Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Near Miss of the Day 261: Burning rubber as oncoming driver forced to slam brakes on

Our regular feature showing close passes from around the country – today it's Buckinghamshire...

Footage doesn’t always capture just how close a near miss was. You can infer from the smoking tyres of the oncoming car that this one was pretty close.

The incident – which occurs at about 2m05s in the video – took place on the road leading from Pitstone to Cheddington in Buckinghamshire on Wednesday night.

Darren reported it to Thames Valley Police. They agree that it is careless driving and have asked for a clear image showing the registration.

Darren points out that another driver took their time to get back in their lane at 2m30s into the video.

As he says in the video: “What’s wrong with these people?”

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
ktache | 5 years ago
0 likes

Loving the new avatar Don!

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to ktache | 5 years ago
0 likes

ktache wrote:

Loving the new avatar Don!

Cheers, Don Simon is don simon and that is Don Simon. 

Avatar
Sriracha | 5 years ago
0 likes

“Whats wrong with these people?”
The answer is in the question - they are people. Anyone who knows people knows that if you accumulate a queue of umpteen people-driven cars behind a slow moving vehicle with few opportunities to overtake, some of them are going to take chances. I'm not saying it's right, but it is true, and it answers the author's question. What he chooses to do about that is up to him. As a courteous road user, knowing that a substantual queue had built up behind me at the lights and in full knowledge that some would not be able to contain their ensuing frustration, I would have pulled over once I had cleared the bridge and let them all past.

Avatar
BIGWATTS | 5 years ago
3 likes

Another selfish idiot in their w**ktank, too desperate to get to the supermarket to give other road users a thought, car or bicycle.
Thatcherism is all about the self, and the influx of large SUVs, often driven like the example above, is a symptom of this.

Avatar
David9694 | 5 years ago
4 likes

bike + car = generally not too bad,  it’s bike + car + car that seems to get dangerous for us. Too many cars is what it comes down to. 

What worries me is that drivers seem to be able to cope with one thing “oh, a bike, I’ll move out to the right”, but two things, “oh, and something coming the other way” doesn’t seem to compute.  If you can’t read the road, you shouldn’t be driving. 

Passing MVs in the video are good, until the small van known as the Range Rover sides into shot. Close enough to touch, it looks like. I hope the Police did speak to him/her.  You have to hope there’s a spouse or kids in the car - maybe they look back to see if you’re ok - I would have my right hand up, palm extended in the “wtf??” Gesture. 

 

 

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 5 years ago
5 likes

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to Rick_Rude | 5 years ago
3 likes

Rick_Rude wrote:

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

If you really believe that society post-Thatcher does not differ from society pre-Thatcher in terms of that diffuse phenomenon of 'caring', then I can only assume that you were born either post-1979, or sufficiently late before 1979 that you didn't really know what Britain was like then. 

If you were born early enough that you remember the pre-Thatcher years and still think that there's little difference, then you're not fit to participate in the political process.   In fact, you're not fit to be allowed to care for yourself.

 

Avatar
Rick_Rude replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
0 likes

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Rick_Rude wrote:

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

If you really believe that society post-Thatcher does not differ from society pre-Thatcher in terms of that diffuse phenomenon of 'caring', then I can only assume that you were born either post-1979, or sufficiently late before 1979 that you didn't really know what Britain was like then. 

If you were born early enough that you remember the pre-Thatcher years and still think that there's little difference, then you're not fit to participate in the political process.   In fact, you're not fit to be allowed to care for yourself.

 

Seem to remember you letting slip you weren't that old, so YOU have no idea about life pre-Thatcher either.

Oddly enough life was probably like it's always been......Have money = life is easy. Don't have money = life is harder.

Go and look at the stats though for the 1970s, Britain's real productivity feel and workers wanted more money for doing less work, would you pay your workers more for doing less?

Funny how no Thatcher government ever made a Utopia and no government of any persuasion ever will.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to Rick_Rude | 5 years ago
3 likes

Rick_Rude wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Rick_Rude wrote:

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

If you really believe that society post-Thatcher does not differ from society pre-Thatcher in terms of that diffuse phenomenon of 'caring', then I can only assume that you were born either post-1979, or sufficiently late before 1979 that you didn't really know what Britain was like then. 

If you were born early enough that you remember the pre-Thatcher years and still think that there's little difference, then you're not fit to participate in the political process.   In fact, you're not fit to be allowed to care for yourself.

 

Seem to remember you letting slip you weren't that old, so YOU have no idea about life pre-Thatcher either.

Not really sure what you mean by 'let slip', since I don't have some sort of phony 'persona' that I cultivate here, and inadvertently 'let slip' about the truth.  I was born in 1961, so I remember pre-Thatcher years quite well.   And I remember the Thatcher years all too well, too.  The damage she inflicted on Britain is still being felt today, to the extent that if a time machine could be invented, I'd give serious consideration to going back to 1925 and slitting its throat as it lay in its cot.  

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
5 likes

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Rick_Rude wrote:

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

If you really believe that society post-Thatcher does not differ from society pre-Thatcher in terms of that diffuse phenomenon of 'caring', then I can only assume that you were born either post-1979, or sufficiently late before 1979 that you didn't really know what Britain was like then. 

If you were born early enough that you remember the pre-Thatcher years and still think that there's little difference, then you're not fit to participate in the political process.   In fact, you're not fit to be allowed to care for yourself.

Thanks for saving me the trouble of writing that. 

I was born in 1951 and remember the Thatcher years only too well.  Mind you, the present "government" are doing just as much damage with their incompetence as she did with her intent.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
3 likes

burtthebike wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Rick_Rude wrote:

Well you learn something every day. Didn't know that the Selfish Bill was introduced by Thatcher. Must go find a Hansard to verify that. Odd that Tony Blair didn't revoke it when he was in power though?

People have been literally killing each for thousands of years over literally barely anything and yet somehow we get Thatcherism as a root cause of selfish behaviour on the roads.  As the great wordsmiths Slipknot wrote - people = shit.

If you really believe that society post-Thatcher does not differ from society pre-Thatcher in terms of that diffuse phenomenon of 'caring', then I can only assume that you were born either post-1979, or sufficiently late before 1979 that you didn't really know what Britain was like then. 

If you were born early enough that you remember the pre-Thatcher years and still think that there's little difference, then you're not fit to participate in the political process.   In fact, you're not fit to be allowed to care for yourself.

Thanks for saving me the trouble of writing that. 

I was born in 1951 and remember the Thatcher years only too well.  Mind you, the present "government" are doing just as much damage with their incompetence as she did with her intent.

'Evil' is a word that's used a bit too easily, but there is no doubt that Thatcher was as close to pure evil as I've ever seen.   

Avatar
Hirsute | 5 years ago
0 likes

About 2 minutes in.

Avatar
NorthEastJimmy | 5 years ago
0 likes

“Whats wrong with these people”

I ask myself that same question every day, doesn’t matter if I’m on my bike or driving.  

Theres a blind bend right near my street and every day (in either direction) cars coming the other way are cutting the corner into the other lane. I must beep (in the car) at least once a week for those who dont make any effort to move back into their lane!  I think if I somehow spoke to every driver who did this afterwards, they wouldn’t have a clue of why it’s wrong.

 

 

Avatar
HoarseMann | 5 years ago
1 like

I could swear that was the Land Rover that was tailgating me the other day in the car!

Mind you, that old Micra was shifting, I used to have one years ago - corners like a boat and it doesn’t take much to lock up those narrow tyres, bet it was terrifying.

Hopefully both drivers will adjust their behaviour following that close shave.

Avatar
Zebulebu | 5 years ago
0 likes

Outcome? Stern talking to for the cyclist - bad language on a public road. Driver clearly not at fault m'lud - low winter sun

Avatar
peted76 | 5 years ago
9 likes

New pants for the red car driver! Blimey!

...and yet another self-entitled selfish tnuc in an unnecessarily giant vehicle who can't just drive sensibly. Does not deserve to own a license.

 

Yes your honor, I did swing a baseball bat at that person's head, but I've committed no crime because it did not connect.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to peted76 | 5 years ago
4 likes

peted76 wrote:

New pants for the red car driver! Blimey!

...and yet another self-entitled selfish tnuc in an unnecessarily giant vehicle who can't just drive sensibly. Does not deserve to own a license.

 

Yes your honor, I did swing a baseball bat at that person's head, but I've committed no crime because it did not connect.

Nobody 'owns' a license. It is a privilege which can be revoked at any time.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 5 years ago
1 like

Ride further out into the road, it stops sneak passes. I dont ride anything to the left of this red line

Avatar
Exup replied to CXR94Di2 | 5 years ago
3 likes

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Ride further out into the road, it stops sneak passes. I dont ride anything to the left of this red line

 

Agreed, don't ride in the gutter. 

The rider in the video is positioned well, but can't mitigate against every d-head driver.

 

Also, Spain has just changed their laws: https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2019/03/01/tougher-driving-penalties-appr...

I'm not sure how this compares with the UK?

 

 

 

Avatar
fixit replied to CXR94Di2 | 5 years ago
1 like

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Ride further out into the road, it stops sneak passes. I dont ride anything to the left of this red line

 

yes, that is the sure thing to do but I'm a bit scared sometimes as I hear them aproaching FAST without even leting the accelerator go. the orks on four wheels always win in that case...

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
12 likes

"What's wrong with these people?"

Fifty years of being told that they are kings of the road and that cyclists are of no account, reinforced by a legal system which values your life at zero.  Coupled with the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
7 likes

burtthebike wrote:

"What's wrong with these people?"

Fifty years of being told that they are kings of the road and that cyclists are of no account, reinforced by a legal system which values your life at zero.  Coupled with the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T.

I'd have taken five paragraphs to write that.

Respect. 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
0 likes

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

"What's wrong with these people?"

Fifty years of being told that they are kings of the road and that cyclists are of no account, reinforced by a legal system which values your life at zero.  Coupled with the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T.

I'd have taken five paragraphs to write that.

Respect. 

Thanks.  Being concise is a valuable asset; cultivate it.

Avatar
srchar replied to burtthebike | 5 years ago
0 likes

burtthebike wrote:

the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

Avatar
brooksby replied to srchar | 5 years ago
5 likes

srchar wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

I think it just took a while for the culture she initiated to properly bed in, is all...

Avatar
burtthebike replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
4 likes

brooksby wrote:

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

I think it just took a while for the culture she initiated to properly bed in, is all...

[/quote]

Maggie made greed fashionable, and we are only now seeing the full effects.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to srchar | 5 years ago
2 likes

srchar wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

I'm a child of the early sixties, and society today is appalling. 

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
1 like

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

srchar wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

I'm a child of the early sixties, and society today is appalling. 

I'm a child of the 70s, there are aspects of today's society that are truly shocking and stomach churning, however we are now far more aware of what happens, in every minute detail. Much of the wrong/bad stuff happening in days gone by would be hidden away, no-one knew, children lived in fear of being beaten by parents if they said anything even if they thought they had someone to actually speak to.

There was a shit load of stuff that was happening back then that we find absolutely abhorrent now and that went on far much more than it does now.

And pertaining to road safety, despite mulitple times fewer motor vehicles and multiple times fewer miles driven, the adults of your and my childhood were killing and maiming on the roads at a rate multiple times MORE than they are nowadays. A lot of these people were cyclists and yet they killed a fuck ton of people on bikes. 

There were a damn sight more people who couldn't/wouldn't drive to the conditions, their and their machines ability than there is now, it only felt like it was better because there were vastly fewer motors and going slower and still they managed to wipe out people in horrendous numbers. Go back to the 1950s and there were 8000 road deaths one year, whilst 1800 is still massively unacceptable, let's not look with rose tinted spectacles at the actions of those in the past, all eras have their problems.

 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
3 likes

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

There were a damn sight more people who couldn't/wouldn't drive to the conditions, their and their machines ability than there is now, it only felt like it was better because there were vastly fewer motors and going slower and still they managed to wipe out people in horrendous numbers. Go back to the 1950s and there were 8000 road deaths one year, whilst 1800 is still massively unacceptable, let's not look with rose tinted spectacles at the actions of those in the past, all eras have their problems.

There were more road deaths in the 50s, but that doesn't mean that the roads are safer now, and there are a multitude of explanations as to why the death rate has fallen, most of which do not involve reduced risk, only risk avoidance by the victims, or better safety systems.

Pedestrians have learnt that they must give way if a driver doesn't and there are many fewer walking trips.  Kids don't play in the streets any more.  Cyclists don't ride as much either.  Better emergency services, saving the lives of people who would otherwise have died.  In car safety systems for the passengers.  Better lighting.  Better enforcement of speed limits.  Fewer motorcyclists.

I went to a meeting where the head of transport police for the area said that there weren't fewer collisions, but there were fewer deaths.  We still haven't addressed the cause of the deaths, only brought in systems which ameliorate the effects of crashes while deterring vulnerable users.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
2 likes

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

srchar wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

the culture of selfishness ushered in by Maggie T

I'm a child of the eighties and find today's world far more selfish than anything that existed back then.

I'm a child of the early sixties, and society today is appalling. 

I'm a child of the 70s, there are aspects of today's society that are truly shocking and stomach churning, however we are now far more aware of what happens, in every minute detail. Much of the wrong/bad stuff happening in days gone by would be hidden away, no-one knew, children lived in fear of being beaten by parents if they said anything even if they thought they had someone to actually speak to.

There was a shit load of stuff that was happening back then that we find absolutely abhorrent now and that went on far much more than it does now.

And pertaining to road safety, despite mulitple times fewer motor vehicles and multiple times fewer miles driven, the adults of your and my childhood were killing and maiming on the roads at a rate multiple times MORE than they are nowadays. A lot of these people were cyclists and yet they killed a fuck ton of people on bikes. 

There were a damn sight more people who couldn't/wouldn't drive to the conditions, their and their machines ability than there is now, it only felt like it was better because there were vastly fewer motors and going slower and still they managed to wipe out people in horrendous numbers. Go back to the 1950s and there were 8000 road deaths one year, whilst 1800 is still massively unacceptable, let's not look with rose tinted spectacles at the actions of those in the past, all eras have their problems.

 

In my humble opinion, the main reasons we have the egocentric society today is down to social media and selfish, sloppy parenting, not Margaret Thatcher. Kids are brought up by selfish parents, the sort who drive their kids 500 yards to school in their Chelsea tractors, and park on the zig zag lines, the sort who tell their kids they can be anything they want to be, the sort who let their kids be little shits and they can do no wrong. People on social media can spew shit and can hide behind the keyboard. I am a child of the sixties and weep for the current generation, these little fuckwits will be looking after us in our old age. Our modern society is appalling, embarrassing, and disgraceful. Modern people think the world owes them a living. Driving standards are shit, just look at the dickheads on near miss of the day, every day. The lack of traffic police is in my opinion the biggest reason for the shit standards of driving these days. When I passed my test in the early eighties, you feared the traffic police, the motorcycle cops were hated. Yet the standard of driving was way better, if you went through a red light, or drove erratically, or didn't use your indicators, you were stopped, given a bollocking and then given a ticket. When do you see a traffic officer now? This is why we have an epidemic of shit driving, me me me culture, driving with eyes on the phone in the lap, blatently going through red lights, close passes, etc etc etc. God give me strength! Aaarghhh! We are totally fucked.

Pages

Latest Comments