- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
forum
How long are your legs?!
Does it matter how long legs a cyclist have?
If a person has longer legs compared to stature than averege it means that more of your total body weight will be used to spin those pedals. Or..?
Would be interesting to know if there is a realistic difference.
According to anthropometric data of 11'000 american soldiers from 1988 your legs should statistically be around 46-48% of your total stature - for men and women.
That means measuring the height from the floor right up to your crotch (be careful with those family jewels)
Come on, I know you are going to check. 
That concludes this weeks cycling math! 
If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.
Latest Forum Topics
Latest Comments
- froze 9 min 19 sec ago
This was a very good listing of bikes for under 1,000....
- Hirsute 3 hours 30 min ago
Radar tells me their closing speed, if they are slowing and how far away. Then I decide to say a prayer. The change of light pattern is incidental.
- lonpfrb 3 hours 50 min ago
Quite so, which is why our village 20mph zone covers the whole residential extent. Of course, enforcement is another thing..
- lonpfrb 4 hours 16 min ago
No, that's very doubtful while proper testing would be fully destructive.
- don simon fbpe 5 hours 30 min ago
What's wrong with dropping down on to the Millenium Bridge, or the swing bridge, then the brief, but satisfying climb back up the hill? #training....
- chrisonabike 6 hours 11 min ago
The relatives might of course disagree, but in general I'd countenance a relatively light sentence* if only we could fix it so that those who...
- ktache 6 hours 50 min ago
Id forgotten that I got a second hand set of project two's for my getting to work bike over twenty years back.
- Veganpotter 7 hours 47 min ago
My bet is that all these tires popping off are from people with bad pressure gauges or they're simply just putting too much air in on purpose. ...
- chrisonabike 9 hours 3 min ago
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...
Add new comment
11 comments
my legs come out at 51% , I'm 166cm tall with 85cm legs...
It's complicated. Women have longer thighs and shorter calves than men. The thighs are used more in pushing down and the calves in pulling up. The latter only being effective if you are bound to the pedals in some way. I have short legs and a long back but the thing preventing me from adopting a aerodynamic position is not my leg to height ratio, it's my waist to chest ratio.
My legs are different lengths - by about 0.4 cm. Its enough to cause problems. Any body else?
I have read that women have proportionately longer legs than men (proportionate to their height). Women are significantly shorter than men on average, of course, so legs are generally shorter too, despite the higher leg to torso ratio. Don't know what relevance this does or does not have for cycling, though.
I remember an interview a few years ago with either Dave Zabriskie or Christian Vandevelde who said that he can get into a more aero TT position because he has a long back and short legs.
No, not really.
And anyway what can you do about it? Nothing. Just work with what you have inherited from your parents / play to your strengths. And anyway statistics can deceive, just ask the World Champion.
Usually us Euroes are a bit taller than Americans, though I assume our body proportions would be about the same. Though since I don't have any data on that, I don't know
Your right about that math there:P
Mine are about 46%
Would be fun to see if somebody who has cycled actively since they where in their teens have gotten longer legs by evolution
Not exactly evolution. That's Lamarckism right there - not a bad idea but unfortunately a wrong one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inheritance_of_acquired_characteristics
Hmmmm, 45.71% my legs are, i just divided my trouser leg length by my height and multiplied it by 100, thats right aint it?
ALSO, thats American soldiers its based on, European men are different aren't they?
i thought most americans were just phat as fook lol
can they see there legs 
i thought most americans were just phat as fook lol
can they see there legs 