Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Police in Palo Alto stop use of Tasers on cyclists

Patrol car chases also dangerous, say police reports

Police in Palo Alto, California will no longer use Tasers to try and stop cyclists, after a review of an incident in which the electrical stun gun was used on a rider who ran a stop sign.

The San Jose Mercury-News reports that the only use of a taser by Palo Alto police in 2012 was an attempt to stop a 16-year-old male who was spotted riding through a stop sign. Police later learned he was riding a stolen bike.

An independent police auditor’s report agreed with an a police department internal review that a Taser should not have been used to try and stop the boy.

“Had the attempted use been successful, the result may have been unduly serious injury,” said the independent auditors, Michael Gennaco and Stephen Connolly.

The suspect was pursued by a training officer and his trainee, who split up to try and stop him. The training officer gave chase on foot while the trainee used a patrol car.

The training officer fired his Taser at the boy as he rode at and past him, according to the report. The trainee drove alongside the rider, braked and blocked him, knocking him to the ground. There was evidence the boy collided with the patrol car, the report said.

The boy said the Taser had hit him on the left wrist but had no effect.

The internal review into the incident concluded that the officers were justified in using some level of force to stop the boy but not a Tasers.

“The review noted that since the Taser is designed to incapacitate the individual, a cyclist who loses muscle control as a result of a successful Taser deployment could foreseeably end up injured because of a fall,” Gennaco and Connolly said.

There has also been discussion within Palo Alto Police Department about the best way to stop fleeing cyclists. The internal review of this incident and the independent report pointed out that it’s dangerous to use a patrol car to pursue or stop a cyclist.

Gennaco and Connolly said they reviewed a case in a different agency in which a fleeing cyclist was killed by a patrol car.

“This is a tactical question that many agencies have struggles with, but have not clearly resolved,” they said.

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
Bikebikebike | 10 years ago
0 likes

It would be after a warning and failure to stop. If you are basically running from the cops but on a bike then they have a couple of options.
1 Run you over in the car
2 Shoot you
3 use non-lethal incapcitants like bean bag, pepper spray or tazer.
4 Let you go and let any one else go if they merely use a bike to escape the police for any kind of crime.
Minimum use of force /reasonable force rules out 1 and 2. So, to me it seems a choice between 3 and 4. I am in favour of 3 because I don't like the idea that criminals get a free pass if they just decide to use a bike to escape and the cops can't run after them or take a car where the bike goes.
You have to get real close for pepper spray and it doesn't work if sprayed on your escaping backside, so that won't work. Bean bag guns are cumbersome and unsuitable. Tazers are light and easy to use. Lean out the window and fire to get the cables attached 10 metres and then warn that the cables are attached. If they still don't stop then zap 'em.

So what do you do when someone's in a car? Apparently there are only those four options available, and 4 isn't an option. For a car, option 3 isn't going to work. So logically the only options are crashing into the car or shooting the driver. Which one do the police use?

Avatar
Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

Unfortunately in some parts of the USA things are so bad that kids as young as 10 commit murders and violent crimes to get "gang badges".

I'm NOT saying this kid was of the same ilk after all he had only pinched a bike but the way the country is its no surprise this type of incident does happen which is a real shame.

Avatar
Flying Scot | 10 years ago
0 likes

Running a stop sign on a bike shouldn't result in potential deadly force.

If they had a car, why not just force him to stop? Make it the riders decision, stop or ride into a car.

It's like Frank Drebin, luckily he turned out to be a bike thief....... ( when he ran over 2 guys and killed them, luckily they turned out to drug dealers.....)

Avatar
dr max | 10 years ago
0 likes

From the article, it seems that they were unaware of his thieving status at the time of the tasering/blocking.

Therefore, he was at that moment 'just' a cyclist. A child, in fact.

Avatar
sanderville replied to dr max | 10 years ago
0 likes

That's the point that seems to have been missed here. The kid in question is a minor. A child was run down by a cop in a car for running a red light. Was that to teach him about road safety?

Firing a taser that's designed to drop a charging adult at a child on a bike is psychotic enough but actually running one down in one of those massive yank tanks that the cops drive over there would surely count as attempted murder if the driver wasn't wearing a badge. "Oh but he's a professional, he's trained to do that." No he's not, he's a trainee - the article says so. Sheesh. Reads like a story from Infowars.

Avatar
harrybav replied to sanderville | 10 years ago
0 likes

I agree with Sanderville apart from the training bit - I don't imagine even the fully trained police are trained in how to ram children with police cars.

And I'm surprised at all the "got what he deserved" idiocy I read here above. Idiocy because you've all read that even the police recognise deliberately ramming children with police cars is not right. You're quite a weirdly reactionary bunch, some of you. "More running down kids on bikes please!"

Avatar
jarredscycling | 10 years ago
0 likes

I feel like this article is terribly confusing. It is made to sound like he was tazed for running the stop sign but it actually seems like they tazed him after he started fleeing. At first I was shocked but then as I read I lost most of my sympathy. If you don't run they won't tazer you; pretty simple.

Avatar
mr-andrew | 10 years ago
0 likes

I guess in a country where reaching for a gun is considered a normal response, a reaction as completely disproportionate as tazering someone would probably seem quite normal.

Avatar
GoingRoundInCycles | 10 years ago
0 likes

I don't have a lot of sympathy for this thieving brat to be honest. If you are the type of scumbag prepared to run a stop sign and place pedestrians and other road users at risk of injury or worse, don't complain when the police return the favour.

You get what you give. If you don't give a toss about:

  • The rule of law
  • The safety of your fellow human beings
  • Their right to enjoy the property that they have worked hard to acquire without the fear that some lazy, wicked no-mark with no morals will walk off with it

.... why on earth should society give a toss about you?

Avatar
Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

Just to add we only taser someone who is a direct threat to ourselves or another person. In this case though i would not have used it.

Avatar
Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

I've tasered someone, its quite good  1

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

I've tasered someone, its quite good  1

Husband of a friend who lives in NYC tasered himself, just to see what it was like.

He won't be doing it again  4

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'd personally be very happy to see bike thieves tasered whilst attempting to get away. I actually rather like the mental immage.

That said, it seems that the reason for stopping this particular thief was simple traffic violation and the taser and/or vehicle use seem excessive.

Avatar
dafyddp | 10 years ago
0 likes

Bike thieves aren't Cyclists. Taking them out by any means necessary is just fine by me.

Avatar
northstar | 10 years ago
0 likes

Give a cop a...

Avatar
chokofingrz | 10 years ago
0 likes

A few roadside Tasers at strategic points would spice up the Amgen Tour of California!

Avatar
belgravedave | 10 years ago
0 likes

I have no problem with repeatedly tasering someone in the groin if they attempt to steal my bike.

Avatar
McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes

What an idiotic idea tazing anyone non threatening typical overreaction and seeming supported by someone similarly ridiculous, where a bit of common sense would have better served.

Avatar
oozaveared replied to McDuff73 | 10 years ago
0 likes
McDuff73 wrote:

What an idiotic idea tazing anyone non threatening typical overreaction and seeming supported by someone similarly ridiculous, where a bit of common sense would have better served.

It would be after a warning and failure to stop. If you are basically running from the cops but on a bike then they have a couple of options.

1 Run you over in the car
2 Shoot you
3 use non-lethal incapcitants like bean bag, pepper spray or tazer.
4 Let you go and let any one else go if they merely use a bike to escape the police for any kind of crime.

Minimum use of force /reasonable force rules out 1 and 2. So, to me it seems a choice between 3 and 4. I am in favour of 3 because I don't like the idea that criminals get a free pass if they just decide to use a bike to escape and the cops can't run after them or take a car where the bike goes.

You have to get real close for pepper spray and it doesn't work if sprayed on your escaping backside, so that won't work. Bean bag guns are cumbersome and unsuitable. Tazers are light and easy to use. Lean out the window and fire to get the cables attached 10 metres and then warn that the cables are attached. If they still don't stop then zap 'em.

Avatar
drfabulous0 replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes
oozaveared wrote:

It would be after a warning and failure to stop. If you are basically running from the cops but on a bike then they have a couple of options.

1 Run you over in the car
2 Shoot you
3 use non-lethal incapcitants like bean bag, pepper spray or tazer.
4 Let you go and let any one else go if they merely use a bike to escape the police for any kind of crime.

What about the obvious?
5 Follow them on a motorcycle until they stop.

Avatar
mrfree replied to drfabulous0 | 10 years ago
0 likes
drfabulous0 wrote:
oozaveared wrote:

It would be after a warning and failure to stop. If you are basically running from the cops but on a bike then they have a couple of options.

1 Run you over in the car
2 Shoot you
3 use non-lethal incapcitants like bean bag, pepper spray or tazer.
4 Let you go and let any one else go if they merely use a bike to escape the police for any kind of crime.

What about the obvious?
5 Follow them on a motorcycle until they stop.

Or better still, follow them on a bicycle until they stop.

Avatar
badbadleroybrown | 10 years ago
0 likes

If you don't want to get tased, don't run from the cops. Pretty simple really.

If you run from the cops, I don't care if they shoot your stupid ass. Don't start none, won't be none. Start some, don't go crying cause you got too much back in return.

Avatar
mrfree replied to badbadleroybrown | 10 years ago
0 likes

"If you run from the cops, I don't care if they shoot your stupid ass. Don't start none, won't be none. Start some, don't go crying cause you got too much back in return."

and that kind of attitude is how a police state is formed.

Avatar
northstar replied to mrfree | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrfree wrote:

"If you run from the cops, I don't care if they shoot your stupid ass. Don't start none, won't be none. Start some, don't go crying cause you got too much back in return."

and that kind of attitude is how a police state is formed.

And we all know how "trigger happy" "police" here can be...

Avatar
MikeOnABike replied to mrfree | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrfree wrote:

"If you run from the cops, I don't care if they shoot your stupid ass. Don't start none, won't be none. Start some, don't go crying cause you got too much back in return."

and that kind of attitude is how a police state is formed.

Please can you explain how obeying the rule of law and being a decent human being is the kind of attitude that forms a police state.

He got everything he deserves IMO.

Avatar
PhilRuss replied to badbadleroybrown | 10 years ago
0 likes
badbadleroybrown wrote:

If you don't want to get tased, don't run from the cops. Pretty simple really.

If you run from the cops, I don't care if they shoot your stupid ass. Don't start none, won't be none. Start some, don't go crying cause you got too much back in return.

[[[[[[ Okey-dokey, but would I be right in thinking you're from the USA?
P.R.

Avatar
Hector Ch | 10 years ago
0 likes

WTF? Those people are out of control.. and stark raving mad...

Avatar
Ducci | 10 years ago
0 likes

So, it was deemed suitable to try and incapacitate him with a tazer or a vehicle just because he rode through a stop sign?!
Jesus, they didn't even know the bike was stolen at the time. Presumably you're not going to make too much of an effort to stop your face being the first thing to hit the floor once you've been tazered...

Avatar
racingcondor replied to Ducci | 10 years ago
0 likes
Ducci wrote:

So, it was deemed suitable to try and incapacitate him with a tazer or a vehicle just because he rode through a stop sign?!

Not or. AND. I'm sure he was being a dick but determinedly stopping a red light running 16 year old using physical force is pretty insane.

Avatar
mad_scot_rider | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

... a cyclist who loses muscle control as a result of a successful Taser deployment could foreseeably end up dead...

Corrected for accuracy

Pages

Latest Comments