- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Pride Park Velodrome - next door to The Sanctuary reserveDerby Council ignores wildlife protesters to approve cycle circuit plan that cuts through nature reserve
Wildlife campaigners have expressed dismay that a cycle track around a nature reserve as part of Derby’s Pride Park cycling facility have been approved.
Although the final planning decision won’t be made until Thursday, it’s understood that planning officers have advised the City Council to approve the plans for a road circuit and a mountain biking area.
Nick Moyes, a spokesman from a coalition of 15 groups opposing the plans, told the Derby Telegraph: "I'm absolutely stunned. It goes against so many things – the council's local plan, the national planning policy guidance and Natural England.
"Initially, I was speechless. The officers have a duty to be independent of the council so I'm amazed they haven't seen through this paper-thin application.
Earlier this year we reported that TV presenter Chris Packham had joined wildlife groups in the ongoing protest, saying that losing or destroying the wildlife reserve “would mark a vile act of wanton vandalism” dubbing the reserve a “treasure”.
As well as opposition from groups including Derbyshire Wildlife Trust, Derbyshire Ornithological Society, the local RSPB group and Derby Natural History Society, 826 letters of objection have been filed - but so have 639 in support.
Some of the objections include the claim that ‘UK weather does not support cycling’ and that demand for a track would be low.
The council has said that 8.8 hectares of other land would be opened up as a nature reserve to mitigate for that lost to the track.
But Chris Packham said: “It is an oasis of wildlife that is accessible to many and it cannot simply be removed and replaced.
“It is a treasure and short-sighted and short tendencies like this should not be allowed to destroy it.
“It is a natural reserve, a designated scrap of England which has been recognised as worthy of consent.
“That does not suddenly evaporate just because someone has a new idea.
“Its loss would mark a vile act of wanton vandalism and who would want that on their conscience?”
The report stated the council had "considered all that is practical" and that there is "no reason as to why the application cannot be supported".
Latest Comments
- TheBillder 3 min 23 sec ago
In that £1000 exactly scenario, beginners should probably be made aware that pedals will be extra.
- headingley 11 min 34 sec ago
..... God forgot to give me eyes in the back of my head.
- don simon fbpe 31 min 1 sec ago
What's wrong with dropping down on to the Millenium Bridge, or the swing bridge, then the brief, but satisfying climb back up the hill? #training....
- chrisonabike 1 hour 11 min ago
The relatives might of course disagree, but in general I'd countenance a relatively light sentence* if only we could fix it so that those who...
- ktache 1 hour 51 min ago
Id forgotten that I got a second hand set of project two's for my getting to work bike over twenty years back.
- eburtthebike 2 hours 15 min ago
I listened to the BBC R4 prog "Should cyclists stay in their lane" and it was pretty much what you'd expect from the BBC, a well-informed cyclist...
- Veganpotter 2 hours 48 min ago
My bet is that all these tires popping off are from people with bad pressure gauges or they're simply just putting too much air in on purpose. ...
- Hirsute 3 hours 10 min ago
You have to add images via a reply to yourself after the topic is created. One at a time too.
- chrisonabike 4 hours 3 min ago
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...
- HoarseMann 4 hours 35 min ago
Decathlon have the Garmin Varia RTL515 on offer at the moment for £129.99: https://www.decathlon.co.uk/p/rearview-radar-varia-rtl515-65-lumens/_/R-...
Add new comment
11 comments
But it doesn't have planning permission. It's been recommended for approval. They're not the same thing.
Why not wait till Thursday evening?
I am surprised at the article which just appears to be a cut'n'pasted press release from the objectors.
Its a disgrace giving it planning permission, 826 letters of objection have been filed - but so have 639 in support ?
Going by that logic the tv helmet advert recently discussed here only had about 6 letters of objection and it was binned.
There are plenty of other places to build the track but obviously someone has taken a nice little backhander so this goes ahead.
If Chris Packham opposed it, it must be a good thing.
I don't think you understand the planning process - your headline is incorrect. It hasn't been approved, it has been recommended for approval. It will still have to go to committee and the decision to approve - or not - will be taken then. If 300 protesters turn up and sit there booing.....
Only 18% of the area will be used, leaving 82% for the birds.
The CCCT has been reduced in size and shoved into the sides.
Further reading here: http://tinyurl.com/nl6y3nv
Birds will adapt - in fact birds don't need to adapt as there's plenty of room for all.
I'd rather it be kept as a nature reserve, I dont want to cycle in new areas built like this knowing it destroyed the sort of thing I like to preserve by cycling. Perhaps the whole cycling community should speak out if its so bad as it does us no favours of yet more hatred.
There are 1600 Local nature reserves in England. How many dedicated cycle circuits are there? No dedicated circuits at all in the East Midlands currently, so we need this facility. It'll be next to the velodrome and easily reached from the M1, so will be well used. The LNR is not a SSSI and there are no unique or rare species there.
With regards to Chwis Packham saying that the new land is no replacement as you cant just set up a nature reserve, isnt that just what they with this one? Wasnt this site a brownfield/wasteland site a few years ago?
There's wildlife in Derby?!
Who is it who is pushing so hard for this development?
Wearing a slightly ironic tin-foil hat, I could suggest its a false-flag job intended to make people even more hostile to cyclists than they generally are!
On the face of it, sounds like a bad idea in any case. If its a nature reserve, then why not, er, reserve it for nature? The way these things usually work once a precedent has been set for development a lot more will follow.
To be fair is it the right place to build a circuit?
mind you they don't do themselves any favours blaming the weather!