Genesis Equilibrium 853 frame & fork  £749.99

8/10

Another very likeable Equilibrium joins the stable. More mile muncher than racer, but none the worse for it .

Weight 2330g   Contact  www.madison.co.uk

by Dave Atkinson   October 2, 2013  

The Genesis Equilbrium was at the head of a steel revival in the UK which has seen a big growth in UK-conditions sportive machines with comfy frames and room for mudguards. This new 853 version is an excellent basis for building a bike that'll last, although its nature with the matching steel fork pushes it more towards Audax territory than its cheaper-tubed siblings.

The original Equilibrium was made from standard Reynolds 520 tubes and was none the worse for it; I've still got one in the original grey livery and although it's a bit knocked about now it's still great fun to ride. The later incarnations have been higher grade tubing, Reynolds 725, but 853 is another significant step up the ladder. Air-hardening at the weld points, and a higher tensile strength than the cheaper steels, it can be used thinner in the frame tubes for a lighter overall weight.

Unlike the other Equilibriums which all sport a colour-matched carbon fork, this frameset comes with a matching steel fork with 853 blades and a classic lugged crown. It's a lovely looking thing, although obviously it's a fair bit heavier than a carbon fork. All in all the frame and fork (with uncut steerer) weigh in at 2.3kg so it's not going to tempt you if you fancy an über-light build but that's never really been the Equilibrium's raison d'être. Even more so here.

I built up the 853 frame with good quality Audax-style kit for most of its testing period: Shimano 105 triple groupset and handbuilt wheels (with a dynamo hub). I stuck some muguards on it too. And I've done a lot of miles on it, including the 400km Brevet Cymru. And it's very nice indeed.

The geometry is definitely sportive and not race; it's not super-high but the shortish 567mm top tube on the 58cm model sits you up a bit. I ran a slightly longer stem than I normaly would to extend the reach a touch (and give me somewhere to stick my Garmin when I was using a bar bag) but it didn't make the steering sluggish at all.

The steel fork is excellent: forgiving, but not at all vague with excellent tracking at speed. Built like this the whole bike is happiest in cruise mode and it's an effective platform for covering long distances at a decent clip. It's great bike for commuting and general use too, albeit a reasonably expensive one.

For balance I also took the rack, 'guards and lights off and fitted some lightweight wheels and the lower overall weight – and reduced rolling weight especially – revealed the sprightliness of the frame to a much greater degree. It's a fun bike in a light build, just as it is a stable platform with heavier components. The core of any bike is the frame and this is a proven frame in a well-regarded material. It doesn't really do anything wrong, and the fork is a good match.

There's very little flex under power; I didn't attach any strain gauges but a direct comparison with the 520-framed Equlibrium suggests it's about the same, or at least not noticeably different in normal use. Certainly it's not like riding a monolithic carbon race bike, the frame does respond to your input with more than just forward motion. But there wasn't any rubbing from transmission or wheels, everything was well within acceptable limits.

It's a comfy frame and fork too. I ran a carbon seatpost which always adds a bit of extra cushioning but with a full alloy cockpit, and on the well-built wheels with the tyres pumped up nice and hard, it's still a great bike for our pock-marked UK tarmac. The fork deals with front end hits and general roughness very effectively, and the frame itself seems to soak up a lot of chatter too, although individual components can also make a big difference there.

The paintjob wasn't to everyone's taste, although it's worth saying that I spoke to people who hadn't liked it when they saw pictures of it on the site, but thought it looked much better in the flesh. The green extends all the way round the bottom of the downtube – it's not a stripe – and the dark grey finish is good quality. That said, I guess they still won't be selling many to Ipswich Town fans.

The only other niggle is the lack of rack mounts. It's easy to get round this with a seat collar that incorporates a rack mounting point, but really the bike should have them added. You're much more likely to stick a rack on this Equlibrium than one of the carbon-framed full bikes. You could easily run it as a nice lightweight tourer.

At £749 for the frame and fork this Equilibrium isn't cheap. It is likely to stay reasonably exclusive though, and it's on a par with other 853 offerings out there and a fair bit cheaper than some. If you're looking for a steel bike for club rides and sportives, its carbon-forked siblings are a better bet. This one works better as a proper mile-muncher, even though it's happy being thrown about a bit. The lack of rack mounts is a niggle, and the paint job is a bit Marmite, but overall it's hard not to like once you get out on the road.

Would I buy one? Well, possibly. But the main problem the Equilibrium 853 faces for me is that you can have the 725-framed version as a frame and fork package for not much more than half what this costs. Okay it's a slightly different offering; with a carbon fork its lines aren't quite as classic, and it's not made of 853, but in pure performance terms it's a brilliant bike. The 853 version certainly isn't twice as good. In fact it isn't really better at all; just different. They're both a great deal of fun to ride. If you want the cachet of 853 and the look of the lugged fork, it's good to now have that option.

Verdict

Another very likeable Equilibrium joins the stable. More mile muncher than racer, but none the worse for it .

road.cc test report

Make and model: Genesis Equilibrium 853 frame + fork

Size tested: 58cm

About the bike

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork
 
8/10

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

Very nicely built and finished.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

Reynolds 853 tubing.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

58cm. 567mm effective top tube. 72°/73.5° head/seat tube. 160mm head tube.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

A great long distance frameset, forgiving but efficient.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

There's a bit of whip in it but it's plenty stiff enough to cope with the power.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Yes, although it's not as linear as a big-section carbon frame.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?

Not an issue.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Neutral.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

Best when cruising, very stable, excellent tracking at speed.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for acceleration:
 
6/10
Rate the bike for sprinting:
 
4/10
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
 
10/10
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for climbing:
 
7/10

The drivetrain

Wheels and tyres

Controls

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes.

Rate the bike overall for performance:
 
8/10
Rate the bike overall for value:
 
7/10

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 40  Height: 190cm  Weight: 102kg

I usually ride: whatever I'm testing...  My best bike is: Genesis Equilibrium with SRAM Apex

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, sportives, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, mtb, Mountain Bike Bog Snorkelling, track

 

7 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Does anyone else look at that colour scheme and think 'spirit level'? No?

Still, lovely bike.

Ghedebrav's picture

posted by Ghedebrav [1103 posts]
3rd October 2013 - 8:47

10 Likes

In the review you say no *mudguard* mounts - I think you mean rack mounts? The thought of a bike like this designed in UK not having mudguard mounts had me gnashing my porridge, but my ire seems unfounded when looking at pics!

Nice bike though Cool

alotronic's picture

posted by alotronic [305 posts]
3rd October 2013 - 9:59

10 Likes

In a perfect world they'd also offer this as a frame & matched carbon fork.

Nice though, and a reasonable price. For a grand you can get an 853 Rourke custom frame & fork, so I guess they need to keep the price down to some extent.

posted by thereandbackagain [155 posts]
3rd October 2013 - 14:06

10 Likes

alotronic wrote:
In the review you say no *mudguard* mounts - I think you mean rack mounts?

yeah, i do Smile

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7503 posts]
5th October 2013 - 20:15

24 Likes

Dave, you've managed to make a beautiful frame into a bit of a functional utility bike. Each to their own, but IMO not doing the fact it's a true 853 with fantastic 853 forks justice. I'd say these frames deserve to be built into something a bit special. They ride beautifully, and I built mine into a bit of a classic. Pictures here http://flic.kr/s/aHsjHCyKn7

posted by MisterT [6 posts]
10th October 2013 - 8:30

14 Likes

MisterT wrote:
Dave, you've managed to make a beautiful frame into a bit of a functional utility bike. Each to their own, but IMO not doing the fact it's a true 853 with fantastic 853 forks justice. I'd say these frames deserve to be built into something a bit special. They ride beautifully, and I built mine into a bit of a classic. Pictures here http://flic.kr/s/aHsjHCyKn7

like i said in the review, i built it up more than once. the fast build was with all the audaxy stuff stripped off and some sub-1500g race wheels. I liked it very much in both builds. I'd still contend that if it's a fast build you want, then the 725 frame and carbon fork is as good a starting point for less cash.

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7503 posts]
10th October 2013 - 8:45

13 Likes

(your build looks pretty sweet though Smile )

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7503 posts]
10th October 2013 - 8:46

13 Likes

road.cc reviews

Latest reviews

7/10
£17.99
October 1, 2014
6/10
£74.99
September 30, 2014
9/10
£475.00
September 29, 2014
8/10
£59.99
September 29, 2014
9/10
£1350.00
September 28, 2014
8/10
£100.00
September 27, 2014
8/10
£80.00
September 27, 2014
7/10
£79.00
September 27, 2014
8/10
£45.00
September 26, 2014
7/10
£10.00
September 26, 2014
9/10
£23.56
September 25, 2014
5/10
£68.99
September 25, 2014
3/10
£59.99
September 24, 2014
10/10
£13.75
September 24, 2014
6/10
£199.00
September 23, 2014
7/10
£69.00
September 22, 2014
9/10
£79.00
September 21, 2014
8/10
£59.99
September 21, 2014
5/10
£39.95
September 20, 2014
8/10
£26.99
September 20, 2014
8/10
£24.99
September 19, 2014
8/10
£89.99
September 18, 2014
6/10
£9.99
September 17, 2014
9/10
£2506.15
September 17, 2014
7/10
£39.99
September 16, 2014
8/10
£20.00
September 16, 2014
9/10
£70.00
September 15, 2014
4/10
£87.99
September 15, 2014
8/10
£32.99
September 14, 2014
5/10
£25.99
September 14, 2014
9/10
£1.79
September 13, 2014
 
1