrans is that they're brilliant grant farmers and poor on delivery. The section of national route one through the town where I live is a shared use disgrace. The section of national route one where I work is simply impassable, and I don't say that lightly. 

As someone who works in local government I have to say that Sustran's mode of working looks like build and abandon - they get a grant, do some work to claim a route has been established, then leave it to someone else to deal with the issues that arise. 

Any review of the NCN should start with deciding if the delivery and maintenance model is fit for purpose, and then move on to decide how the problems get fixed and how the new network that we need gets delivered.

Avatar
Brown dog | 5 years ago
1 like

I am not too bothered that some of the off road paths are not made of silky smooth tarmac , but I don’t like that ther are not that many paths between large population areas. The other big concern is that all the new developments don’t seem to have a cycling strategy linking to original Sustrans routes , apparently a big new hs2 train station is being built near me but it looks like cycling has not been considered 

 

Avatar
Miller | 5 years ago
3 likes

This is a bit of NC4 near me, aka the Kennet & Avon canal towpath. I've only been venturing off-road recently: why should I even be thinking of an NC route as off-road? Nice as it looks I'm taken aback how genuinely rough and crappy it is for cycling on.

//farm5.staticflickr.com/4917/31976980038_fdba6b2abe_c.jpg)

 

Avatar
Freshmn09 | 5 years ago
1 like

I must have been about 13/14 when I first truly encouncetered the NCN, I cycles route 70 from Macclesfield to the wirral solo, I have always wanted to take friends and family on various routes. but now, 15 years later I am in the south and would like to take my wife an kid on a ride from home,  buy our local route, ncn2 is so bitty and is supposed to cross the seriously busy A27 i don't know how long its going to be before i would happily take them on even the ride from littlehampton to bognor, let alone beyond to portsmouth or chichester!

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 5 years ago
4 likes

I have to say, I'm pretty stunned by the claim that a third of the existing network is traffic-free.  I'm familiar with a few of the more obvious stretches (B2B, the Lee Valley Navigation, the Exe Estuary trails, the Great Glen Way etc), and clearly there are other little sections here and there, but I'd love to see the maths if you defined a traffic free path as somewhere you can a cycle a minimum distance of 1km without needing to give way to motorised traffic.

That said all the proposals suggest that they know the problems, and surely that's the first step to solving them...

Avatar
Awavey replied to jollygoodvelo | 5 years ago
1 like
jollygoodvelo wrote:

I have to say, I'm pretty stunned by the claim that a third of the existing network is traffic-free.  I'm familiar with a few of the more obvious stretches (B2B, the Lee Valley Navigation, the Exe Estuary trails, the Great Glen Way etc), and clearly there are other little sections here and there, but I'd love to see the maths if you defined a traffic free path as somewhere you can a cycle a minimum distance of 1km without needing to give way to motorised traffic.

That said all the proposals suggest that they know the problems, and surely that's the first step to solving them...

I believe certainly at local council level,that shared use cycle paths are counted as 'traffic free' facilities  2

Avatar
jollygoodvelo replied to Awavey | 5 years ago
2 likes

Awavey wrote:
jollygoodvelo wrote:

I have to say, I'm pretty stunned by the claim that a third of the existing network is traffic-free.  I'm familiar with a few of the more obvious stretches (B2B, the Lee Valley Navigation, the Exe Estuary trails, the Great Glen Way etc), and clearly there are other little sections here and there, but I'd love to see the maths if you defined a traffic free path as somewhere you can a cycle a minimum distance of 1km without needing to give way to motorised traffic.

That said all the proposals suggest that they know the problems, and surely that's the first step to solving them...

I believe certainly at local council level,that shared use cycle paths are counted as 'traffic free' facilities  2

Very probably - and while we'd all love completely open, obstacle-free cycle motorways from town to town, shared paths (such as the B2B or decently maintained canal paths) aren't all bad.  When I'm driving a car I look out for cyclists and horses in the road.  When riding a bike on a shared path I look out for peds (and slower/less able cyclists).  I'd still rather be on a shared path (most of the time...) than wondering which of the cars I can hear might run me over.

As an analogy - if I were a fox, I'd rather be in the chicken coop knowing I had to behave myself, than in a tiger enclosure and wait for the inevitable.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
4 likes

Fully accessible?

They're going to have to remove a lot of "motorbike" barriers to do that.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Fully accessible?

They're going to have to remove a lot of "motorbike" barriers to do that.

The one nearest my home does make a nice "bong!" like some sort of temple bell when you hit it with your handlebars, though...

Avatar
brooksby | 5 years ago
4 likes

Quote:

Transport minister Jesse Norman said, "Blah! Blah! Blah! Private finance... No money in public purse... Need. Motorways. ... Not a real mode of transport..."

Fixed that for you yes

Latest Comments