Louis Garneau Diamond helmet  £129.99

3/10

Well vented, and very comfortable… but retention cradle failed in a crash

Weight 330g   Contact  www.evanscycles.com

by Liam Glen   September 21, 2011  

Louis Garneau Diamond helmet

Louis Garneau's range-topping Diamond helmet looks good, boasts an impressive vent count and is extremely comfortable to wear...however, we had a pretty fundamental problem with ours.

Whilst they are a relatively unknown brand here in the UK, Louis Garneau have been around for over 25 years, starting out as a family garage based operation and growing into a brand capable of taking on the big players in the cycling apparel market.

If you watched the Tour de France, you will have no doubt seen one of Louis Garneau's helmets on the head on 'little Tommy Voeckler' as he lit up the race in the yellow jersey. Interestingly, the Europcar team are using the Quartz model, and not the top of the range Diamond reviewed here.

In the helmet vent count wars, the Louis Garneau Diamond comes out near the top with a wapping 40 vents. Closer inspection, however, reveals that 8 of these are absolutely tiny, what Louis Garneau call 'Venturi Vents'. Wind tunnel testing has supposedly verified the effectiveness of these vents, but I can't help thinking that in real world conditions, they don't noticeably improve airflow; some of them were even covered up by the pads. No matter though, because the other 32 vents are large and well positioned enough to do a great job of cooling down your noggin. Internal channels provide a pathway for the air to flow over the head whilst large rear vents enable the heated air to be expelled. Overall, ventilation is on par with other helmets in this price bracket.

So how does Louis Garneau achieve this vent count whilst retaining the helmet's structural integrity? The Diamond features in-mould construction which fuses the plastic outer shell to the polystyrene moulding, as well as two composite ribs which run the length of the helmet. This composite skeleton is designed to spread any impact over a larger area, enabling larger vents to be used. Additionally, the Diamond also features a plastic shell running around the rim of the helmet lending it a really 'solid' feel. This extra shell is part of the reason why the Diamond weighs in at a relatively porky 310g (claimed) for the size large tested. The helmet is certified to the US CSPC standard which is more rigorous than its EU equivalent, and it's also possible to order a variant conforming to the Australian standard, which is even tougher still.

In use, the Diamond sits quite low on the head which prevents the mushroom-head look associated with a lot of helmets. The helmet extends down reassuringly low at the back and sides, providing good coverage for such a race oriented lid. The straps are easy to adjust to one's personal preference using a nifty locking cam system. The plastic cradle which raps around the back of the head is vertically adjustable with 7 possible positions giving a total range of around 30 degrees, and features a rather brilliant ratchet dial. Easily operable with one hand, the dial is big and rubberized, with a smooth action which feels absolutely brilliant in use. Additional padding on the rear of the cradle makes this the Rolls Royce of helmet retention systems; it was truly the most comfortable helmet I have ever worn.

Now for the bad news.

Whilst testing the helmet, I crashed twice at relatively low speeds, both times during a race. In both cases, the retention cradle disconnected from the helmet on one side, allowing the helmet slide around on my head - not ideal. Inspection post-race showed that the cradle is attached to the shell via a clip-in fitting which hadn't withstood the forces involved. A helmet's retention system is there to ensure that the helmet remains in the optimal position during a crash, so this failure is a serious compromise of safety. I haven't heard or read of others experiencing this problem, but it seems to me that the cradle attachment method should be a lot more secure than it is. Suffice to say that I quickly ditched the Diamond in favour of something that stayed on my head in a crash.

Given the nature of the fault we contacted Evans Cycles Louis Garneau's UK distributor, both they and Louis Garneau expressed their disappointment that the helmet failed to live up to our expectations in this vital aspect of performance. We then sent it back to Evans for initial examination and they sent it straight on to Louis Garneau in Canada so that their helmet engineer could examine it to find out whether we simply had a dodgy lid, or if there was a problem with that particular batch, or if there is some weakness in the design of the cradle itself. As soon as they have any information on this we'll update the review with it.

Verdict

Ultimately, no matter how good the Diamond felt whilst riding, the simple fact is that it failed to protect my head in a crash. I think Louis Garneau need to go back to the drawing board on this one, and redesign the cradle attachment method as it ruins an otherwise excellent helmet.

road.cc test report

Make and model: Louis Garneau Diamond helmet

Size tested: Large

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Louis Garneau say:

"The Diamond Helmet represents our greatest achievement in helmets. At 285 grams and over 40 vents, we have designed a helmet to out perform the competition. Through patented technology, we have unleashed an absurd amount of ventilation while still meeting safety standards. Worn by Chrissie Wellington in her record-setting 2009 Ironman World Championship title."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Weight: 10.1 oz/285 g

Certifications: CPSC-ASTM-CEN-AS 2063

Vents: 40

In-Mold Construction: Industrial process binding the microplastic and polystyrene together to add superior mechanical properties to these materials.

Evacuation channels: Internal channels provide better airflow and evacuate moisture and heat.

Super MSB Technology: Ring-shaped protection at the base of the helmet reinforces the perimeter for enhanced protection.

Exo-Insert Technology: Lightweight inner plastic reinforcement spreads the shock of impact and helps maintain the helmet's structure.

Composite Reinforcement: Lightweight composite skeleton provides structural support and integrity on impact.

Spiderlock Elite: Adjustable and detachable rack-and-pinion mechanism using only one hand to stabilize the helmet on the head. It is provided with ergonomic padding.

Steplock Divider: Cam locking device to quickly adjust strap position.

Sealed Airdry Padding: Washable sealed adjustment padding for enhanced durability, ergonomic design for optimum comfort.

S: 6 1/2-7; 20 1/2" - 22"; 52-56 cm

M: 7-7 3/8; 22" - 23 1/4"; 56-59 cm

L: 7 3/8-7 3/4; 23 1/4" - 24 1/2"; 59-62 cm

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
8/10

Construction quality was good. The issue with the retention system is more of a design fault than a manufacturing fault.

Rate the product for performance:
 
3/10

Doesn't stay on your head in a crash.

Rate the product for durability:
 
3/10

Retention system failed to withstand some minor crashes

Rate the product for weight, if applicable:
 
6/10

Not the lightest, but it feels lighter than it is in use, due to the excellent fit

Rate the product for comfort, if applicable:
 
9/10

The most comfortable helmet I've worn. No tight spots and the padding on the retention system is sublime.

Rate the product for value:
 
7/10

Is it twice as good as a helmet half the price? No, but this is the price of a top-of-the-range helmet these days.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes...until I crashed

Would you consider buying the product? No

Would you recommend the product to a friend? No

Overall rating: 3/10

About the tester

Age: 20  Height: 190cm  Weight: 70kg

I usually ride: Giant TCR Advanced 2  My best bike is: Canyon Ultimate CF7

I've been riding for: Under 5 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, sportives, mtb,

4 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Hi, what has been the follow up to this issue?

It's been a good few weeks since this review was published so surely they have identified the fault?

I was considering buying this helmet, but until I can get solid confirmation that this issue has been resolved or was just a one-off defect I don't want to risk it. What's the point of spending $$ on a helmet which doesn't properly perform it's primary task? Thinking

posted by elstado [17 posts]
10th October 2011 - 8:15

like this
Like (37)

We've been in contact with Louis Garneau about the helmet, and here's their take on the issue:

Quote:

Keep in mind that all our Spiderlock systems are meant as a stabilization/fit system and not a retention system. In fact for all types of worldwide safety certifications, CE, ASTM, or Australian standards, our helmets are tested without the Spiderlock since it is removable. This is how the norms are set. It has to be tested with only the fixed parts. Whilst this might sound crazy, there is common sense behind this practice and it works upon the basic principal that if it's removable, it cannot be part of the test as it's possible for the end user to remove the non-fixed parts and still wear the helmet.

On very rare occasions, depending of how you fall and the fit of the helmet (i.e if the helmet comes up too big and you need to wind-in a lot of adjustment on the fit system dial), it can force the Spiderlock to pop out from one side or sometimes both depending of the force of the impact. We see it more often with our speed skating helmets. If you fall on your back and hit your head at the back of the neck, since there is space between the back of the helmet and the skull, it is creating stress on the Spiderlock. Since this piece has no elasticity, it pops out. Under no circumstances will this affect the overall safety of the helmet – even with the Spiderlock disengaged on both sides a well adjusted helmet will remain securely in place on the head to protect and absorb any further impact.

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7319 posts]
28th November 2011 - 17:40

like this
Like (41)

Not convinced on that one....was thinking of the Quartz...but if that's the 'way' the spiderlock works...then I might just give it a miss..

The_Kaner
FREEEEEEEEDOM!

The _Kaner's picture

posted by The _Kaner [409 posts]
3rd March 2012 - 14:42

like this
Like (39)

Because everyone's head shape is little different, some helmets are designed to better fit those with more rounded or more elongated heads.

My head falls into the more "elongated" category. I've taken a few low speed spills and not had any problem with this helmet.

I notice the spiderlock only requires four clicks to have a really secure fit. Even with no clicks it feels quite secure on my head with the chin strap secured.

So I wonder if the problem is that the reviewer just has a head shape that is not optimal for this helmet and would be better served with another. It does sounds like he is quite experienced, and yet other possibilities include that he would have had a better fit with a one size smaller helmet, the 15 mm provided pads would have given a better fit, or the chin straps were not adjusted tightly enough.

I don't think the manufacturer is just "giving a line" about the spiderlock system being not necessary for protection.
I kept my original instuctions and it says "Spiderlock is your helmet stabilizing system and is not part of the retention system (strap). The stabilizing system gives you a quick and accurate adjustment of your head circumference for a better comfort."

So anyone trying this, or any other helmet with a system like Spiderlock, it is important they do not try to overcompensate for a loose fitting helmet by just tightening the dial. With too much "wiggle room" it is likely the helmet can still slide on your head in a crash, whether or not the fit tightening system lets go entirely or just loosens.

Helmet safety should come with a properly fitted helmet that would not turn just with the chin straps secured, not relying on the "fit system" to keep the head in place.

posted by charlieinneedhan [1 posts]
18th July 2012 - 21:15

like this
Like (46)

road.cc reviews

Latest reviews

6/10
£69.99
May 28, 2014
5/10
£39.99
May 28, 2014
7/10
£49.99
May 27, 2014
6/10
£80.00
May 27, 2014
9/10
£199.99
May 26, 2014
7/10
£949.00
May 25, 2014
8/10
£92.50
May 25, 2014
8/10
£80.00
May 24, 2014
7/10
£14.99
May 23, 2014
9/10
£44.99
May 23, 2014
9/10
£3499.95
May 21, 2014
7/10
£49.99
May 20, 2014
8/10
£34.00
May 20, 2014
8/10
£449.51
May 18, 2014
6/10
£8.99
May 17, 2014
7/10
£39.99
May 16, 2014
8/10
£39.99
May 16, 2014
7/10
£295.00
May 15, 2014
4/10
£29.99
May 15, 2014
5/10
£244.99
May 14, 2014
8/10
£150.00
May 14, 2014
9/10
£49.99
May 12, 2014
8/10
£70.00
May 12, 2014
8/10
£4449.00
May 11, 2014
7/10
£34.99
May 11, 2014
 
1