Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bikejacking victim went to hospital in an Uber after 999 said broken leg not serious enough

Cyclist left lying in towpath after violent bikejacking that fractured his shin

A cyclist whose leg was broken when he was the victim of a bike jacking in north London was forced to call an Uber minicab to get to hospital when 999 controllers told him he wasn’t allowed an ambulance.

Paul Mullan, 32, was attacked by three masked men and pulled off his bicycle. He dialled 999 as he lay on the River Lea towpath near Tottenham but controllers told him to hang up and dial 111 for non-serious injuries.

Three police officers eventually came to his aid and drove him home, where he called an Uber to take him to A&E where his broken shinbone became obvious.

Paul told the Evening Standard: “I don’t know why they couldn’t send me an ambulance or doctor.

"That is the most disappointing thing. At the time I was incredulous. I’m always a defender of the NHS but I want to know why they didn’t listen to my call properly.

“They said, ‘Describe what is wrong with you’. I’m lying flat on my face. I’ve been hauled off my bike. I can’t move. I knew my leg was gone.”

Police have appealed for witnesses as they issued descriptions of the attackers, all black. One is tall, aged 18-20 and wore a burgundy bandana over his face, another of the same age had Afro-style hair and wore a black jacket and a short youth aged about 16 had a Somali appearance and wore a black bomber jacket and blue jeans.

London Ambulance Service said: “From the information given us, the patient was conscious and alert and had no immediately life-threatening injuries. We will work with him to review this case and are sorry if we have contributed to an already very distressing experience.”

Just last month we reported how an average of 10 cyclists in London are being mugged for their bicycle every week, according to the Metropolitan Police, highlighting the growth of what is termed ‘bike-jacking.’

The figures, obtained by BBC News London, show that as many incidents of riders in the capital being intimidated into handing over their bikes were recorded in the last 12 months than in the previous two years.

Police say that many of the 550 incidents involved cyclists attacked on quiet paths at night.

Chief Inspector Mike West of the Metropolitan Police commented: "We scan every day for crimes of note and if we pick up on any trends or analysis which would lead us to a hot spot area to deal with crime then that's what we'll do.

"We'll match our resources to where the problems are and you'll generally see an increased uniformed presence."

In March, the founder of a charity that aims to teach young people skills to help them avoid becoming victims of street crime said that older children were stealing bikes from younger ones, sometimes as part of gang initiation.

Nathaniel Peat, who set up the charity The Safety Box, said: “Often the way [cyclists] dress suggests they might have money which means the bike they’re riding is valuable.

"They wear high-end brands. The kids can tell somebody that’s picked up a top from Primark apart from Zara,” Mr Peat said.

“A lot of young people in affluent areas wear jumpers. In the community [lower socio-economic areas], they’re wearing hoodies.

"Young people can see the difference and can read somebody from the way they dress or the bike that they’re riding.”

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
gareth2510 | 8 years ago
0 likes

So the police drove him home and not a&e??? Is it me or could the cyclist have said his 'leg really hurt, i cant put any wait on it and Im concerned..please could you take me to a&e' ??
Even better, could the police not have thought they had best get him checked over and drive him to a&e rather than home??

Avatar
Joeinpoole | 8 years ago
0 likes

How come this story has been 'disappeared' from the News?

Avatar
mike_ibcyclist | 8 years ago
0 likes

First up, any news on the perpetrators of the assault? Bastards.

Secondly, I used to feel sorry for people who think that the NHS is this huge all embracing nanny that helps everyone. They're like dark ages Christians placing their faith in a local priest to cure the plague with prayer. The NHS has become this quasi religious movement that fails to recognise that universal healthcare is a myth or worse, an oxymoron. Sorry . . . but thats my two cents. Resume the Danny Boyle led prayers and shovelling of money into the beast.

Avatar
Joeinpoole | 8 years ago
0 likes

I don't think an ambulance was required. This was not an emergency. His life wasn't in danger, his condition wasn't so critical that minutes mattered and he didn't need to tie up a high-tech vehicle and a couple of paramedics when they might be more seriously needed elsewhere. An ordinary car/taxi was the appropriate means of transport.

These 'bike-jacking' incidents are of great concern to me though. The increasing trend is worrying and I guess it is likely that they will spread across the country. Would bike insurance pay out in such an incident?

Avatar
giff77 replied to Joeinpoole | 8 years ago
0 likes
Joeinpoole wrote:

I don't think an ambulance was required. This was not an emergency. His life wasn't in danger, his condition wasn't so critical that minutes mattered and he didn't need to tie up a high-tech vehicle and a couple of paramedics when they might be more seriously needed elsewhere. An ordinary car/taxi was the appropriate means of transport.

Early last year I fell and dislocated my ankle resulting in breaking both tibia and fibula. It was decided (by me) that I was driven to hospital. While being helped out of the car a paramedic saw us told us to bring the car to the ambulance bay and returned with a crew of doctors and nurses. I was told by the paramedic that the injury warranted an ambulance and I should have called it in. I'm also surprised that the attending officers neither called for an ambulance or opted to drive the individual to hospital themselves.
Edit. I have absolutely no idea how that emoticon appeared up there and have removed it. Wasn't intentional joe.

Avatar
patto583 replied to Joeinpoole | 8 years ago
0 likes
Joeinpoole wrote:

I don't think an ambulance was required. This was not an emergency. His life wasn't in danger, his condition wasn't so critical that minutes mattered and he didn't need to tie up a high-tech vehicle and a couple of paramedics when they might be more seriously needed elsewhere. An ordinary car/taxi was the appropriate means of transport.

Getting up and walking to the nearest road could have exacerbated the injury, which is why an ambulance was appropriate, as they have the appropriate equipment to cover that journey with minimum risk (a wheelchair) he didn't necessarily need blue lighting, but he needed correct patient transport and medical assessment.

Avatar
Carton | 8 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

They wear high-end brands. The kids can tell somebody that’s picked up a top from Primark apart from Zara.

Was Mr. Peat holding up Zara kit as incitingly ostentatious? Somewhat surprised as though I tend to agree with the implicit advice, if perhaps not the brand reference, I thought public discourse was inching away from "victim blaming".

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 8 years ago
0 likes

I'm not clear, from the tone of the London ambulance service response. Is the policy that ambulances are only for injured people accompanied by someone else to make the call?

In my view having a broken leg bone justifies an ambulance , but they talk only if consciousness and life threatening injuries.

It would be nice to know before I head out on a solo ride. If nothing else I could leave my phone at home, since it is no use to me in the event of a crash.

Avatar
Malaconotus | 8 years ago
0 likes

"We are sorry if", not "We are sorry that"? Apology without any acceptance of blame.

Avatar
joe-irish | 8 years ago
0 likes

Shocking that he was ignored

Latest Comments