Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Go Safe Glasgow launches interactive driver and rider training website

Cycle Aware focuses on improving road users’ hazard perception

Go Safe Glasgow has launched Cycle Aware, a short online driver and rider training course featuring over 200 narrated video clips with associated multiple choice questions. The aim is to increase awareness of road hazards and consequently reduce casualties in the city

Go Safe Glasgow is a partnership led by Glasgow City Council’s Traffic and Road Safety Development Section and including members from Police Scotland, the Strathclyde Safety Camera Partnership, the Scottish Fire & Rescue Service, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and Glasgow Community and Safety Services. Its aim is to share knowledge and attempt to reduce casualties on Glasgow’s roads.

While the city's road casualties are at their lowest since records began in the 1930s, the group says that cyclists are over represented in road casualty statistics and this is why they have developed the Cycle Aware website.

The site offers a series of short interactive courses concerned with cycle safety. You are asked whether you wish to take the course as a cyclist, car, taxi, bus or lorry driver and a different perspective on road usage will then be presented depending on which you pick.

The format is a short video depicting a certain scenario before a multiple choice question asking how you would deal with it. Another short video then gives the correct answer and explains the reasoning.

For example, if you take the course as a cyclist, scenarios include how you would react to being confronted with a queue of cars at traffic lights, or how you would approach turning right on a busy road when you need to cross lanes. Take the course as a car driver and you will be asked about waiting to enter a roundabout when there is a cyclist in the inside lane and how to go about overtaking cyclists on narrow country lanes.

Speaking to Glasgow’s Evening Times, Frank McAveety, convener of the city council's sustainability and the environment committee, said:

"Cycling is one of the most popular participation sports in Glasgow and is firmly established as a major form of commuting. It's important cyclists and other road users have a clear understanding of their responsibilities on the road and how they respond to the actions of others

"The real strength of the Cycle Aware resource lies in the ability to participate and interact in the role of one of the five road users. It is hoped by highlighting and demonstrating how accidents occur, we can promote a safer shared road space.”

McAveety adds that the council’s road safety team has a programme in place to visit every business across the city as part of its Cycle Aware and Drive Safe It’s Your Business initiatives.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

8 comments

Avatar
WiznaeMe | 9 years ago
0 likes

The Glasgow website unfortunately uses the 'arms length' analogy, however given that this is loosely taken from the Highway Code, perhaps the better target would be the authors of that document.
(Last revised in 2007 with no proposed review date).
The videos are boring, but then what would be expected when it's about negotiating junctions on a bicycle!
On the plus side the Road Safety staff (none of whom are from a cycling body, which seems strange) intend to visit businesses and encourage staff to be careful near vulnerable raid users. Which is better than other areas who plan to do nothing.
And to end on a positive, I thought the cyclist being unseen behind the car on the roundabout was well presented.

Avatar
Paul J | 9 years ago
0 likes

You need to leave the *height* of the cyclist on their bicycle as room when passing, as *that* is /at least/ how far they could fall. Not an arms length.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Paul J | 9 years ago
0 likes
Paul J wrote:

You need to leave the *height* of the cyclist on their bicycle as room when passing, as *that* is /at least/ how far they could fall. Not an arms length.

Exactly. Any following motor vehicle should (1) be far enough back to compensate for any action of the vehicle in front, and/or (2) overtake by enough that if the cyclist suddenly falls sideways as they *are* overtaking then they still will not come into contact with them.  39

Avatar
Cardboard Box | 9 years ago
0 likes

I've often wondered why they don't use body length as a measurement reference for drivers of motor vehicles when passing cyclists.

Seems to me like a pointed reminder of what can get caught up under your wheels when you choose to overtake any closer...

Avatar
harrybav | 9 years ago
0 likes

Another vote for the Magnatom article linked above.

http://www.magnatom.net/2014/10/i-may-be-wrong-about-glasgow.html

Avatar
harrybav | 9 years ago
0 likes

Drivers do not look at these sites. Why would they?

Not the main reaction to cyclist injury stat "over-representation", I hope.

Avatar
mad_scot_rider | 9 years ago
0 likes

I suggest people read this article from someone who actually tried the website

http://www.magnatom.net/2014/10/i-may-be-wrong-about-glasgow.html

Passing on a press release from Glasgow City Council is no substitute for checking things out yourself - and this 'initiative' appears to be a total crock of sh*t

Avatar
Al__S | 9 years ago
0 likes

It instructs lorry and bus drivers to pass cyclists at "one arms length".
 102

Latest Comments