- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
Its a sales trend for new bikes, we all bike to have the same groupset as the pros, it isnt the case for the majority of riders
I built a bike for touring/mountain climbing and sportives.
I spent a bit of time using BikeCalc to workout the speeds I would like to travel at the cadence range I wanted 80-110rpm . I ended up with a mtb groupset 40/28 crank and 11-32 cass. I change the cass for an 11-40 when climbing alpine mountain routes.
I can climb 30% hills whilst spinning at 80rpm, also travel along the flat at 26 mph with the above gearing.
I recently experienced a ride on Military Road on the IOW where I was chasing my co riders. I couldnt keep up on the 1-2% gradient descent with 40*11. My cadence was 110rpm, therefore my heart rate hit maximum. Ive now changed the outer chainring to a 44t. This allows a theoretical top pedalling speed of 32mph, allowing me to keep the cadence and HR down a little. Once gradients go to 4% and above, I stop pedalling let gravity accelerate me .
Ive never seen a rider on the road spinning out a 53*11, even the pros very rarely get to go flat out (120rpm) in top gear, except on a mountain descent.
Freewheel is much nicer, thats what I did coming down Mont Ventoux, 12 miles with hardly any pedalling.
I swear some of them racers have fluent, flexible tree stumps pumping pressure upon the pedals.
I went a different route, couldn't be bothered doing mathematics, just wanting to kayak and bicycle. While cheap I bought my cassettes thinking that they'll go up or be made redundant. Close ratio 9 speed boxes. Final sitting between 13-25. Starting on 53 and figured chainwheels will stay available and easy to obtain.
Cheap bikes, 2 hours a day, love under gearing because that's my best excuse from exercise while having a descent ride.
Instead of gear selected per certain routes, I'll ride where the ratios allow.
Ps. 1 slow rider... Just riding due to fun.
I don't spin well.
I like labouring the crank. Nice slow long strokes. Especially having started a descent and wanting little effort. I found last ride I had 20km in an hour with gain of 200m yet resting on the down the average dropped to 17kmph.
3.5 ratio, a 4.5 -5 would have been lovely to do not much besides gather some wind.
On the flat a 48-14 usually to high for me! Flatbar.
Slightly higher if I'm lower.
I haven't ridden a dropbar in years, I remember liking under gearing on descents because by then, the cars being overtaken are sitting in an 80 zone and I'm enjoying the scare.
New tires new era? Are they really that confident at 110 now days?
How's the head stem cope?
I'm old and slow now! I hope this bike smooth!