Home
Deputy mayor concedes "we got this wrong"...

Bristol City Council has replaced a bike lane that’s part of the National Cycle Network with five car parking spaces that are expected to earn the council £20,000 per year in charges. And then changed its mind - see the update at the foot of this story.

Blogger ‘wheelsonthebike’ reports that at a recent meeting of the Bristol Cycle Forum, Terry Bullock, Bristol City Council’s traffic manager said that a section of lane on Colston Street had been replaced with the five parking spaces in August.

Mr Bullock was speaking as part of a discussion of Bristol Cycling Campaigns ‘Stop Pinching Bikes’ campaign which is attempting to get the council to implement proper quality assurance on road schemes so they do not create pinch points that endanger cyclists.

The new parking spaces on Colston Street are opposite a bus stop and the combination of parked cars and a stopped bus creates a pinch point that forces cyclists riding uphill out into the traffic.

Mr Bullock said that mistakes had been made before the quality assurance process had been fully implemented but said that things were improving.

Wheelsonthebike claims that the council’s actions are not matching its words.

Responding to Bristol Cycling Campaign's concern about pinch points in the city, Alistair Cox, Bristol’s city transport service manager wrote to Martin McDonnell of the campaign in July to say:

“It is of course not council policy to narrow a road to the extent that it disadvantages cycling, neither to expect cycling to share roads with heavy and fast traffic nor to build facilities that are obstructed by parked vehicles. It is completely understood that such conditions are a serious barrier to cycling by all except the few swift and brave enough to ‘take the lane’. These features can never form part of a comprehensive network suitable for all 8-80 years and it is our intention to build such a network.”

Update: Bristol backtracks

In response to a reader drawing this story to his attention, Bristol deputy mayor Mark Bradshaw this afternoon tweeted "we got this wrong re Colston St & I've asked for the pay & display bays to be removed."

Our official grumpy Northerner, John has been riding bikes for over 30 years since discovering as an uncoordinated teen that a sport could be fun if it didn't require you to catch a ball or get in the way of a hulking prop forward.

Road touring was followed by mountain biking and a career racing in the mud that was as brief as it was unsuccessful.

Somewhere along the line came the discovery that he could string a few words together, followed by the even more remarkable discovery that people were mug enough to pay for this rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work. He's pretty certain he's worked for even more bike publications than Mat Brett.

The inevitable 30-something MAMIL transition saw him shift to skinny tyres and these days he lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

19 comments

Avatar
therevokid [932 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

well now there's a surprise .... cycle lane or parking cash ...  39

Avatar
Goldfever4 [218 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Facepalm

Avatar
Matt eaton [742 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Very disapointing reading.

Avatar
Faroon [22 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Avatar
Kim [223 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

All too often cycling is seen as sport or leisure, but not as serious Transport, this is the fundamental problem. Cars are seen as transport, even though they are the most inefficient form of urban transport ever invented. Until we start to seriously promote the bicycle as transport, which can be used by everyone, this sort of thing will continue...

Avatar
a.jumper [846 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Bristol Cycling Campaign is probably up there with Cambridge and Oxford for promoting cycling as transport. Sustrans started there, even if some of their recent officer outbursts seem more Suspicious of Transport cycling (=safely but at a reasonable speed) than Sustainable Transport! There's a bike-friendly mayor. Now if only the Councils that Used to Be Avon (CUBA) could get kicked into line and stop doing stupid contradictory things like this!

Avatar
Guyz2010 [304 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Easy, just cycle in the road and cause congestion. The more cyclist, the slower the traffic gets...better all round as driving folk will realise and get on their rusty Halford Apollo's and do the same.

Avatar
Bristolbybike [13 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

My gast was well and truly flabbered when the man from the Council admitted this. His defence of the decision was dogged - apparently the income from the spaces is very useful and it could even be used to improve cycling elsewhere in the city  102 .

The lane was on a really popular route for cyclists and is in fact part of Sustrans route 4.

Avatar
farrell [1950 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Does anybody take Sustrans seriously anymore?

Can anybody take Sustrans seriously anymore?

Avatar
chokofingrz [404 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Actually I don't think it will cause too many problems on this part of Colston Street. The road is wide enough there and I have never needed to ride up it on the far left. As a cyclist you normally get a clear run up the middle of it with no cars ahead of or behind you.

Avatar
Matt eaton [742 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
chokofingrz wrote:

Actually I don't think it will cause too many problems on this part of Colston Street. The road is wide enough there and I have never needed to ride up it on the far left. As a cyclist you normally get a clear run up the middle of it with no cars ahead of or behind you.

It's really more of a political issue than a practical one. Replacing cycle infrastructure with car parking sends a certain message about the political priorities of the local authority. In reality, most people reading this will be confident road cyclists (ie confident on the roads, not necesarily roadies) and riding on the road, taking the lane etc. is not much of a problem and these changes won't affect them much.

It's all about perception and this sort of cycle infrastructure serves to make many people feel safer. I always say it but think about the school run mum with the bike trailer and 5 year old riding along side and consider if the infrastructure is suitable for them.

Avatar
Mr Agreeable [171 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
Ad Hynkel [105 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

 41

Avatar
andybwhite [248 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I was under the impression that NCN routes had some legal status and could not just be deleted willy nilly. Rather they must be rerouted. Has this happened in this case?

Avatar
a.jumper [846 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Presumably the NCN Route 4 continued and it's just the cycle lane that has been erased. NCN Routes go through all sorts of madness, as I'm sure Warrington Cycle Campaign has highlighted in their long-running Facility of the Month series. This (temporary?) loss just below Sustrans's HQ is particularly bad, though.

Avatar
northstar [1108 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
farrell wrote:

Does anybody take Sustrans seriously anymore?

Can anybody take Sustrans seriously anymore?

I never have, the NCN around Surrey is a joke.

Avatar
Bristolbybike [13 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
chokofingrz wrote:

Actually I don't think it will cause too many problems on this part of Colston Street. The road is wide enough there and I have never needed to ride up it on the far left. As a cyclist you normally get a clear run up the middle of it with no cars ahead of or behind you.

The addition of parking spaces means that one now has to move out into the flow of traffic to get around the cars leaving car-door space as you go. Not always an easy manoeuvre especially on what is not a quiet road (at least it isn't when I've used it) and local authorities should be aiming to make life easier for cyclists not harder.

Avatar
egb [43 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I'm with you on this. I don't see what the fuss is about. Colston Street has never been a problem to cycle up or down regardless of these spaces.

Whiteladies Road on the other hand is a right mess now.

Avatar
Big Les Wade [5 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Regardless of your view on Sustrans, what does it say about this country that for years the need for and, often, implementation of a cycle network has been lead by a charity? Not the government who you'd think would have an interest in reducing congestion, environmental impact and a growing health problem for the NHS to deal with.

Every Sustrans person I've ever dealt with actually rides a bike. For all purposes, in all conditions. Unlike the local authority engineers who design highway schemes, local councillors who make the decisions and the embarrassing embodiment of modern life that is MP Eric Pickles.

At least Bristol have the ability to compare existing cycle facilities with parking. Most of us don't yet have that luxury.

Well done all those in Bristol for putting this right and, yes, that includes any councillor for admitting they were wrong as that is a rare quality in politics.