Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

One week to save key London cycle route, warn campaigners

Doubling of the Tavistock Place cycle track has seen a 65% increase in cyclists at peak times, with a 21% decrease in Nitrogen Dioxide

Cyclists are being urged to voice their support for one of London’s busiest cycle routes before the end of the week, after campaigners warned the route is under threat from lobbying by the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association.

The Tavistock Place cycle route in Camden, which is used by thousands of cyclists per day, was doubled in width in November 2015 for a 12 month trial period, making the road one way for motor traffic after the existing two-way bike track became overcrowded.

A consultation on the future of the route ends this Friday, and the Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Association is campaigning to return the road to two-way for motor traffic, claiming it is creating congestion and pollution on surrounding roads and slowing taxi journeys along the route.

Popular London bike route to double in capacity for year-long trial

The London Cycling Campaign’s Infrastructure Campaigner, Simon Munk, said although Camden Council proposed the scheme and support it, if the overwhelming majority of people are against the scheme, “that’s going to be very hard for them to move forward.”

“I think everyone should be worried about it, I absolutely think there is no foregone conclusion here,” he said.

The cycle route, which runs East from Tottenham Court Road towards Islington, was doubled last year from a 2m wide two-way cycle track (1.75m at its narrowest) to two 2m temporary tracks, one in each direction. Before the trial around 43 per cent of traffic was cycles, 13 per cent motor traffic, and there were a high number of collisions on the route, between motor vehicles and both cyclists and pedestrians, which Camden Council hoped the changes would improve.

Since the new layout was introduced there was a 65 per cent increase in cyclists on parts of the route, and up to a 21 per cent decrease in Nitrogen Dioxide levels, one of the key air pollutants of concern in Central London.

Torrington Place infographic.jpg

 

However, taxi drivers have vociferously protested the changes, which they say are exacerbating congestion and pollution on surrounding roads. They set up a petition, which has received just over 200 signatures.

The LTDA petition states: "We would like to see congestion and pollution reduce across the whole area rather than transferred from one street on to another, as the measures currently do. 

"Besides submitting a formal consultation response we have launched a petition to ask Camden Council to reconsider their proposals in order to provide a two way motor route on Tavistock Place and Torrington place." 

Munk, who is critical of the LTDA's stance, said: “It’s not the scheme that’s causing the issue, it is the huge amount of through traffic. Tavistock Place [cycle scheme] isn’t the cause, of that, it is part of the solution.” 

“The idea that the way it was before is better is ludicrous, the idea that we can fit thousands more cyclists into half the space.”

“What seems to be happening is the LTDA and cabbies are basically saying improvements to cyclist and pedestrian safety to a hugely popular route are trumped by cabbies having a minor inconvenience.”

Taxi drivers association dubbed "duplicitous" on anti-bike stance

Munk called the LTDA “duplicitous” last week after General Secretary, Steve McNamara, publicly said, at the launch of a joint LCC and LTDA statement to reduce cyclist casualties, the organisation did not oppose bike lanes, hours before LTDA launched a campaign against the route.

Torrington Place bike lane trial Camden.png

 

“It’s time for them to be clear and honest: if they support cycle tracks they need to get behind Tavistock Place, and if they don’t they need to come out and say it,” said Munk.

Members of Camden Cyclists are out on the route daily talking to cyclists and pedestrians, as well as universities, residents associations and businesses. Munk said there is “an awful lot of support” from “people who use it and recognise day in day out the benefits”. 

“It’s not a done deal that the scheme will happen,” he said. “It’s really important for people to respond to the consultation.”

The LTDA told road.cc it believes the LCC is misrepresenting the LTDA position on Tavistock Place and another route its drivers are protesting in North London, Cycle Superhighway 11.

Richard Massett of the LTDA, said: “The LTDA remains committed to the Safer in the City campaign and the wider work the LTDA is doing alongside the LCC such as the campaign launched earlier this year regarding air pollution.

"At Tavistock Place and on CS11 the LTDA believe a better balance can be reached between space for cycling and the needs of residents, businesses and other road users at these locations.”

However, Massett has not responded to a request to clarify how the LCC misrepresented the LTDA's stance or what he means by a better balance.

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Edgeley | 7 years ago
0 likes

The area around here has bike jams every morning and evening.    Cycling is incredibly popular.

Even to think about reducing bike provision so that bloody black cabs can have a more direct route makes me angry.

 

Avatar
mtpereira | 7 years ago
0 likes

Please do not forget to respond to this questionnaire: https://consultations.wearecamden.org/corporate-services/torrington-plac...

Avatar
WillRod | 7 years ago
1 like

The infographic showing the modes of transport and their allocated space explains it all.

The least used form of transport currently has the biggest share of the space and is the only one causing pollution, it is also the one that contributes most to congestion.

 

Also, they need to start charging cabbies for the congestion and pollution they cause. As a non-Londoner, I am amazed at the public transport options. I always use other forms of public transport when visiting London, because although the tube is busy, it is cheaper and quicker than a cab. The only people who need to use a cab in London are the elderly and disabled, or for journeys around the edge of the city.

Avatar
EddyBerckx replied to WillRod | 7 years ago
0 likes

WillRod wrote:

...

The only people who need to use a cab in London are the elderly and disabled, or for journeys around the edge of the city.

The only people who need and can afford a cab are the rich elderly and the rich disabled...

Avatar
muppetteer replied to WillRod | 7 years ago
0 likes

WillRod wrote:

 

Also, they need to start charging cabbies for the congestion and pollution they cause. As a non-Londoner, I am amazed at the public transport options. I always use other forms of public transport when visiting London, because although the tube is busy, it is cheaper and quicker than a cab. The only people who need to use a cab in London are the elderly and disabled, or for journeys around the edge of the city.

 

Alas, it will never happen. Cabbies are a monopoly of 25,000 self centered people who have a completely disproportinate for their size strangle hold on London. They're one of the only truely protected industries in the UK, where there is no fair competition or market forces allowed. The sooner they are gone, the better for everybody. 

Avatar
flathunt | 7 years ago
1 like

I love that the LTDA has setup a petition and has so far managed to get 200 out of 26,000 scabbies to sign it, presumably the rest are too busy filming cyclists on the road.

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like

So presumably a campaign needs to be launched to return the road to one-way for motor traffic (once they inevitably bow to the wishes of the LTDA), claiming it is creating congestion and pollution on that road and is slowing cycle journeys along the route.

Avatar
srchar | 7 years ago
2 likes

Why do taxi drivers have so much influence over transport policy? Such a minority of road users and so expensive they only carry a very well off segment of society these days. Hardly "public transport".

Avatar
zanf replied to srchar | 7 years ago
0 likes

srchar wrote:

Why do taxi drivers have so much influence over transport policy? Such a minority of road users and so expensive they only carry a very well off segment of society these days. Hardly "public transport".

The question also needs to be asked why bus companies have so much influence over TfL as well (its full of guys with links to the bus companies for a start), and their answer to any problem is to put more buses on the roads, yet refuse to release all collision information or even consider a rationalisation of routes.

As for the LTDA, the LCC were prize mugs for even considering running joint campaigns with them, but the LCC have always been a bunch of muppets.

The scheme on Tavistock Place needs to be supported AND expanded as air quality has improved by 21% while 66% of households in Camden do not even have access to a car [PDF Link] so its mostly not even the locals driving around there.

 

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
1 like

It's good to raise this issue, and with luck, it will result in more people expressing their support for the cycle lanes.

I've noticed in a few Laura Laker articles that people protest things, rather than protesting against them. I think people protest things in America. Perhaps LL is American, or there's an American readership of road.cc. I prefer the English English to the American English.

Latest Comments