Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

1 in 10 cyclists jump red lights, says Sunday Times

Highest levels found at Manchester junction identified as city's most dangerous for riders...

Just one in ten cyclists jump red lights in rush hour, according to a survey of six junctions in three major cities – London, Manchester and Birmingham – conducted by The Sunday Times [£]. One junction in Manchester had the highest proportion of riders riding through red traffic lights, while at a location in Birmingham, not one cyclist did so.

The newspaper monitored a total of 777 cyclists at the junctions concerned between 7.30am and 8.30am on Wednesday and Thursday morning last week, with 78 breaking the law either by riding through a red light or, in some instances, mounting the pavement to get around it.

Here are the junctions surveyed, together with the total number of cyclists and the percentage of them that rode through a red light.

November 6
                                         No. of   % ignore   
                                        cyclists  red light
London
Threadneedle Street/Mansion House Street  160        6.9

Manchester
Moseley Road/Wilmslow Road                138       13.8

Birmingham
Alcester Road/Wake Green Road              38       15.8*

* One cyclist rode through red light; five others mounted pavement

November 7

London
Aldgate/Leadenhall Street                 253      12.3

Manchester
Whitworth Street/Oxford Road              160       6.9

Birmingham 
Smallbrook Queensway/Hurst Street          16         0*

* 8.00am-8.30am

According to the newspaper, “in Manchester almost one in seven people were willing to run a red light in order to steal a march on motorists.”

It’s likely, however, that some ignore red traffic lights for safety reasons; last year that very junction, where Wilmslow Road meets Moseley Road, was named the most dangerous for cyclists in the city, with 25 riders injured there since 2006 according to government data analysed by law firm Levenes.

Wilmslow Road, and its Curry Mile in particular, are regularly highlighted by riders and cycling groups as being particularly hazardous to riders.

Daily cycle commuter Andrew Pilling told The Sunday Times that most cyclists at the junction did comply with the law, adding: “I’d say the main problem is cars and vans cutting across [you], not looking for people on their bikes. As a cyclist you have to be careful. If I was hit by a car, it’d be me that came off worse.”

In April this year, Manchester City Council said that the very junction on Wilmslow Road surveyed by The Sunday Times would be the first to benefit from £200,000 investment aimed at improving the safety of cyclists including cycle lanes and cycle-only traffic light phases. The works are due to be completed by next March.

At the time, Manchester Wheelers vice-president Viv Slack told the website Mancunian Matters: “The Wilmslow Road area is a popular route for many cyclists but always feels fairly dangerous with cars and buses pulling in and out of parking spaces and side roads, often without checking mirrors or indicating.”

In Birmingham – where the low number of cyclists also highlights how that city lags behind London and Manchester in terms of levels of cycling – only one rider out of 54 actually rode through a red light.

The fact that at one junction in the West Midlands city, five others felt the need the pavement to avoid a red light and turn left suggests that its existing layout does not take account of the way cyclists negotiate it.

The Sunday Times also commissioned a survey from YouGov that showed that one in four cyclists – 24 per cent –  “ think it is acceptable to go through a red light if they can see the way ahead is clear” and around one in five – 18 per cent – admitted having “jumped a traffic light in the past six months.”

Headline figures in such polls are often misinterpreted, leading to the impression that red light jumping among cyclists is more common than it actually is since, in this example, for instance, it would include those who regularly ride through red lights, as well as people who might do so just once or twice a year.

Six in ten of all the people polled, including those who don’t ride, said that they believed “it was common for cyclists to run a red light,” and nearly eight in ten – 78 per cent – agreed that those doing so should be prosecuted.

Roger Geffen, campaigns and police director at national cyclists’ organisation CTC, told The Sunday Times that there were some junctions “where it’s safer in practice” for riders to ignore red traffic lights due to the danger posed by other vehicles.

“The solution, however, is not to condone red light- jumping,” he added. “It’s to redesign the junction so that cyclists do not get put in a situation where there’s a conflict between what is safe and what is legal.”

While a look at the comments section of any local newspaper story into cycling will reveal plenty of comments attacking riders who jump red lights as presenting a danger to other road users, as will as allegations that everyone on bikes does do it, such behaviour is a factor in just 2 per cent of incidents in which a cyclist is seriously injured.

That was the finding of a 2009 Transport Research Laboratory study into police reports compiled for official government road casualty statistics. The most common causes of a cyclist being seriously injured were motorists failing to look properly, or a cyclist being driven into from behind.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

50 comments

Avatar
Kadenz | 10 years ago
0 likes

I commute to work in Oxford and every day see lots of cyclists jumping red lights (though most do not) - and far more of them do it than drivers.

And it's never because its safer to do so, but because they can't be bothered to wait and know they can get away with it.

Avatar
Skylark | 10 years ago
0 likes

Amazing the way the British have discovered cycling through towns and cities. As if cycling was only invented in the last 10 years or so.

Avatar
BigBear63 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I drive, ride motorbikes and cycle. Only on the latter do I filter through/jump red lights. I don't do it all the time, mainly on my racer to avoid unclipping but only when turning left or going straight on at T-junctions. Occasionally, when drivers block my path, do I go off road and only when there are no pedestrians. I wish I could avoid my bad behaviour but I feel I need to make some difficult choices to stay in one piece and continue cycling. Better junction design, the ability to be treated the same as a pedestrian in more places is the best solution. The right to filter left or cycle through pedestrian crossings would help.

The fact that only 10% jump red lights should be seen as reason to relax the traffic laws not tighten them.

The effort to make cyclists comparable to motor vehicles, by some fuckwits, is worrying. Cyclists are more like pedestrians. Always have been. Always will be. We have understood that fact for over 100 years so what has changed? Nothing as far as I can see.

Avatar
shaun finnis | 10 years ago
0 likes

Whether it's a car, train, aircraft, boat, HGV, motorcycle, cyclist or pedestrian. Red = Do not pass, Green = proceed with caution only if your way is clear. See its so easy and people will live longer too!

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to shaun finnis | 10 years ago
0 likes
shaun finnis wrote:

Whether it's a car, train, aircraft, boat, HGV, motorcycle, cyclist or pedestrian. Red = Do not pass, Green = proceed with caution only if your way is clear. See its so easy and people will live longer too!

Nope. Not if you are a pedestrian. Both legally and morally pedestrians are not obliged to obey lights.

Looking before crossing, and not wandering out into the road while staring at your phone with your headphones in and your back to the direction of traffic - yeah, that's a pretty good idea. And also...joggers...I don't care that you deludedly imagine the road as being 'softer' than the pavement, please don't jog in it!

But there's no obligation for pedestrians to obey lights, no such crime as 'jaywalking', and nor should there be.

Even as a cyclist I think pedestrians ultimately have priority (though it would be nice if they gave cyclists the same respect they give motorists).

Avatar
iL Soigneur | 10 years ago
0 likes

1 in 10 they say. They must have all been in Bristol that day.

Every set of red lights I stopped at today had at least 1 or 2 cyclists ride through.

At some junctions in Bristol you get shouted at by other cyclists for stopping at red lights.

Avatar
sean1 | 10 years ago
0 likes

What I find odd is that given this survey, and other similar articles, there would appear to be a lot of cyclists jumping red lights, particularly in urban cities.

So I would expect, given that this RLJ behaviour is regarded as 'dangerous' there would therefore be a corresponding high number of road casualty statistics to go with this.

However I cannot find any evidence that RLJ is causing many accidents.

The Rospa survey doesn't highlight this as an issue or significant factor in cycling incidents.

http://www.rospa.com/roadsafety/adviceandinformation/cycling/facts-figur...

So my conclusion is that although RLJ does take place, the vast majority of the time it is done without undue risk.

Personally I always stop and wait at a red light.

If anything this common behaviour suggests the design of the junction could be improved for cyclists, e.g. with advance go lights for cyclists, left filter arrows for cyclists, etc.

Avatar
giff77 | 10 years ago
0 likes

On the way home from work a 4x4 and I rolled up to a red light together. I stopped at the line the driver meanwhile continued to roll their car forward whilst riding their clutch. I shouts at them and pointed at the line. They roll down the window to snarl at me. I tell them they're well over the line and and their bumper is now over the studs for the crossing. I get a shrug and the window goes back up. Needless to say when we got the green I was away quicker than they were.

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

Traffic light controlled junctions in our cities are generally a pretty lawless environment. ASLs are usually occupied by cars, vehicles mount the kerb to sqeeze though gaps that don't exist and all types of users RLJ.

Until there is some real enforcement of the rules this will not change and as vunerable road users we should simply do what we feel best to stay safe as long as we don't endanger other vunerable users (pedestians). RLJing because you're in a hury is dumb, crossing the stop line to get ahead of the car blocking the ASL is rather different.

Avatar
davezac | 10 years ago
0 likes

Interestingly, that is the junction where i was 'doored'. I was travelling towards manchester, outside the current Tesco store. Whilst within the painted 'Cycle lane', i was undertaking stationary traffic at said lights.
However one passenger couldnt wait to get into Tesco and nearly knocked me unconscious.
I try not to go through red lights - but it is circumstances like this that make cyclists behave this way.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 10 years ago
0 likes

It should be 1 in 10 city cyclists jump red lights. I got hit crossing at traffic lights by a cyclist riding the wrong way up a one way in covent garden. He got a slap and a load of verbal, poncy hipster on his stupid crime against cycling narrow bar fixie.

You don't see it much elsewhere, but I suspect if you did the same survey for cars it would be a similar figure. City cyclists need to sit up and take a lesson from us sensible country dwellers.

Avatar
spatuluk | 10 years ago
0 likes

Weird choices to observe red light jumping in Manchester.. Oxford/Whitworth is at the top of a hill, with a lot of RLJing taxis and buses, and pedestrians who're eager to leap into the road as soon as the lights go red. You'd have to be suicidal to jump Mosley/Wilmslow, but you do get people riding off *just* before the lights change, which I suppose counts. That's more of a safety move, as waiting for the lights is more dangerous.

The stretch of road in between the two junctions is full of red light jumpers, especially through the curry mile. I often follow serial RLJers (on my bike, and no I don't RLJ) from the Wilmslow junction to the Whitworth junction, and they jump every single light, but they don't jump the two surveyed.

If they'd surveyed Oxford Road/Grosvenor Street, or Wilmslow Road/Dickenson Road, the figure would've been more like 6 out of 10 cyclists jumping the lights. Some might say "oh, that's just the students". If that's the case, then there's a lot of middle-aged students these days..

Avatar
ribena | 10 years ago
0 likes

All of the "it seems too low" comments are just describing the effects of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

And car drivers law breaking IS relevant.

The usual comments of cyclists all being law breakers are often used as justifcation in blaming cyclists when theres an accident and also in arguing against safer facilities (they don't deserve it etc.). This provides evidence that cyclists really don't act too differently to any other road user.

This isn't saying that such behaviour is okay, just that it maikes no sense in singling out the rule-breaking behaviour of one group lumped together simply by the fact they happened to be using the same form of transport.

I'm not sure where the self-reported figure comes from? The only thing i can think of is the IAM study (carried out on its own website).... http://road.cc/content/news/58339-cycle-campaigners-see-red-over-aim-red...

If you add up the Yes-Somtimes and Yes-Frequently figues its not too dissimilar to the Times result.

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 10 years ago
0 likes

Just now, someone just forced a little girl and her mum off the zebra crossing outside the nursery on Guilford St. Every time that happens, it's one more person who isn't on our side. Nobody cares about stats. Only 6 RLJs on Theobalds this morning though (ah..still over 25%!)

Avatar
eurotrash | 10 years ago
0 likes

I don't know why everyone gets so butthurt every time there's talk of cyclists RLJing. "But how many motorists do it?" That's irrelevant, this is about cyclists.

From my experience of cycling in London, that figure is too low. It depends though - in central London you'll see a much higher percentage RLJing. When I happen to commute early enough to see lots of other fellow commuting cyclists, around Clapham Common, the vast majority (more than 90%) don't RLJ. That's just my experience.

This afternoon on my Sunday ride, there were very few cyclists going in my direction. Two didn't RLJ. I noticed at least 5+ who did.

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'm surprised by the comment about Oxford, I was there for the day on Friday and didn't see any cyclists jump a red light.

In Manchester city centre I rarely see any rider stop at one.

Avatar
farrell replied to Kapelmuur | 10 years ago
0 likes
Crosshouses wrote:

I'm surprised by the comment about Oxford, I was there for the day on Friday and didn't see any cyclists jump a red light.

In Manchester city centre I rarely see any rider stop at one.

If cyclists rarely stop then I'd love to know exactly who the fuck it is I'm talking to when stopped at red lights then.

Avatar
Stumps replied to farrell | 10 years ago
0 likes
farrell wrote:
Crosshouses wrote:

I'm surprised by the comment about Oxford, I was there for the day on Friday and didn't see any cyclists jump a red light.

In Manchester city centre I rarely see any rider stop at one.

If cyclists rarely stop then I'd love to know exactly who the fuck it is I'm talking to when stopped at red lights then.

If your seeing people who aren't there i'm sure there is someone you can talk to about it  21

Avatar
farrell replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:
farrell wrote:
Crosshouses wrote:

I'm surprised by the comment about Oxford, I was there for the day on Friday and didn't see any cyclists jump a red light.

In Manchester city centre I rarely see any rider stop at one.

If cyclists rarely stop then I'd love to know exactly who the fuck it is I'm talking to when stopped at red lights then.

If your seeing people who aren't there i'm sure there is someone you can talk to about it  21

You mean...
http://thumbs1.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/mE8qcZ-dT0uAideV-bLDgcQ.jpg

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 10 years ago
0 likes

I've never RLJed. I drove back from Richmond Park to WC1 and saw 5 or 6 cars do it within 10 miles. Crossing Theobalds Rd on foot, at least 25% of cyclists do it at rush hour.

Avatar
stefv | 10 years ago
0 likes

The vast majority of cyclists in London do not jump red lights - that's if you don't count those who can't to a trackstand, but nevertheless refuse to unlcip and attempt one so roll into the middle of the pedestrian crossing and then can't actually see when the lights turn green, but I digress....

What I wanted to say was it would be great to start a Flickr album with photos of cyclists waiting patiently at red lights. I've not got a point and shoot anymore and my phone is too fiddly to take pictures at short notice, but I think it would be a great album.

Avatar
John_the_Monkey | 10 years ago
0 likes

Shame they didn't stake out Manchester's Fairfield Road/London Road junction, by Piccadilly Station. Red light jumping by cars (and busses, and taxis) is endemic there, on the pedestrian crossing phase usually.

Cyclists might be as bad (although I see very little RLJ by them on my commute into Manchester) they're a hell of a lot easier to step out of the way of than a bus.

Avatar
farrell replied to John_the_Monkey | 10 years ago
0 likes
John_the_Monkey wrote:

Shame they didn't stake out Manchester's Fairfield Road/London Road junction, by Piccadilly Station. Red light jumping by cars (and busses, and taxis) is endemic there, on the pedestrian crossing phase usually.

Cyclists might be as bad (although I see very little RLJ by them on my commute into Manchester) they're a hell of a lot easier to step out of the way of than a bus.

I have never seen a phase of red lights go past without being jumped on that junction by a motor vehicle. And that includes sitting having a few pints in the Bulls Head and looking out of the window watching it. I know that seems sad but when I'm near there I watch to see if I will ever be proved wrong. I also enjoy showing new people this phenomenon.

GMP know full well about this junction and simply don't care.

Avatar
OldnSlo | 10 years ago
0 likes

My experience of working in the waterloo area was that... its true and you took life in your hands when attempting to cross on a zebra crossing. Mainly from clipped in riders not wanting to stop, which i can appreciate but still.

Avatar
banzicyclist2 | 10 years ago
0 likes

There is no excuse for running a red light . . . period IMO ! It's just plain crazy and sighting the fact that others eg. motorists do it does not justify doing it yourself.

The rules are there for a reason and if everyone ignores them just imagine how dangerous it would be to venture out onto the road then. It is everyones responsibility to ride within the rules. Ride hard and fast by all means, l certainly do ... all the time.. But I always ride within the rules to the best of my ability.

I have friends who have have run red lights infront of me and I always take them to task over it. If we all aimed to set a standard then we could criticise other road users with a dear concience, until then we're just hipocites.

Sorry if my spellings a bit strange ..... I'm using a handwriting interpretation app which seems pretty good even with my scroll.

Avatar
hairyairey replied to banzicyclist2 | 10 years ago
0 likes

So how long are you going to wait at a set of lights that only change with the presence of a motor vehicle? Minutes? Hours? (it's entirely possible)

What about trying to evade an abusive motorist too?

At certain times of day come traffic lights need to be give way only - there's no point in waiting when nothing is coming the other way and you can see that there isn't.

Avatar
Rouboy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Cars and cycles jump red lights, yep fore gone conclusion. Right or wrong well that will always be the debate.
Stand and watch any pedestrian crossing and then tell me who disregards the respective red lights then?
I bet the pedestrian will come out the full on serial offender.

Avatar
jamiemfranklin | 10 years ago
0 likes

This seems like a low estimate but that is because a statistic has been misused (again). In order to actually determine that "1-in-10 cyclists jump red lights" you need to follow a population of cyclists for enough time to determine each of their behaviour at red lights i.e. through an ENTIRE journey (or longer).

What they have shown is that the probability of a cyclist jumping ANY GIVEN RED LIGHT is 1-in-10. This means that the number of cyclists who jump red lights will be quite a lot higher. In fact their observations remain compatible with the possibility that all cyclists jump red lights (although I suspect it will actually be a number somewhere between 50% and the self reported 18%).

This is compatible with behavior observed during my commute across Oxford (by bike) every day.

Avatar
Ush replied to jamiemfranklin | 10 years ago
0 likes
jamiemfranklin wrote:

In order to actually determine that "1-in-10 cyclists jump red lights" you need to follow a population of cyclists for enough time to determine each of their behaviour at red lights i.e. through an ENTIRE journey (or longer) ... behavior observed during my commute across Oxford (by bike) every day.

So there you have it, if you live in Oxford you will have been followed home by some strange bloke on a bike. Now you know who it is, and if you didn't notice, don't worry, he followed you anyway.

Avatar
jmaccelari | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'd say much higher than 1:10 from my experience in London. Probably closer to1:3.

Pages

Latest Comments