At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Dr Dan ? nothing, Main Road in Kesgrave is just as bad as anything Woodbridge chucks at you to cycle on, imo its actually worse, but people always...
If you cycled regularly you would know that it isn't a small number of drivers that are bad, its just a small number that get caught.
Design and concept is great, build quality and customer service are not quite up to the same level. Unfortunately for an expensive item they don't...
How long until she claims her account was hacked?
Anyone got a map / view of what's actually being proposed (or indeed opposed)? The formal planning application seems to be here but ICBA to wade...
While Polis Scotland can come across as being inept and clueless regarding road crime I think they're stuck between a rock and a hard place due to...
Great win from Welshman Stephen Williams!
I haven't seen the report to which you refer but looking at the graph that you shared there it appears only to have looked at speed versus the...
Another utterly pathetic sentence...
Ah, well, without prejudice to my above defence, I would say that on the balance of probabilities the mudguards are SKS Longboards, fitted at a...