The groupset war is heating up as Rotor has today revealed photographs of its forthcoming Uno groupset, which will provide hydraulic shifting and braking.
Rotor, best known for its non-round chainrings and cranks, has long been rumoured to have partnered with hydraulic brake and mountain bike suspension fork specialist Magura, on a collaborative effort to develop a new groupset. And today the rumour has been confirmed.
"Rotor Uno will publicly stake a claim as the first complete road groupset with hydraulic actuation shifting and braking. By partnering with Magura to produce Rotor Uno's brake systems (both disc and rim), Rotor will leverage more than a century's-worth of expertise in hydraulic brake systems," says the company.
- Rumour: Rotor and Magura are working on hydraulic road groupset
Rotor reveals in its message on Twitter, accompanying the photos, that the new groupset has been six years in development. The photos certainly show a very polished product - it has done well to keep it so secret this long (unlike SRAM's wireless groupset which has been raced for the past 18 months but has no release date yet).
"Our initial idea was to improve upon existing shifting systems; we knew that our system was a small step forward with its increased precision compared with other cable-actuated systems but we still suffered the same disadvantages of those systems, like friction, devolving inconsistent force over time, and other inconveniences," said Pablo Carrasco, co-founder and chief innovation officer for ROTOR.
"We knew that disc brakes for road were about to become a reality and we challenged ourselves to further the concept and apply hydraulics to actuate shifting as well."
Rotor reckons advantages of a fully hydraulic system are smooth activation, low maintenance and multiple shifting positions. Another significant benefit is the lack of batteries compared to current, and very popular, electronic groupsets. It's also light, claims the company, though doesn't offer any actual groupset weights. Rotor Uno wiull be offered with both rim and disc hydraulic brakes and be compatible with internal hose routed frames.
We'll update this story as we find out more...
Add new comment
31 comments
Whatever niche this might have had over cable, is now eroded by electric/computer. Hydraulic perhaps addresses cable play and fray, but so does electric/computer. Electric/computer also has self adjustment, hydraulic doesn't.
Those who flock to newness will go directly for electric/computer bypassing hydraulic. The traditionalists, and the poor and hungry, are unlikely to change from cable.
The window of opportunity for a generation of profit, if there was one, passed a decade ago.
With hydraulics you could make a push / pull system. Cable systems use cable pull and a spring return. The push / pull system could have the indexing mechanism in the rear derailleur, which is potentially more precise. I don't think they're doing this, because I can see a spring in the derailleur.
We'll be changing gear and braking by pure power of thought next. Now THAT would be quite something
Awesome.
Great to see an alternative system. Absolutely no point in trying to compete with Shimano going the traditional route, so why not?
If they can replicate the feel of an electronic system (ease of use, less pressure to change gear etc) with something reliable and without the need to charge it would be a great option for a touring bike.
I've got 10sp Di2 on one bike and 11sp 105 on another, very impressed by the new 105 groupset, but still love the Di2! It's when i'm completely dead on the bike (this happens depressingly often lol) that you appreciate the less effort required.
Calm down dear it just a group set ( sorry felt a bit Dave Cameron yuk!)
An American company was making a hydraulic shifting system in the early to mid 1990s and this was advertised as an upgrade which would retrofit existing shimano derailleurs.
If i remember correctly, there were issues with reliable indexing caused by differences in atmospheric pressure (weather and altitude), and the system eventually faded from the market place.
Would be interested to see how Magura / Rotor have overcome this, to allow indexing shifting which relies on a precise movement "per click" compared to 'open' diaphragm hydraulic disc brakes which do not have indexing but just apply increasing force to close the brake, with the diaphragm allowing expansion of fluid to compensate for heat as well as atmospheric pressure change?
This is the more recent "Acros" hydraulic shifting system, seen in 2011 but not really seen since:
Although not necessarily identical to the final design, there are some interesting bits of information in the patent documents discussed in the link I put a bit further up - including some details of the ratchet mechanism used in the derailleurs (and more info on the mechanical actuated setups).
Not sure that the link up with Magura is altogether brilliant. Their MTB forks don't have a continually solid reputation and I also had some excellent top end MTB brakes that four years later they simply stopped making maintenance elements for, and went almost instantaneously from apparently needing a bit of TLC to being in the bin.
Hydraulic brakes are better because they're self-adjusting (pads always set themselves at he minimal possible clearance relative to the braking surface). That ability also allows them to have greater mechanical advantage compared to mechanical brakes.
Greater mechanical advantage obviously wouldn't work for shifting. Unless they somehow incorporated self-adjusting into this thing, I don't really see the point.
The other advantage for Rotor is that hydraulics neatly get round the extensive patents owned by the big 3 (Shimano in particular) which provide pretty much insurmountable barriers to entry for any would be competitors. ...
Sounds interesting. My Aprilia had hydraulic gears and brakes. I bet on the smaller scale and with no engine heat to contend with it probably needs less bleeding on a bicycle.
Interesting innovation, and will be interesting to see how it tests.
I assume that this groupset would require frames made specially for it?
Hydraulics don't suffer ftom crap being pulled into the cable run..IIRC Magura uses a form of mineral oil in its brakes and motorcycle clutches, which unlike Dotxx fluid doesn't absorb moisture over time, which is the main reason for changing brake fluid AFAIA.
super innovation. can't wait to see it working
wonder if it will use a shared reservoir for gears and brakes?
Not sure, but there might be some more info in the patent application papers, bikerumour had an article about it end of last week with some details
http://www.bikerumor.com/2015/08/13/patent-trolling-rotor-application-sh...
"...Rotor reckons advantages of a fully hydraulic system are smooth activation, low maintenance and multiple shifting positions. Another significant benefit is the lack of batteries compared to current, and very popular, electronic groupsets..."
Sounds exactly like my current cable operated system
looks fugly
Whatever you might think of the potential of hydraulic shifting, it's a good thing for us customers.
Increased competition between manufacturers brings about reduced costs and better products.
Every person that opts for this groupset over something like Ultegra Di2 will make Shimano that little bit more willing to cut their prices in order to keep their market share.
I don't think that this new groupset is right for me, but I welcome it all the same.
Less maintenance?
IIRC hydraulic brakes need to bleed about each year to maintain its best performace.
Will it be needed for hydraulic derailleur too? If so, I'd consider it need more maintenance than cable one.
But anyway, this is an interesting one.
Do you bleed your car brakes once a year?
The fluid needs to be replaced fairly regularly, and will be part of most annual services.
1. I bet your cable operated gears need adjustment, and maybe cable change at least once a year.
2. Brakes generally need bleeding through with fresh fluid once a year because the fluid is subjected to regular significant temperature increases and drops (I.e. Every time you brake) degrading the fluid. The gear system would not have this issue.
and a hydraulic system has the same advantage as an electric system in going round sharp corners. This looks like the first choice for a winter bike- no battery to run down.
and a hydraulic system has the same advantage as an electric system in going round sharp corners. This looks like the first choice for a winter bike- no battery to run down.
Never mind the hydraulics, what I object to is the bloody arty large aperture photography! I want to see all of the mech, rotor, not just part of it!
Hydraulics are more powerful, consistent and reliable than cable. Would you drive a car with cable operated brake, clutch, gear box? Most performance motorcycles have given up using cables too.
A steel cable in a steel wound housing may well be heavier than hydraulic hose with oil running through it.
It should be cheaper than electric shifting too.
Besides, more competition between manufacturers is good
for increasing choice and reducing cost. Whats not to like
While no modern performance motorcycle uses Bowden cable-operated brakes, most 'sports' bikes stick with a cable-operated clutch a good two decades after the introduction of hydraulic clutch operation. Many motorcyclists (me included) prefer the feel and sensitivity of a cable.
replace a perfectly reliable, robust, lightweight and inexpensive mechanical system with...hydraulics? Every other category of machine is getting rid of hydraulics, except the bike industry, which sees an opportunity to con everybody into buying a new bike. The emperor may not be totally naked, but his get-up is very, very threadbare.
Stuff wears out, users' needs change, innovation happens, people buy new things. Do you truly believe that "everybody" is going to be "conned" into buying a new bike? The bike industry exists to sell us bikes and bits for bikes.
Is there anyone out there who feels they have been conned in this way?
Also I'm happy with my hydraulic brakes on my car. I haven't seen any motor manufacturer proposing replacing hydraulics with a mechanical system, or indeed an electronic one. Neither would I want to go back to mechanical disc brakes on my bike.
Now whether hydraulic shifting is a good idea is another matter but why not try it? If it doesn't work then it's their R&D money they've wasted, not yours or mine. I have an old Citroen DS where pretty much everything is hydraulic (although they did change their mind on using the system for the windscreen wipers...) It's still running 40 years later.
Pages