Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Near Miss of the Day 138: Driver of Met Police van in Operation REALLY Close Pass

Our regular feature highlighting close passes caught on camera from around the country – today it’s London

For over a year now, police forces across the UK – including the Metropolitan Police in London – have followed their colleagues in the West Midlands in targeting drivers who fail to give cyclists adequate space when overtaking them.

So it’s a bit disappointing that the driver making a close pass featured in today’s Near Miss of the Day video was behind the wheel of, yes, a Met Police van.

It happened yesterday evening at around 6.15pm to road.cc reader Matthew as he rode his Brompton up Fortress Road, which runs from Kentish Town to Tufnell Park.

The police van can first be seen at the beginning of the clip outside Kentish Town Underground station, with Matthew leaving it behind at the traffic lights.

The driver of the van took a while to reach him, having to get past some slower cyclists first – we don’t know how much room he gave them, although the clip of the overtake on Matthew may give a hint.

What's more, it squeezes past him just after he has pulled out to pass aa line of parked cars, and in so doing crosses into a hatched line zone, governed by Highway Code Rule 130, which says:

Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right. If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.

Matthew told us: “There I was, trying to power my way up the hill on my Brompton, when ‘Operation REALLY Close Pass’ kicks into effect.

“He had tons of room to his right, and after he flashes his light pops on his hat and doesn’t join the queue of traffic.

“Gives me the impression he was happy to intimidate me and be a bit of a bully on the road.”

He added: “Considering these are the people I report people to, it doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence.”

One other thing that is very noticeable in this clip?

The sheer number of cyclists around on an evening rush hour in London, especially considering this is nowhere near the route of a Cycle Superhighway and that they’re heading towards some of the hillier parts of the capital.

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
craigp | 5 years ago
0 likes

He added: “Considering these are the people I report people to, it doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence.”

 

in my experience, it's people behind a desk at the Traffic Offence Reports office in Bexley that one reports to, not bobbies on the street. :-P

Avatar
Simon E | 5 years ago
0 likes

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to Simon E | 5 years ago
1 like

Simon E wrote:

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

They are 'above the law'. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43459056

Avatar
Htc replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
1 like

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Simon E wrote:

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

They are 'above the law'. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43459056

How’s that above the law?

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to Htc | 5 years ago
1 like

Htc wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Simon E wrote:

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

They are 'above the law'. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43459056

How’s that above the law?

Piss off, 'troll'.  

Avatar
brooksby replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
4 likes

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Htc wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Simon E wrote:

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

They are 'above the law'. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43459056

How’s that above the law?

Piss off, 'troll'.  

LOL!  "Mr Pot, I'd like you to meet Mr Kettle; one thing: for god's sake don't mention his paint job!"

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Htc wrote:

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

Simon E wrote:

Put a brick through the windscreen, some people need to learn lessons the hard way (particularly thugs who think wearing a uniform means they're above the law).

They are 'above the law'. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-43459056

How’s that above the law?

Piss off, 'troll'.  

LOL!  "Mr Pot, I'd like you to meet Mr Kettle; one thing: for god's sake don't mention his paint job!"

 

Oh!  I'm sorry, he's not a troll?  He's just a dick, then?

Avatar
Cupov | 5 years ago
0 likes

That was painful to listen to. I would've pulled alongside and asked for an explanation....what they gonna do, take a swing?

Avatar
zero_trooper | 5 years ago
5 likes

The OP should submit footage as a 'close pass complaint' to the Met. They can't just fob him off as it's a complaint against the police. The police who view these submissions would have to pass it on to some Internal Investigations team. I'm sure that there is some protocol to follow for this sort of thing.
Just a pity that you can't avoid mentioning that it's a police van.
'the white van at 1min 32secs...'

Avatar
alansmurphy replied to zero_trooper | 5 years ago
3 likes

zero_trooper wrote:

The OP should submit footage as a 'close pass complaint' to the Met. They can't just fob him off as it's a complaint against the police. The police who view these submissions would have to pass it on to some Internal Investigations team. I'm sure that there is some protocol to follow for this sort of thing. Just a pity that you can't avoid mentioning that it's a police van. 'the white van at 1min 32secs...'

 

Submit it to West Midlands for review...

Avatar
grumpyoldcyclist | 5 years ago
1 like

Disgraceful

Has it been reported?

Avatar
simonmb | 5 years ago
5 likes

Givin' it beans on the Brompton! Kudos for that. 

#rideitlikeyoustoleit

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
0 likes

Could've stopped and had a word with plod driver.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
4 likes

So excessive speed contrary to the Road Traffic Act (clearly over 20mph), also at the very least undue care but I would consider it dangerous driving given the vulnerable road user and propensity for them to be harmed by this very type of thing.

Top cockwombling.

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
0 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

So excessive speed contrary to the Road Traffic Act (clearly over 20mph), also at the very least undue care but I would consider it dangerous driving given the vulnerable road user and propensity for them to be harmed by this very type of thing.

Top cockwombling.

'So excess speed contrary to the Road Traffic Act (clearly over 20mph)'

That's enough about the Brompton!

Avatar
Hirsute | 5 years ago
9 likes

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Avatar
alexb replied to Hirsute | 5 years ago
3 likes

hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Heaven forbid the Police actually stop to carry out any actual policing!

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to Hirsute | 5 years ago
1 like
hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Think that the rider passes comment on this as he goes past. Maybe as well I can't quite make out what they are saying  1

Avatar
hoffbrandm replied to zero_trooper | 5 years ago
1 like

zero_trooper wrote:
hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Think, that the rider passes comment on this as he goes pass. Maybe as well that I can't quite make out what they are saying  1

 

Yep.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to zero_trooper | 5 years ago
2 likes

zero_trooper wrote:
hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Think, that the rider passes comment on this as he goes pass. Maybe as well that I can't quite make out what they are saying  1

Sounded like "Can't park there!".

Avatar
Hirsute replied to zero_trooper | 5 years ago
1 like

zero_trooper wrote:
hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Think, that the rider passes comment on this as he goes pass. Maybe as well that I can't quite make out what they are saying  1

I was at work and it's too risky with these videos to have the sound on !

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to Hirsute | 5 years ago
4 likes

hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Cars can't 'commit offences'. 

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 5 years ago
5 likes
Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Cars can't 'commit offences'. 

Pedant

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to zero_trooper | 5 years ago
4 likes

zero_trooper wrote:
Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

hirsute wrote:

The car parked in the pedestrian zig zag zone was ok then and not commiting an offence.

Cars can't 'commit offences'. 

Pedant

Yeah, I know.  Just pisses me off that we routinely use 'the cyclist' and 'the car' when talking about accidents where bell ends in cars have killed or maimed someone or destroyed property.

'The car lost control...'

Latest Comments