- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
forum
Tyres - quick poll - wider up front, or in the rear?
Thread prompted by a comment earlier on - can I poll road.cc members, which way round they put their tyres? (I'm a bit obsessed with rolling rubber!).
25 or 28mm or perhaps a combination of both f/r are perfect for most people.
Indeed - but which way round? IIRC i read an article advocating the wider tyre up front to help with cornering, with the narrower at the back. Where was it?
Oh - as always, it's Sheldon Brown -
http://sheldonbrown.com/tyres.html
"Mixing/Matching Tyres" section makes the case for both:
" Narrower Front, Wider Rear
If lightness is the primary goal, tyre width/weight is limited by the risk of pinch cut flats, a.k.a. "snake bites." Since there is more weight carried on the rear tyre, you can get away with a slightly narrower tyre in front than you can in back.
Wider Front, Narrower Rear
A wider front tyre makes sense in many applications, however, when handling and ride comfort are considered. A wider tyre will generally provide better cornering traction than a narrower one, assuming appropriate inflation pressure.
"
So could you put in the comments which way round you do it? If you stick to using the greater than symbol it'll be clear:
E.g.
F>R
(Front wider than rear)
R>F
(Rear wider than front).
If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.
Latest Forum Topics
Latest Comments
- ubercurmudgeon 1 sec ago
Kona makes practical, affordable commuter bikes and goes bust. Colnago makes toys for the affluent and it is booming. Just goes to show that the...
- Kendalred 10 sec ago
Harrogate innit. Too posh to push(bike)....
- brooksby 31 min 48 sec ago
Yes - you keep them in a box, buried in the ground with an X on a map to mark the spot
- BIRMINGHAMisaDUMP 1 hour 17 min ago
Bro needs to be in primary position.
- Mathemagician 1 hour 19 min ago
To answer your question, yes you can sometimes feel the difference. Built a set of wheels for a friend and he installed them with new lightweight...
- Geordiepeddeler 7 hours 58 min ago
Cycling infrastructure does not force drivers to break the law, drivers are the reason they break the law, no one else.
- chrisonabike 8 hours 10 min ago
Ah but taking pictures of things to defy the man (avoid a fine) is righteous. Taking pictures of people to grass on them to the cops (perhaps...
- jaysa 11 hours 21 min ago
As a woman, this works great for me! My chain broke once, and a kind guy stopped with a chain breaker and sorted it all out for me. We stopped at a...
- andystow 12 hours 12 min ago
Same. I also have gone through a bunch of their tyres, and only the extralight disappointed (torn sidewall) but the standards are fantastic....
Add new comment
8 comments
On a mtb wider on the front is common for grip/comfort. I sometimes have 2.2 front 2.0 rear.
On my TT bike I run 22 on the front for aero reasons 23 on the back.
On my road bike always 23.
I would never put a worn tyre on the front. Cornering when the tread has gone flat is a crappy idea.
daft idea for the same reason as on cars - you are going to adversely effect the balance and handling of the bike.
you might be putting more weight on the back one but its the front one that takes the shocks on hitting potholes or
If you want more comfort, you can let a little air out of the tyres, or go up a size.
Or look at more comfortably frames rather than stiff road bike ones like those designed for audax
Like bikeboy, I run the same width tyre front & rear. Never felt the need to change it but if I did I would run fatter tyres both ends for comfort.
Similarly, if I wanted more traction on the front I'd use a wider, gripper tyre at a lower pressure.... and the same for the rear.
I've got 25 front, 23 rear. That's mainly because I wanted to go up to 25 but found it wouldn't fit in the rear when I'd already put the front one on, but the rationale for it in the Sheldon quite above makes sense to me.
I um buy two tyres that are the same size. If the rear is getting over worn I swap them around before buying new ones. Have I been doing it wrong all these years?
Sheldon says yes, you're doing it wrong. You really don't want an older, worn tyre on the front, because if it blows out, you'll probably crash.
A rear blowout is less life-threatening (just ask my wife, who held her nerve - and the bike upright - when she had a rear blowout on a big descent).
He does say you can swap a worn front tyre to the rear, when it eventually wears down a bit, and always fit your newest tyre in front (if you can be bothered to do it this way), but not the other way around.
I don't think I could ever do this, it just feels too ugly in my mind.
A sure sign that in 2-3 years this is exactly what I'll be doing.
Depends on what you want to achieve.
I ride R>F on my road bike and F>R on my commuter.
R>F is for comfort on long rides.
F>R is done mainly to avoid snake-bites - I usually get them in my front wheel while I usually manage to avoid hitting potholes with the rear wheel.
So here it is! 1:1 in my case.