Home
Obstacle Avoidance system demonstrated

Car maker Ford is working on a system that takes control of the car if it detects an obstacle in the road ahead, and either brakes or steers the car around it.

The Obstacle Avoidance system will first warn the driver of an impending collision, and then take over if they don’t react.

The system uses radar, ultrasonic sensors and a camera to scan the road up to 200m ahead. A display in the car warns the driver and if necessary puts on the brakes, looks for space on the road ahead and steers around the obstacle.

Here's Ford's video demonstrating how it works.

"You're driving down the road and a pedestrian or something comes out from either side of your vehicle from your peripheral vision where you don't have a good look at it," said Bard Samardzich, vice-president of product development at Ford's European division.

"Obstacle Avoidance can sense that the pedestrian or that object is coming across the front of your vehicle. If it doesn't sense you responding accordingly in your vehicle by braking or manoeuvring, it will take over."

The system is being developed in association with other car makers, including BMW, Fiat, Daimler, Volvo and Volkswagen which means we could begin to see these devices much more widely available. Currently similar systems are available from higher-end manufacturers like Volvo and Mercedes.

Ford already has system that mitigates lower-speed collisions, Active City Stop, but that is limited to detecting static obstacles or an object moving at less than 30km/h relative to the car. Ford says its new system is being tested at speeds over 60km/h.

Some drivers may resist the idea of car taking over but Tim Urquhart, of consultants IHS Automotive told the BBC, “there will be less resistance to a piece of technology like this than there will be to the concept of totally driverless cars.

“Anything that can avoid a potentially dangerous situation that can cause injury or death sounds like a good piece of equipment.”

Ford is also developing a car that will park itself, and while it hasn’t explicitly said there’s overlap between the two systems, it seems likely that some of the same sensors will be used. That should help with acceptance.

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

10 comments

Avatar
sfichele [140 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

This sounds like a great idea - now people can safely eat their cornflakes on the go, put on their make up, or just brush their teeth without fear of those nasty police slapping them on the wrist for driving without due-care.

Avatar
kaska [12 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Any driver that needs this shouldn't be driving.

Avatar
banzicyclist2 [299 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

What if you're in multi-lane traffic and at the side of a car when "it" decides to take over and swerve around an obsticle  7

Who do you hold accountable, the driver or the vehicle manufacturer, always assuming you survive the encounter  39

Another good idea on paper, look after the "sardines" in their tin boxes, bugger everyone else  41

Avatar
qwerky [184 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Presumably, if its clever enough to detect its going to hit something then its clever enough to ensure that the resulting evasive manouver won't also be dangerous. Can't believe the designers wouldn't have though of this; eg swerving to avoid a pedestrian only to move into oncoming traffic, or hit a lamp post.

Avatar
shay cycles [318 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
kaska wrote:

Any driver that needs this shouldn't be driving.

Yes, but if no driver needed it then surely there would be no collisions - and there seem to be plenty of those.

The options to make the roads much safer seem to be:

A) reduce the amount of motor vehicle significantly
B) restrictions such as lower speeds
C) driver testing at regular intervals
D) proper enforcement
E) technology

In general I'm suspicious of such technology but it is actually nice to see stuff being developed to protect those outside the car as much as inside it.

Avatar
notfastenough [3665 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Ultimately these half-way houses are never going to properly solve the problem, OR just create others, such as the liability questions outlined in the comments above. Just go the whole hog to driverless cars and get on with it.

Avatar
John Stevenson [249 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
notfastenough wrote:

Just go the whole hog to driverless cars and get on with it.

That's going to take a while though. This is a step in the right direction, surely.

Saying it won't 'properly solve the problem' is like expecting a single cure for cancer. There are loads of different types of cancer with different causes, and different treatments. Same for road safety. There are lots of crash types, with lots of different causes, so the more ways of reducing and mitigating them the better.

Avatar
sfichele [140 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

The picture of the car steering around the rock: I do like how the really 'smart' avoidance system is depicted to be steering the car straight round the large rock without slowing down, around a blind bend, on the opposite side of the road....

Avatar
crazy-legs [720 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

The options to make the roads much safer seem to be:...

I've always thought that the best way to improve driving standards would be to replace the airbag with a big metal spike.

I bet everyone would drive VERY carefully then!

Avatar
fatbeggaronabike [800 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

"Obstacle Avoidance can sense that the pedestrian or that a object is coming across the front of your vehicle. If it doesn't sense you responding accordingly in your vehicle by braking or manoeuvring, it will take over." and blow poisonous gas into the vehicle.  24