RSP Steradian LED front light  £29.99

7/10

Impressive budget light for sub/urban commuting and winter training

Weight 131g   Contact  www.cyclelife.com

by Shaun Audane   February 15, 2011  

The RSP Steradian gets its name from the Greek for ‘solid beam’. It uses a single-watt LED that seems a lot brighter thanks to clever collimator lens technology, which is traditionally used to guide lasers. You get a very crisp, solid beam that’s good enough in high power mode for shorter journeys in pitch darkness.

Raleigh say the Steradian pumps out an impressive 1200 candlepower, three times that of some other single watt lights. There are three lighting modes: high, low, and flashing. The highest setting provides a spotlight with pin-sharp focus, giving sufficient light to see properly on unlit, rural lanes at 16mph. An integrated cowling prevents the light from shining upwards and dazzling.

It’ll last 19 hours on high power, compared to 26 in low and 33 in flashing, and you can eke out the run time by switching between modes as necessary. Flashing is particularly effective for being seen by in twilight conditions and when tackling urban traffic systems with roundabouts and side roads. Last season’s RSP range suffered from poor peripheral visibility. This has been greatly improved for 2010/11; from the graph you can see that although it's not as bright in the centre as some competing lights, it has a good peripheral spread.

The weather sealing and build quality are as good as lights costing twice as much, and the Steradian’s dense plastic casing should take road vibration and casual commuter carelessness in its stride. The sensible positioning of the switch should prevent the light flicking on at the bottom of a bag. It’s easy to turn it on or off or toggle between modes while riding, however, and the switch has a positive feel when pressed.

Popping open the casing reveals the sealed lens and the battery tray for its four AAAs. This sealing is effective, giving the Steradian impressive weather resistance. Mine has shrugged off prolonged downpours. Even a five-minute onslaught from the garden hose couldn’t reveal any weaknesses. The tool-free bracket fits securely on most handlebar diameters, and stays firm even on rougher roads, bridleways and towpaths.

The Steradian could be all the light you need for commuting and suburban winter training, particular if you’re only making shorter journeys. The latest generation of rechargeable systems still have the edge in convenience and long-term economy.

Verdict

Impressive budget light for sub/urban commuting and winter training

road.cc test report

Make and model: RSP Steradian LED front light

Size tested: n/a

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

'RSP Steradian 1 watt front light. Integrated collimator lens technology for optimum efficiency and output.' Essentially it's a very competent commuter light.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Latest collimator technology provides superior optical efficiency, increasing lumen output.

output and better light distribution. This results in a 1 watt LED generating 1200

candle power output.

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
7/10

Better than some costing nearly twice the price.

Rate the product for performance:
 
8/10
Rate the product for durability:
 
7/10

Very well sealed from the elements.

Rate the product for weight, if applicable:
 
7/10
Rate the product for comfort, if applicable:
 
7/10
Rate the product for value:
 
8/10

Very good, given the level of performance.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

The Steradian is a remarkably capable lamp that offers excellent illumination in most contexts. Weather seals are better than I had any right to expect and should resist pretty much anything the elements dish out. Perfect for round town and the suburbs, there's sufficient to see by along the lanes in the highest setting but budget high power rechargeable NiCad/NiMh types have the edge for regular rural duties.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Excellent output, reasonable run times, sensible, solid build quality.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Nothing of note.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Possibly

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Generally, yes.

Overall rating: 7/10

About the tester

Age: 37  Height: 1m 81  Weight: 70 kilos

I usually ride: Rough Stuff Tourer Based around 4130 Univega mtb Frameset  My best bike is: 1955 Holdsworth Road Path and several others including cross & traditional road

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: cyclo cross, commuting, touring, fixed/singlespeed, mtb,

5 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Quote:
Raleigh say the Steradian pumps out an impressive 1200 candlepower, three times that of some other single watt lights.

Comparing candlepower is meaningless without knowing the angle the cone of the beam (ie: perfect for marketing cheaper lights). eg: A laser pointer might have a 500,000 candlepower beam, but since the beam is columnar and only 1 mm in diameter, it wouldn't be much use to light your way home.

All Raleigh are saying here is that the spot from their beam is one third the area of other one watt LED lights, thanks to its collimator lens. They don't have a better LED.

To compare lights you need lumens.

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1339 posts]
18th February 2011 - 17:48

like this
Like (2)

I've added the beam test graph to the review; sorry, should have been there from the start

Quote:
To compare lights you need lumens

Since that's a quantitative measure of the light's total output, it's also meaningless without knowing the beam pattern, for exactly the same reason. We measure lux at 2m over a 60° arc as we think that's more helpful and comparable.

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7324 posts]
18th February 2011 - 18:01

like this
Like (1)

dave_atkinson wrote:
I've added the beam test graph to the review; sorry, should have been there from the start

Quote:
To compare lights you need lumens

Since that's a quantitative measure of the light's total output, it's also meaningless without knowing the beam pattern, for exactly the same reason. We measure lux at 2m over a 60° arc as we think that's more helpful and comparable.

Yes, your measuring of the beam pattern is even better.

But without knowing the pattern of the beam, knowing the total output of the light (lumens) is more useful than knowing candlepower. A light with twice the total light output will be better than another light at illuminating your environment, if you assume that the beam pattern is the same. ie: The consumer knows that any differences between two lights with the same rating in lumens will be down to the design of the reflector and lens. (Assuming that the lumens ratings are accurate.)

Your graph is a great way to compare lights. But I think your X-axis, which goes from 1 to 21, is wrong. Shouldn't it go from -30º trough zero to +30º?

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1339 posts]
18th February 2011 - 19:19

like this
Like (1)

yeah, it should. excel not my strong point, back to the PHP Smile

Dave Atkinson's picture

posted by Dave Atkinson [7324 posts]
18th February 2011 - 20:22

like this
Like (1)

Excel is a bit crap for graphs.

You could convert your Y-axis to candela (then you wouldn't need to specify the measuring distance). At 1 metre distance 1 lux = 1 candela. At 2 metres 1 lux is 4 candela, so all you need to do is multiply the values by 4.

The peak intensity of the RSP Steradian light looks like it is about 145 lux at 2 m, which is 580 candela. Since one candlepower is roughly one (actually 0.981) candela, it is hard to see how Raleigh claim 1200 candlepower.

two wheels good; four wheels bad

posted by cat1commuter [1339 posts]
18th February 2011 - 21:19

like this
Like (2)

road.cc reviews

Latest reviews

9/10
£115.00
August 29, 2014
8/10
£50.00
August 29, 2014
7/10
£41.00
August 28, 2014
9/10
£44.99
August 28, 2014
6/10
£49.99
August 27, 2014
8/10
£1250.00
August 27, 2014
5/10
£54.99
August 26, 2014
7/10
£29.99
August 26, 2014
9/10
£155.00
August 25, 2014
8/10
£34.99
August 24, 2014
8/10
£2299.00
August 24, 2014
3/10
£124.99
August 23, 2014
8/10
£149.99
August 23, 2014
8/10
£20.99
August 22, 2014
8/10
£31.99
August 22, 2014
8/10
£100.00
August 21, 2014
9/10
£24.99
August 21, 2014
8/10
£14.99
August 20, 2014
9/10
£2999.00
August 20, 2014
6/10
£21.99
August 19, 2014
8/10
£329.99
August 18, 2014
7/10
£44.99
August 18, 2014
6/10
£7.99
August 17, 2014
8/10
£2899.00
August 17, 2014
9/10
£15.99
August 16, 2014
8/10
£117.00
August 16, 2014
7/10
£35.00
August 15, 2014
2/10
£9.99
August 15, 2014
8/10
£49.99
August 14, 2014
8/10
£180.00
August 13, 2014
8/10
£599.99
August 12, 2014
7/10
£12.99
August 11, 2014
 
1