Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Horse riders ask New Forest Show to stop renting car parking to sportives

Car parking plea to end to mass cycling events in the New Forest

Horse riders in the New Forest have pleaded with the organisers of the New Forest Show to stop renting out their showground as car parking for cyclo-sportive riders.

Equestrians in the area feel that there are too many organised mass cycle rides in the area, which often start and finish at the showground in New Park, Brokenhurst.

The New Forest Agricultural Show Society has said that it will consider the request at a board meeting in November, citing the cancellation of a pony drive last month due to the presence of the Wiggle New Forest 100 Sportive, organised by UK Cycle Events.

We reported how the event, which saw up to 3,000 cyclists descend on the area, meant that the New Forest Verderers made the decision to cancel the drift on safety grounds.

According to the Forestry Commission: "round-ups, or ‘drifts’ are held throughout the forest by the Agisters to treat any health problems the ponies and cattle may have, and to keep a count of the stock roaming the Open Forest.

Mares and foals are marked during this time – foals are branded and the tails of mares are cut in distinctive patterns – enabling the Agisters to see that the grazing fees have been paid and to indicate in which area their owner lives."

New Forest Equestrian Association chairman Tony Hockley told the Bournemouth Echo that the cancellation was the “last straw”.

He said: “The purpose of the society, which leases the showground from the Forestry Commission, is to ‘support agriculture and equestrianism’.

"The use of the showground as a car park for commercial off-site events involving more than 1,000 cars and thousands of competitors is making life even harder for a struggling equine community that is the backbone of the rural economy 365 days a year.

“Without the availability of the showground site, these cycle events would be restricted to a much more manageable size.”

New Forest Show secretary Denis Dooley said: “We obtained the lease of New Park in 2005 and since this time have offered a low-cost, flexible venue to a variety of different organisations.

“We have recently received a letter from the NFEA expressing their concerns over the identity and size of future events held at New Park and will look into these concerns at our next board meeting on November 20.”

Martin Barden of UK Cycling Events said that in the case of the Wiggle New Forest 100 sportive, due notice had been given of the event, which was planned last year.

He said: “Despite offers of altering our event and working with the drift to ensure it was safe and could continue, the Verderers have made the decision to move it to another day.”
“We hope that with better communication from the Verderers, future clashes can be avoided.”

The row is the latest in a series of clashes between cyclists and New Forest residents.

The Wiggle New Forest Spring Sportive was subject to sabotage, with in excess of 1,000 signs vandalised, drawing pins scattered on the road and motorists driving slowly to form a kind of rolling road block. The event has been the subject of vociferous opposition from some locals.

It’s all part of an ongoing battle between horse riders and cyclists in the New Forest, which has seen accusations of spooked horses and blocked roads for locals.

In June Last month we reported how a woman whose horse had to be put down after it was frightened by a group of sportive riders in Sussex said that cyclists had no respect for other vulnerable road users.

Jo Flew and her daughter Joanna were out for a horseback ride on June 23 when they happened upon the route of the Etape de Sussex along Daleham Lane.

When they came across about 20 cyclists, Jo's horse kicked Joanna's in fear and broke its leg.

In Hampshire in May, we reported how local police were forced to issue a strongly worded warning ahead of a re-run of the Wiggle Spring Sportive, that they would not tolerate any attempts to disrupt the event, which on its first day was marred by bad weather and attempts by some local people to disrupt it.

Tips for riding around horses:

  • Horses are often spooked by cyclists, especially when approached from behind.
  • It's advisable to slow right down, and even be prepared to stop. 
  • Call out if you think you might not have been noticed, and pass with plenty of room to spare.

Add new comment

51 comments

Avatar
wyadvd | 10 years ago
0 likes

I've ridden some great sportives in the new forest and the Isle of Wight starting and finishing in brokenhurst. What both cyclists and equestrians should remember is that we both share the same precedent to our right to use the road ( free of VED): we are both the original users of the roads. The roads were built originally for our mutual use.

Avatar
Ush | 10 years ago
0 likes

Any cycling event that people drive to in great numbers is something to be discouraged.

Avatar
BigBear63 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Isn't it the case that we have to share the world we live in and get some pleasure out life while we are around?

Whether you ride a horse or a bike, in an organised event or not, can't we do so in a more harmonious manner?

I would fully understand the NF Horseriding community's views if the NF authorities were scheduling a Sportive event on the majority of Saturdays or Sundays of the year or even once a month might wind me up, but for gods sake no single group have the right to expect preferential treatment over any other, surely?

I fully understand how upsetting it must be for a horse owner to see their horse injured because of inconsiderate 'sportivers' and if anything I would suggest that the organisors of the events, such as Wiggle, have a responsibility for ensuring their participants are made aware of expected standards of courtesy and behaviour, towards other users of the Forest. Better notification of the events for other NF users, reducing numbers of riders on each event and penalising bad behaviour might help. All in all its organisation that matters and if it is done poorly and without the consideration of others clashes will always happen.

Avatar
J90 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Toff cunts.

Avatar
Neil753 | 10 years ago
0 likes

It's clear from many of these comments that even cyclists are becoming uneasy about the effect sportives have on the whole cycling "cause".

Interested groups - cyclists, residents, local businesses and local agencies, need to sit down and create a sportive "roadmap" for the future.

Avatar
Guyz2010 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I wonder if I was the land owner of the show ground and 3000 folk offered to pay me to park on their land what I would say, "No go away I make far too much out of the horsey brigade who use this half a dozen times a year" or rather "money money money".
Agreed the sportives should have a restricted numbers say 1000 at a time.....then three times as many events.

Avatar
farrell | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'm feeling a bit Les Dawson this afternoon so lets have a little game:

"What is the only animal to have a *blank* on it's back?"

Unfortunately I can offer neither a chequebook nor a pen for this Blankety Blank.

Avatar
gareth2510 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I used to ride in the New Forest every week, but have since stopped due to the abuse given from car drivers and funnily enough some of the horse riders.

Local residents and horse riders using the Wiggle sportives as their main gripe is just tosh in my opinion. Without fail, every ride I would get some abuse thrown at me from cars and horse riders alike, regardless if I was riding solo or in a group single file. Cyclists are just hated in the New Forest. Period.

Tea shops in Beaulieu, Lepe, Lyndhurst, Brockenhurst and all the other New Forest locations favoured by us enjoy a massive trade from cyclists, but this goes unheard. You never hear a cafe owner moaning about cyclists!

As has been screamed at me by both driver and horse rider a plenty as I ride quietly through the forest "these are our roads"
We should therefore neither be seen nor heard. It seems we should not be there at all.
How can one communicate, argue the point or negotiate with a mindset like this?

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 10 years ago
0 likes

MDC 06 - While I understand your approach, and appreciate your appreciation of cycling, but I have to agree with La Domestique, 700cc and Mercury One.

Sportives represent an undue pressure on local infrastructure for a sustained period unlike any of the other events you mention.

I don't think people are saying that sportives don't have a place in the pantheon of cycling experiences. I've done enough of them. But I also recognise the issues they throw up, and that some areas seem to be over sub-scribed with events/riders. I recognise the need for the companies to try to make a profit, but the only thing limiting numbers is probably how many people they can get into their car park, rather than anything else. There doesn't seem to be too much preventing companies organising events in the same areas.

What I see now in and around the South-East is sportives criss-crossing the area. I've almost pulled into the wrong feed station due to this. I've also waited at the bottom of Box-Hill for a mechanic to pass and seen 3 different sportives pass by in different directions. If you are just trying to do your basic grocery run or trying to get some place and it happens to be on the route of a sportive or two it must be hellish. Especially if it is repeated weekend on weekend like they do in Surrey - I did the Ride London 100 and the London Revolution - the routes were identical in places, except in reverse, about a month apart. Not too long after there was the Prudential Ride - with roads closed.

I'm surprised sometimes that there are not more incidents at the top of hills with the way people stop on narrow/single track ascents. The point people are making is not to ban these events, but just have a bit more sensitivity to local populations - that is all that they seem to be asking for.

The smaller rides for 50 riders or so seem like a perfect sort of event, and if it benefits a charity, or a local cycle club that sounds excellent.

Avatar
Tony Farrelly | 10 years ago
0 likes

Or play them at their own game, 3000 horses… imagine having to pick up after that lot

Avatar
Guyz2010 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Lets get 3000 cars together to drive round the New Forest and park up somewhere....No-one will ever notice!

Avatar
nostromo | 10 years ago
0 likes

One of the things that annoy me in the reporting of issues like these is the lack of data. Like, how many organised rides are taking place per year in places like the New Forest and Surrey?

We need to understand the scale of the situation. At the moment we seem to be focusing on the major events like Wiggle New Forest and Ride London, whereas there are other rides out there. A quick search on Google for sportives in the NF shows a fair few events being organised and I suspect that is just the tip of the iceberg.

If there really were large organised bike rides occuring there every weekend in the season, It's not hard to imagine people getting pissed off with it.

Anyone can organise a Sportive - I know this for a fact because I organise one myself. Well, it's more of a charity ride in the Chilterns for about 50 riders. But I have no qualifications, licences or permission to do such a thing, just the organisational skills I've built up over the years.

I've thought about scaling things up and organising a sportive-style ride just on the basis of what logistics would be involved and how much money I could make.

If I can do it, anyone can. And that seems to be the problem here. There are no restrictions and no centralised process, which makes it a free for all.

Yes, the roads are for everyone and no laws are being broken, but if you are going to channel thousands of bike riders into the most densely populated national park in the UK (New Forest) every weekend of the year then it will eventually annoy the hell out of the people that live there.

And stop with the 'economic benefits' of tourism too. That's something else that needs quantifying. Too many people on these threads spout off about how much money cyclists bring into an area without actually realising that most of the cash is going into the hands of the people organising the rides.

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 10 years ago
0 likes

Like MDC 06 I was a road runner and the current popularity of sportives reminds me of the running boom of 30 years ago. Every town and city had its 10k, half or full marathon.

That was a craze and it soon faded away, as will sportives.

Avatar
farrell replied to Kapelmuur | 10 years ago
0 likes
Crosshouses wrote:

Like MDC 06 I was a road runner

I think New Forresters probably pose a slightly different set of problems than Wile E. Coyote though.

Avatar
WolfieSmith | 10 years ago
0 likes

Sportives are great for the cyclists and great for making money, however, they're getting too big and are not the best way of promoting cycling with everyone else. A restriction on numbers is needed and better publicity so horse riders and cyclists can look out for each other and preferably avoid each other.

Avatar
700c | 10 years ago
0 likes

The points made by gazza_d and MDC 06 are correct,.in that nobody opposes other events quite as these horsey people are opposing the new forest ride / people in Surrey are complaining about road closures / Box Hill over crowding.

However... The point about a 3000 strong cycling event, is that not only does it cause traffic for the the 1000 cars driving to the show ground, but the event itself involves slow moving traffic for the 6 hours or whatever that it takes the peletons to complete the circuit.

So not really a valid comparison!

I also think that because I'm not local to these areas, and am fortunate to ride where cyclists are tolerated, without this perception of groups competing for limited space on the roads, it's not fair for me to simply brand locals as NIMBY's in order to rubbish their argument.

Avatar
gazza_d | 10 years ago
0 likes

This kind of anti-cycling backlash really disappoints.

Do the horse rider groups campaign against

Car boot sales
Caravan rallies
Gymkanas
Pony Clubs
Antique fairs
Wedding fairs
Firework displays (with Bonfire night almost on us)

I could go on, but there are an awful lot of other events besides cycling going on in the New Forest and you never see the natives rail against them.

Ignore them and carry on as normal. As long as the Police and other authorities are happy then the nimbies can bog off

Avatar
MDC 06 | 10 years ago
0 likes

There is someone on this site who has the signature tagline "if bicycles were invented now - they'd be the solution not the problem" and I just think it sums the situation up so well.

I find it depressing that there is so much anti-cycling sentiment / resentment in the UK generally and also how willing cyclists are to criticise each other's choices as to how they enjoy the sport.

I started cycling for a bit of fitness but really started to put miles in of the road when I signed up for L'Etape du Tour' - one of those dreaded events so regularly criticised on these forums for 'paying to ride free roads'. As part of my milestone targets for my training and my education of pacing, riding in groups, eating, drinking I entered a sportive each month building up to the Etape. I started with the Cheshire Cat and developed my training with The Charlie B, Granfondo Cogolin, The Tour de Lac Lemond and Grandfondo Ventoux. For me, entering these events was an incentive, an education and an enjoyment (for the most part) - so why the negativity about them?? They work for some - not all.

A few years ago I was running regularly and entered a number of big city marathons. Not once did a club runner criticise why I would want to pay to run on the free roads. It was always encouragement and "great - someone else enjoying the sport", getting out there and living life. I was never going to trouble the scorer but I still got out there and challenged myself in a way that appealed to me even if not you.

As for all the comments about riding more than two abreast and slightly holding up traffic (The Forest is a bit short of climbs to break up the groups) - You can be sure that nobody worries about the disruption to local traffic as 60,000 come and go each week to football matches , just as when F1 goes to silverstone, the horse racing at Ascot, Classical concerts in Hyde Park or even the New Forest Show gridlocking part of the New Forest each summer for 1 to 2 weeks..... We all have different ways to enjoy life - we just need some give and take. Even if there were 5 large sportives a year in the Forest (and I think there are less) this is still a fraction of the time that the Forest is available for all other users to share and enjoy - and the benefits to the local economy is great (I suspect that a great number of the complainers are retired and 'financially secure' - not the local B&B's).

It bemuses me that it generates so much hostility - not that appreciation and respect to the community and the environment is not equally required from cyclists whilst being "accommodated" ...

-------

Just a sub note as have rambled too much already but you can be sure these conversations are not happening in France where even a local club sportive has assistance from the police, traffic stopped at junctions rolling road closures and large peletons etc etc etc.

Avatar
Leodis | 10 years ago
0 likes

The racketeering going on is not in the interest of cycling, the people making the money are not doing the image of cycling any good with repeated sportives in one area.

Avatar
700c | 10 years ago
0 likes

@Neil753, great post.

Avatar
ashfanman | 10 years ago
0 likes

Neil753 - not sure how workable that would be in practice, but a lot of that makes a lot of sense. Pouring the profit directly back into the local economy, such as carrying out repairs on the road, is a particularly good idea.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 10 years ago
0 likes

Again, people here are too quick to diminish the views of non-cyclists, or perceived anti-cyclists.

So the equine community has seen itself disrupted by the cycling events. I can understand that they ask about the scheduling of the cycling events. It doesn't sound like they are asking for a ban. Just a but more consideration.

I can imagine that an event which takes up 100 miles of round, has multiple routes and lasts 10hrs would also cause a fair bit of local disruption.

My experience of sportives is that there are belligerent elements who treat the experience with all the due care and consideration of someone who has paid their £30 entrance and expects to cue jump every ride i.e. None. So I can see why groups of locals are gathering themselves together to register their objections.

Why can't people just try to get along and pay due respect? I think that is all that is being asked for really.

Avatar
Neil753 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Pssst! Want to make sportives the "acceptable face of cycling", and put a smile on the face of even the most ardent sportive saboteur? It's radical, but it could be a winner...

We need "non profit" organisations (such as local authorities with the support local cycling groups) to run sportives on closed roads, rather than private organisations for commercial gain.

We need to ensure that non-interested parties (such as residents) are inconvenienced no more than once a year.

No complicated legislation would be required because, when faced with a choice of mixing it with the traffic or riding on closed roads, riders would probably be keen to ride local authority events and other events run by commercial concerns would wither on the vine.

And here's the radical bit. Plough all revenue from each sportive into filling potholes along that particular sportive route, something which everyone using that route, or living on that route, will appreciate. It doesn't have to be pothole filling, but it's one hell of an effective benefit for the very people that tend to resent our sportives.

The only losers will be a few entrepreneurs, but let's face it, running an event that causes local inconvenience, for profit, and for that profit to be taken out of the community, and frequently enough for people to get seriously upset about it, is just plain wrong. OK, some cafes and B&Bs might benefit, but that's not the same as the whole "community".

Would sportives become bigger, more exciting and, crucially, more accepted by the communities through which they pass? Absolutely! You'd probably get residents petitioning to have a sportive run through their neighbourhood, so they can have some potholes fixed, and you might find the sort of "once a year" resident participation that you see by the side of the road during the Paris-Brest-Paris. In fact, how would you like to have people cheering as you're tanking along, rather than spreading tacks on the road and pulling down direction signs? The potential to boost both the popularity and acceptance of cycling, rather than being dragged into the arena of conflict, both physically and politically, is enormous!

Ok, perhaps I'm getting a bit carried away here, but you get the point. Most people can tolerate disruption once a year, and particularly if the community becomes the signicant beneficiary financially.

Let's me state what many cyclists are already thinking - sportives are starting to have a seriously adverse effect on the communities through which they pass, our efforts to persuade people that cycling is a good thing are being compromised, more and more groups are starting to really hate us, and things are starting to get out of control, to the detriment of all cyclists, not just the ones who ride these events.

The concept of ploughing back profits from sportives into those communities through which these rides are routed, and limiting the inconvenience to just once a year, needs to be considered as a possible solution to this whole attritional situation.

Avatar
Metjas | 10 years ago
0 likes

why does our gut feeling seem to be "what are we cyclists doing wrong" where in fact the very large majority of us are incredibly good at almost making us 'invisible' on public roads so as not to antagonize other users. Cyclists in general are very good at accommodating others - one could only hope others would do likewise.

It is totally unwarranted for a very small minority of horse riders to claim their enjoyment/safety is being jeopardized by cycling events. These people should be made to do a house swap with continentals to realize how normal it is for a cycling event, race or sportive, to be both supported and tolerated by the wider community.

Avatar
matttheaudit replied to Metjas | 10 years ago
0 likes

Yes most of us do as we should and so make no impact on the memory of the people who like complaining. Sadly, the one or two cyclists who behave like pricks are the ones non-cyclists remember and we will all end up in the same negative category. Just check out the comments of your local paper whenever there is a cycling related story - all cyclists become the pavement rider, the red light jumper or hoody wearing handbag snatcher.

Avatar
NIrish | 10 years ago
0 likes

I can't say that I would agree with those who put horse riders and cyclists in the same position. As road users we wish for respect and will try to accommodate traffic behind us, horsey people are not accommodating in the slightest. Par example driving around a bend at 50 and slowing and alerted by oncoming drivers to discover two horse riders on the road. If these were cyclists any hold up would be minimal, we don't get spooked by passing traffic. What's wrong with fields for horses.

Avatar
JonD replied to NIrish | 10 years ago
0 likes
NIrish wrote:

I can't say that I would agree with those who put horse riders and cyclists in the same position. As road users we wish for respect and will try to accommodate traffic behind us, horsey people are not accommodating in the slightest. Par example driving around a bend at 50 and slowing and alerted by oncoming drivers to discover two horse riders on the road. If these were cyclists any hold up would be minimal, we don't get spooked by passing traffic. What's wrong with fields for horses.

First - they have just as much right to be there as anyone else.

Plus if you think barrelling around corners at 50 and relying on others to alert you to what's there is ok, may I suggest you read 'Roadcraft', as used by the Police and IAM, eg 'only go as fast as the distance you can see to stop in'. There is no excuse to being caught out by what's around the corner.

Avatar
NIrish replied to JonD | 10 years ago
0 likes

It's a bend and not a corner, it does have matrix boards for horses that we're not lit at the time. As much as I enjoy a bit rallying I am no longer a male under 25 driver, I was abiding by the rules of the road he cling why I said slowing.

Avatar
JonD replied to NIrish | 10 years ago
0 likes

(Rats -double post)

Avatar
russyparkin | 10 years ago
0 likes

hum going against the grain here but i think there are to many sportives period. what happened to just going for a ride around a route?

when did it become the norm to pay £40 to ride the roads that every other day of the year are free?

i live on dartmoor and did the classic route in reverse this year cost me nothing and i didnt have to worry about the phycotic riders who dont know the decents and cattle grids stacking it left right and centre and generally cycling with no regard for the people around them?

Pages

Latest Comments