Witness appeal: Police seek cyclist who collided with pedestrian on London's Regent St

Pedestrian died from stroke two days after collision in West End last month

by Simon_MacMichael   August 14, 2013  

Regent St CCTV cyclist 1

The Metropolitan Police have issued CCTV images of a cyclist who was involved in a collision with a pedestrian who died of a stroke two days later and have appealed for him, as well as any witnesses, to come forward.

David Purkis, a 58-year-old married father of two from West Wickham in the London Borough of Bromley, died two days after the incident, which took place at the junction of Regent Street and New Burlington Street, W1 at around 5.40pm on Thursday 25 July.

According to police, “Initially both parties appeared uninjured and having spoken with each other at the scene they then carried on their journeys.”

However, on the Saturday, Mr Purkis suffered his fatal stroke. A post-mortem was conducted on Friday 9 August, and police say that they “await the result of further tests.”

Detective Constable Matt Hopgood from Catford Traffic Garage commented: "I would appeal to the cyclist and any witnesses to the collision to contact police.

"Any witness could hold vital information into what happened."

Anyone with information is requested to call the Metropolitan Police's Road Death Investigation Unit in Catford on 0208 285 1574.

It appears from the police's appeal that they may see a link between the collision between the cyclist and Mr Purkis, and the latter's death two days later.

While perceived conflict between pedestrians and cyclists is regularly flagged up as an issue of concern particularly in local media and at police community forums, it is thankfully rare that serious injuries result.

In 2011, the latest year for which figures are available, 99 pedestrians were seriously injured in incidents involving a pedal cycle, with two others killed.

17 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Sad that the pedestrian died. I see a lot of people walk out in the roads without checking because there isn't a car noise to hear, then the screeching of bicycle brakes and choice words between the two usually occurs. Don't see that changing much.

This article sounds like the police are blaming the cyclist for the stroke which sounds like a big leap. I guess he should get McCourt's lawyer (http://road.cc/content/news/90243-appeal-judges-urged-impose-lifetime-ba...) and blame the pedestrian for not wearing a helmet.

posted by TeamCC [146 posts]
14th August 2013 - 21:36

like this
Like (17)

TeamCC wrote:

This article sounds like the police are blaming the cyclist for the stroke which sounds like a big leap. I guess he should get McCourt's lawyer (http://road.cc/content/news/90243-appeal-judges-urged-impose-lifetime-ba...) and blame the pedestrian for not wearing a helmet.

I wouldn't say it is that big a leap, bleeding on the brain etc.

Curious to know did the cyclist run a red, did the pedestrian step out without looking?

And curious as to why the police are following this line of enquiry though, would they do the same if it was a car?

mrmo's picture

posted by mrmo [1073 posts]
14th August 2013 - 22:00

like this
Like (17)

Another big leap here but the most likely medical scenario is an abrupt neck extension causing an internal carotid artery intimal tear (arterial dissection). This causes platelet activation, a clot forms and then can break off later. Very sad. The initial injury may have seemed trivial at the time.

posted by Docroddy [20 posts]
14th August 2013 - 23:13

like this
Like (19)

I think that given a man has died it is only right the police follow up with the cyclist involved. There doesn't appear to be any blame from the police at this point but if the post mortem points towards the injury being caused by the collision then of course it should be followed up.

JaseCD

posted by jasecd [144 posts]
15th August 2013 - 1:22

like this
Like (17)

Obviously it's a tragedy that Mr Purkis is dead,but
it seems to me it would be very difficult to prove any culpability as there is a gap of two days between the incident and the death, and he could have struck his head at another time during that period. Or did he attend a hospital immediately afterwards ?

Enjoy

posted by cisgil23 [47 posts]
15th August 2013 - 8:54

like this
Like (15)

I don't think i can take much more road.cc.. Crying

posted by swelbo [33 posts]
15th August 2013 - 8:59

like this
Like (14)

As I said when they showed the second picture on the news last night 'If that's the best photograph you've got, don't bother!' This country is littered with CCTV cameras but whenever they show a still it looks something like this. I was on a double-decker bus last week sitting on the bottom deck in front of a flat-screen TV showing video images from the bus's TEN cctv cameras.

posted by robert_obrien [117 posts]
15th August 2013 - 9:41

like this
Like (17)

"According to police, “Initially both parties appeared uninjured and having spoken with each other at the scene they then carried on their journeys.”

I wonder quite what they want to talk to him about? Blame culture Britain. I am sorry for the gentleman who passed away, but I sincerely hope the cyclist never hears of this.


Leviathan of Riderstate

bikeboy76's picture

posted by bikeboy76 [1251 posts]
15th August 2013 - 9:46

like this
Like (15)

bikeboy76 wrote:
"According to police, “Initially both parties appeared uninjured and having spoken with each other at the scene they then carried on their journeys.”

I wonder quite what they want to talk to him about? Blame culture Britain. I am sorry for the gentleman who passed away, but I sincerely hope the cyclist never hears of this.

This, you only need to look at the attempts they make to hassle a legal event in CM because they lost a court case.

That area is covered in cctv which makes their call for more information curious.

posted by northstar [1100 posts]
15th August 2013 - 10:08

like this
Like (16)

The comments here make me despair. If this was a cyclist hit by a motorcyclist we'd all be working like mad to try to figure out ways to identify the motorcyclist. Here we're trying to absolve the cyclist.

Why? We're not saints!

If I had hit someone, we'd had "a conversation" ascertained that we were both OK and then I'd ridden off only to find later that the person had died, I'd be horrified and definitely hand myself in. However, I'd also be scared witless of the consequences.

As a matter of fact, many years ago (more than 10) I did hit a pedestrian who ran into the road in front of me. We did have a conversation and then went on our way. I have no idea if a jury would have blamed me for the incident, or her, if it had gone to court.

So I really feel for both families involved and hope this is resolved as soon as possible.

posted by alexb [48 posts]
15th August 2013 - 10:55

like this
Like (9)

alexb wrote:
The comments here make me despair. If this was a cyclist hit by a motorcyclist we'd all be working like mad to try to figure out ways to identify the motorcyclist. Here we're trying to absolve the cyclist.

Which comments are those?

posted by farrell [1401 posts]
15th August 2013 - 12:11

like this
Like (12)

bikeboy76 wrote:
"According to police, “Initially both parties appeared uninjured and having spoken with each other at the scene they then carried on their journeys.”

I wonder quite what they want to talk to him about? Blame culture Britain. I am sorry for the gentleman who passed away, but I sincerely hope the cyclist never hears of this.

Because it's entirely possible the collision was a major contributor to his death. Two days doesn't mean anything. If you shoot someone and they die two days later it's not your fault?

I am not saying the cyclist was at fault for the collision. There is no information about that. But to say that the collision and his death can't be related is moronic.

posted by DrJDog [108 posts]
15th August 2013 - 12:50

like this
Like (13)

With no details as the collision, it impossible to say who (if anyone) was at fault at the collision.
The Police have said the cyclist stopped and spoke to the man afterwards, so it wasn't as if he was trying to get away.
I hope he come forward, but it will be hard to link the collision to the stroke and prove blame for the collision (unless they have some better CCTV).

Those pictures are useless. The first looks like a generic male London cycle commuter (look similar to me!) and the seconds looks like a shot from a late 80s commuter game.

posted by thereverent [298 posts]
15th August 2013 - 12:56

like this
Like (10)

alexb wrote:
The comments here make me despair. If this was a cyclist hit by a motorcyclist we'd all be working like mad to try to figure out ways to identify the motorcyclist. Here we're trying to absolve the cyclist.

Why? We're not saints!

If I had hit someone, we'd had "a conversation" ascertained that we were both OK and then I'd ridden off only to find later that the person had died, I'd be horrified and definitely hand myself in. However, I'd also be scared witless of the consequences.

As a matter of fact, many years ago (more than 10) I did hit a pedestrian who ran into the road in front of me. We did have a conversation and then went on our way. I have no idea if a jury would have blamed me for the incident, or her, if it had gone to court.

So I really feel for both families involved and hope this is resolved as soon as possible.

+1

Last night I would have considered trading a very loud baby for a really nice bike.

posted by notfastenough [3099 posts]
15th August 2013 - 13:02

like this
Like (10)

notfastenough wrote:
alexb wrote:
The comments here make me despair. If this was a cyclist hit by a motorcyclist we'd all be working like mad to try to figure out ways to identify the motorcyclist. Here we're trying to absolve the cyclist.

Why? We're not saints!

If I had hit someone, we'd had "a conversation" ascertained that we were both OK and then I'd ridden off only to find later that the person had died, I'd be horrified and definitely hand myself in. However, I'd also be scared witless of the consequences.

As a matter of fact, many years ago (more than 10) I did hit a pedestrian who ran into the road in front of me. We did have a conversation and then went on our way. I have no idea if a jury would have blamed me for the incident, or her, if it had gone to court.

So I really feel for both families involved and hope this is resolved as soon as possible.

+1

+2

Feel the fear and do it anyway

hood's picture

posted by hood [117 posts]
15th August 2013 - 17:52

like this
Like (11)

- 3

posted by northstar [1100 posts]
15th August 2013 - 18:15

like this
Like (13)

An accident has happened. Someone has sadly died as a result of this incedent. Condolences to the family and friends of the victim.
Let's hope the cyclist has the courage to step forward and help the family make some sense of this.

Quote:
Sad that the pedestrian died. I see a lot of people walk out in the roads without checking because there isn't a car noise to hear, then the screeching of bicycle brakes and choice words between the two usually occurs. Don't see that changing much.

I generally look where I'm going and shout a warning, saves lots of problems.

KalaBlinds 'cos we all need our beauty sleep.

posted by don simon [144 posts]
15th August 2013 - 19:12

like this
Like (9)