Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Drivers to be fined and given penalty points for range of careless driving offences starting from today

New regime partly aimed at ensuring drivers breaking law don't go unpunished - but IAM says education, not fines, is key to road safety...

From today, motorists face a £100 fine and having 3 points put on their licence for a range of road safety related offences, including some related to driver distraction or emerging from a side road into the path of another vehicle. But road safety charity IAM says it’s driver education, not fines, that could have a bigger influence on road safety for all users.

In June, the government published its response to a consultation on the proposed amendments to the law first mooted a year earlier, and confirmed it was seeking to make some careless driving-related offences subject to £100 fixed penalty notices, or offer the driver in question remedial training.

One of the reasons behind the change in approach is that all too often, such offences are not prosecuted due to the cost, both financial and in terms of police time, in taken them all the way to court.

The new rules come into effect today. One that is receiving media attention is that motorists will face fines for staying in the middle lane on motorways, but several others touch upon issues of relevance to the safety of vulnerable road users such as cyclists or pedestrians.

Besides the introduction of fixed penalty notices for careless driving, there has also been an increase in the level of fines for some offences already subject to them.

Using a handheld mobile phone, whether for voice calls or to send texts, emails, or check apps or websites – all found by research to be more of a threat to road safety than driving over the permitted alcohol limit, particularly given the rise of smartphone ownership – will now be punishable by a fine of £100, up from £60; as was previously the case, driving licences will be endorsed with 3 points.

Potentially, the prospect of those penalty points could give teeth to the law, since it would be likely to result in higher insurance premiums for the motorist concerned if caught and hit them harder in the pocket, but only if the rules are properly enforced, something that was queried by IAM at the time the chang

In a press release today, IAM summarises some of the aspects of careless driving that will now be subject to a fine as including:

overtaking on the inside
driving inappropriately close to another vehicle
inadvertently driving through a red light
emerging from a side road into the path of another vehicle
tuning a car radio; when the driver was avoidably distracted by this action
selecting and lighting a cigarette or similar when the driver was avoidably distracted by that use.

Its chief executive, Simon Best, cautioned however that the approach to enforcement needed to be carefully targeted if the changes were to have maximum impact.

“If the police target the worst and most persistent offenders this could be good news for road safety,” he explained.

“If, however, it just becomes another numbers game with thousands of careless driving tickets issued then the impact will be limited. 

“The IAM believes that driver retraining courses have a much bigger potential to actually improve poor driving than simply issuing a standard fine and should always be offered as the first stage of prosecution.”

Announcing the changes to the law in June, road safety minister Stephen Hammond said: "Careless drivers are a menace and their negligence puts innocent people's lives at risk.

"That is why we are making it easier for the police to tackle problem drivers by allowing them to immediately issue a fixed penalty notice rather than needing to take every offender to court.

"We are also increasing penalties for a range of driving offences to a level which reflects their seriousness and which will ensure that they are consistent with other similar penalty offences."

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

41 comments

Avatar
andyp | 10 years ago
0 likes

'It sort of strikes me as the sort of behaviour that many cyclists complain about i.e. people behaving as if they own the roads because they are the fastest on the roads.'

Quite the opposite. It's like the cyclists who RLJ moaning because those of us obey the rules are asking them not to give everyone else a bad name.

Avatar
a_to_the_j | 10 years ago
0 likes

@Colin, perhaps outside of London you begin to realise that up here in Scotland we've passed already last years total...

Avatar
s_smith | 10 years ago
0 likes

When you're next driving along a quiet motorway and you spot some twonk in the middle lane, go across the two lanes to over take them in the far-side lane and then head back to the near side lane and lift off the accelerator. If this twonk hasn't taken the hint let him/her/it over take you and repeat the maneuver and see how many rings you can do around the hog until he/she/it finally wakes up and moves into the near side lane. Only attempt this on a very quiet motorway and not on a busy one (apply common sense).

Those individuals getting heated about middle lane hogging seem to be the obnoxious pedants who this law seems to be targeting. If you can't keep up with traffic stick with the lorries doing 50 mph in the near-side lane after all 70mph is the maximum not the required speed.  26

Avatar
kcr | 10 years ago
0 likes

//www.sustrans.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/main_image/public/main-image/nicewaycode2.jpg)

Keith Brown, Scottish Minister of Transport, launching the "Nice Way Code" "mutual respect" campaign. Note the car that is parked beyond the stop line, and which is violating Highway Code 191 by overtaking another vehicle at a pedestrian crossing. The gentleman in the passenger seat is Neil Greig, Director of Policy and Research at the Institue of Advanced Motorists.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to a_to_the_j | 10 years ago
0 likes
a_to_the_j wrote:

@Colin, perhaps outside of London you begin to realise that up here in Scotland we've passed already last years total...

Ah, well you've got me there. It often feels that these pages becoming a venting ground for peoples fears. But as a cyclist you do face risk, but sometimes that risk is unbalanced by the fear people have from reading about dying. A bit like people who fear flying....

I did the Ride Across Britain last year. Your roads are terrible, and I think I felt at most risk when riding in Glencoe. So you have my sympathies.

The buses cared not a jot how close they were. Several were just inches from me. But the maddest thing I experienced was a douche who decided to overtake the on-coming traffic. He gave the car he was overtaking plenty of room, and acted like I wasn't even there, and so was also inches away, but coming at me 'head-on'.

Avatar
Sniffer | 10 years ago
0 likes

The A82 through Glencoe is notorious for being unfriendly to cyclists.

On the positive side there are roads much better suited to cycling in Scotland.

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde replied to Sniffer | 10 years ago
0 likes
Sniffer wrote:

The A82 through Glencoe is notorious for being unfriendly to cyclists.

On the positive side there are roads much better suited to cycling in Scotland.

Yes - the A836 and B871 are super fun.

Avatar
Critchio | 10 years ago
0 likes

The measures won't make a blind bit of difference, period. The reduction in Roads Policing officers, the reducution in response and neighbourhood officers means the officers left are run ragged with high workloads. They have to prioritise their jobs. They are going to treat minor road offences as they do now.... do nothing and let them pass.

Road users (lorry, van, car drivers and even cyclists) have become complacent on our roads and think nothing of committing minor road offences because even if spotted by patrol officers they turn a blind eye because they have jobs stacked up.

Its lip service, nothing more and it won't help.

Avatar
dunnoh | 10 years ago
0 likes

I have seen it many times, empty motorway and cars in the middle lane. Is it really sensible to fine people for this? Its ruddy annoying that's for sure but £60 annoying? Instead of these fines I would like to see better sentencing guidelines and retesting for motorists every few years

Avatar
WolfieSmith | 10 years ago
0 likes

There is no 'slow lane' - or 'fast lane'. It's the inside lane and the over taking lane according to the Police - or used to be.

Instead of fining people for driving faults the government needs invest in Public Info Films to remind people how to drive on motorways, what indicators are for and why they are important and why tailgating is dangerous.

I sympathise with some middle lane hoggers. All the timid folk who used to inhabit the inside lane are now sandwiched between lorries which will not slow to let other lorries pass so block two lanes for miles on end - and the Audi brigade in the outside lane.

Why are Audi drivers so aggressive? There's a psychology doctorate in here somewhere. Looking at all the interior decor from the A3 to the A6 the answer could be the black and chrome boy racer fixtures which make every driver feel a little bit sporty and too quick to be held back by other road users.
Critchio's right. Complacency with a dose of entitlement is increasing. I see cars ignoring red lights on pelican crossings all the time and the 30mph speed limit is a joke to most drivers.

Avatar
a.jumper | 10 years ago
0 likes

IAM is a road safety charity? Lol. In bizarro world maybe.

As many people have said, this means little without more police on the roads to enforce it.

Pages

Latest Comments