At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Well done that man! Coconut in the post....
I wish road.cc would bring their review up to date with regards to new bikes
intervals.icu is a good free alternative to TP
thats incredibly generous, my assumption is their thinking goes something like...
Absolutely fine - they're Shimano ICE tech rotors & pads which helps. It's fairly hilly where I live (Dorset) and I'm 87kg so they get tested...
I presume they also switch off when Linford Christie makes raises his head....
That top picture of the team really does hammer home the skills and trust involved in riding a TT bike on a banked circuit at 40+mph, centimetres...
In essence, that's the difference. I have been lunged at by numerous Collies and consider them the most dangerous breed I come across on the paths,...
Facts aside, which she has obviously chosen to ignore in the search of what she thinks is a polpulist vote, we need to aspire to a greater...
Like healthcare or formal education?