- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
3 Feet PleaseNew 3 Feet Please website calls for statutory minimum passing distance for cyclists
The campaigner behind today's new 3 Feet Please website has called for a mandatory minimum three feet of space between bicycles and passing motor vehicles. The initiative is based on successful work in the United States such as 3feet2pass.
According to founder David Love, who is also a Trustee and Vice Chair of the London Cycling Campaign, "Fear of traffic is a huge barrier to would-be cyclists, novices and the less confident. If they felt safer, more would take to the saddle with all the environmental, health and cost benefits that it brings. And the more who ride, the safer it gets."
In the US, individuals like Joe Mizerek with his own 3 feet please USA campaign have had great success with lobbying government at state level to the effect that now 15 of the 51 united states have laws enshrining three feet as the obligatory minimum passing distance for motor vehicles passing bicycles.
Going back to August 2009, we have reported on the USA situation as well as the subsequent Downing St petition here which was ultimately given short shrift by the Whitehall mandarins. Back in November, the Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC) joined the debate, pointing out not unreasonably that European law calls for a 1.5 metres for passing - more like five feet - and that three feet are therefore a bit of a concession which was born out by our own poll in which 60% of respondents agreed with the CTC. However, as David Love says, "We’re not asking for just 3 feet – we’re asking for a minimum of 3 feet, depending on circumstances."
Latest Comments
- chrisonabike 14 sec ago
When I first heard, I immediately thought that Chris Morris was back for a reprise of The Day Today!
- Hirsute 25 min 12 sec ago
Ex black cab https://twitter.com/KingArtAT/status/1783296299787309088
- brooksby 36 min 33 sec ago
Wait until you hear about HS2
- EK Spinner 41 min 47 sec ago
It isn't about policing the roads, it is about reducing the likely hood of a dangerous overtake, in this case the taxi driver choose not to expose...
- bensynnock 1 hour 21 min ago
Quite. I was wondering where the cycling infrastructure is located that causes drivers to go 90 on the M3?
- I love my bike 1 hour 50 min ago
If one is prepared to pay £28 for a TPU tube, the butyl comparison should be Continental's Supersonic ~50g or Schwalbe at 70g. Both costing £8 - ...
- I love my bike 2 hours 1 min ago
Media needs to do their part, but the readr/consumer also needs to do theirs as well:...
- ubercurmudgeon 2 hours 38 min ago
Kona makes practical, affordable commuter bikes and goes bust. Colnago makes toys for the affluent and it is booming. Just goes to show that the...
- Mathemagician 4 hours 5 sec ago
To answer your question, yes you can sometimes feel the difference. Built a set of wheels for a friend and he installed them with new lightweight...
Add new comment
6 comments
These are all understandable concerns, most of whch are answered in the FAQs section of the campaign website.
Will it work? It's not cyclists who need to be convinced, it's drivers.
If every driver gave every cyclist a minimum of 3 feet when passing, there would never be another collision. Isn't that worth fighting for?
I applaude the idea but i dont dont think its going to achieve anything. Just bacuase someone in the U.S. got it noticed dosnt mean its the right thing for us.
"If they felt safer, more would take to the saddle"
How is 3ft going to help? Its already stated in the Highway code to give as much room as possible but many dont anway.
"and would help at the training stage when people are learning how to drive."
given that i driving instructors seem to be some of the worst drivers around (at least near me) then i cant see how this can help new drivers, especially since they are coached to pass these days, not to learn. Your just going to end up with a load of teens passing far to close (i.e. trying to get 3ft and we all know how good new drivers are at judging gaps!)
The final issue i think this is the wrong way to go is how will this affect our journeys? Im quite a calm/slow commuter but even i take narrow gaps past v.slow moving traffic or between lanes. Will the new 3ft rule apply to me? you can bet drivers will be throwing this one back in our face if it goes through. Afteral if they have to give us 3ft surely we have to do the same?
yeah 3 feet seems a low target to aim for, start by campaigning for the highway code which is a cars width isn't it? so about 6ft?
would prefer that the police actually enforced the highway code, by saying 3feet you are contradicting the current guidance.
HGVs whizzing past 3ft away? no thanks. five feet should be the minimum required by law, except in 20mph zones where i'd be happy with 3
A fantastic idea that many people should help support! I think the new law would make it clear to motorists what to expect and would help at the training stage when people are learning how to drive.