At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I don't think that's true, there will always be a need for separated cycle infra. Many people, myself included and also many who do not yet cycle,...
Nice. We've got a staffie cross (his father was a Jack Russell who may have been punching above his weight). He looks like a larger, more buffed,...
Yes, so who's marshalling the old data?
VRT have an interview with Tiesj Benoot. He says the plan was to attack on the Kanarieberg. He was leading Wout, and Wout said "Go!". Tiesj stood...
He's not the sharpest tool in the box, is he?
"can’t thank @LancsPolice enough for their assistance."
It really is entirely accurate. None of these Gammonflakes can even define what "woke" means. It appears to be everything from not wanting racism...
Here's my 2011 Fuji track bike. Had it repainted and use it for all my commutes in San Francisco.
Buy a Honda CBR600RR for roughly the same amount of money*....