Tour de France Stage 10: Marcel Kittel doubles up as he outsprints André Greipel in Saint-Malo

Mark Cavendish third in frenetic finale, Chris Froome safely home in the yellow jersey

by Simon_MacMichael   July 9, 2013  

Tour de France 100 logo

Marcel Kittel of Argos Shimano came round Lotto Belisol's André Greipel to win Stage 10 of the Tour de France as Germany's fastest sprinters went head to head in Saint-Malo this afternoon. In a frenetic finale Omega Pharma-Quick Step's Mark Cavendish brushed Kittel's team mate Tom Veelers, the latter crashing to the ground, but Cavendish staying upright to claim third.

After taking it easy for much of the day, It was a nervous peloton that came into the final 25 kilometres of the stage as the race hit a coastline buffeted by stromg winds.

With a number of teams battling for position, the pace towards the end was flat out, but the race stayed together and Team Sky's Chris Froome retains the race leader's yellow jersey. The first wearer of it in this year's race, Kittel, becomes the first man to win two stages in this year's race.

Following an explosive weekend in the Pyrenees and yesterday’s rest day in Saint-Nazaire, the 100th edition of the race resumed today with a 197km stage from Saint-Gildas-des-Bois to Saint-Malo, with a bunch sprint widely anticipated under the ramparts of the historic port city.

With a crucial individual time trial stage taking place tomorrow with the finish at the iconic setting of Mont-Saint-Michel, the peloton eased off the gas for most of the stage, while keeping a watchful eye on the day's break as the race headed north through Britanny.

The five escapees – Breton native Julian Simon of Sojasun, Europcar’s Jerome Cousin, Euskaltel’s Juanjo Oroz, the Cofidis rider Luis Angel Mate, and Vacansoleil-DCM’s Lieuwe Westra – had got away around 15 kilometres after the start.

They would remain out in front until around 5 kilometres out, their maximum advantage standing at five minutes, the prize at the intermediate sprint at Le Hingle, 69.5 kilometres from the finish, going to Mate, while it was Westra who sprinted ahead to take the maximum mountains points.

In the main bunch, the final points on offer at that intermediate sprint were contested,Greipel prevailing over Cannondale’s Peter Sagan and Cavendish barely denting Sagan’s commanding lead, although thise finish line points help narrow the gap further.

As the race headed towards a zig-zagging route along the coast for the final 25 kilometres or so, the pace increased and there was some jostling for position, nervousness rippling through the peloton with the prospect of a cross tailwind gusting at up to 40 kilometres an hour raising the risk of the group splitting into echelons.

That meant that it was not just teams looking to set up their sprinters that were fighting at the front, but also those with riders towards the top of the General Classification, with the likes of Alberto Contador’s Saxo-Tinkoff and Team Sky, working for race leader Chris Froome, looking to keep their leaders out of trouble.

As it turned out, the peloton stayed together, although the nervous mood in the peloton meant some crashes were inevitable, with Vacansoleil-DCM’s Juan Antonio Flecha, Garmin-Sharp’s Andrew Talansky and Orica-GreenEdge’s Svein Tuft among those involved in chutes.

The final crash was the one that brought down Veelers just a few dozen metres before the line. The Dutchman, who had finished the leadout for Kittel, seemed to drift slightly across to his right just as Cavendish, desperately trying to remain in the fight for the win, came round him, although it would seem harsh to apportion blame exclusively to either rider.

17 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

......although it would seem harsh to apportion blame to either rider

How about both at fault?

My take on it, is,

Veelers looked beind/right and must have seen Cavendish looming, he then drifted what looked like intentionally to his right, which must have hindered Cavendish. It looked like Cavendish then saw the red mist and deliberately veered into Veelers.

posted by wwfcb [72 posts]
9th July 2013 - 16:25

3 Likes

wwfcb wrote:
......although it would seem harsh to apportion blame to either rider

How about both at fault?

My take on it, is,

Veelers looked beind/right and must have seen Cavendish looming, he then drifted what looked like intentionally to his right, which must have hindered Cavendish. It looked like Cavendish then saw the red mist and deliberately veered into Veelers.

I must have been watching the same broadcast as you.

posted by si4star [46 posts]
9th July 2013 - 16:41

3 Likes

Brushed!?!

"I can't believe I ate the whole thing..."

Cooks's picture

posted by Cooks [496 posts]
9th July 2013 - 16:55

2 Likes

Cooks wrote:
Brushed!?!

Beat me to it! (And he nicked a tape recorder...)

posted by The Rumpo Kid [590 posts]
9th July 2013 - 16:57

2 Likes

Looking at it from behind, It looked like they were both at fault.

Head on, Veelers moves slightly and Cav comes across him.

FRONT ON, that's the telling view. You see Cav look, grit his teeth and then full on body check him.

Gkam84's picture

posted by Gkam84 [9080 posts]
9th July 2013 - 17:07

3 Likes

Added a word in to clarify: "to apportion blame *exclusively* to either rider."

As for "brush" - the initial replays I saw suggested minimal contact rather than a full-on barge... it's not going to take much to bring you down at that speed.

Simon_MacMichael's picture

posted by Simon_MacMichael [8659 posts]
9th July 2013 - 18:04

4 Likes

Looked to me like Cav put his body into it intentionally too...

posted by wrevilo [63 posts]
9th July 2013 - 18:36

2 Likes

After his few bad sprints and Henderson and then Veelers blocking him I'm not surprised he may/ or may not have knocked down Veelers.

CornishSprinter's picture

posted by CornishSprinter [26 posts]
9th July 2013 - 19:22

3 Likes

My opinion (for what it's worth...) is that Veelers was primarily at fault. Sitting up in a sprint and then not holding your line is bound to have a negative effect. Cav had to take a line to get round Veelers to try and get on the wheel he needs, with Veelers swerving towards him. The reflex is then to brace for the inevitable impact. Veelers should have held his line - simple. There's no way Cav would deliberately take Veelers down, but at the same time he's not going to volunteer to crash himself to save him. Race official's judgement was spot on.

posted by fatty [74 posts]
9th July 2013 - 19:27

2 Likes

Good thing Twingo stayed at home. He could have been humiliated.

I wonder if we will see a repeat of Vuelta '12. Froome goes early then bails out in the later stages. And it was same for VV.

posted by dogcc [131 posts]
9th July 2013 - 21:36

1 Like

Did anyone see Cavs tweet?

"Definitely knocked a cyclists off his bike earlier - I have right of way #bloodycyclists"

posted by Colin Peyresourde [1229 posts]
9th July 2013 - 21:40

0 Likes

Colin Peyresourde wrote:
Did anyone see Cavs tweet?

"Definitely knocked a cyclists off his bike earlier - I have right of way #bloodycyclists"

Brilliant - Big Grin

THere is only bad choice of clothing, not bad weather. MTFU and get out there and ride.
A little mantra for me in the winter months

posted by stealfwayne [81 posts]
10th July 2013 - 7:27

3 Likes

I'm going to go with, erm, emotional: lost his train, got hindered and took a little bit of a swipe at Veelers...

I'm fairly sure that both of them knew what they were doing. As wwfcb said above, Veelers looked and moved. But, Cav braced himself and looked back on the run in to the line. I'm fairly sure that I wouldn't have bothered if I thought Veelers was all at fault.

Hey ho, the commissaires have made their decision - the race goes on - maybe there'll be some afters in the upcoming stages.....

posted by Jimbonic [113 posts]
10th July 2013 - 8:08

1 Like

Jimbonic wrote:
I'm going to go with, erm, emotional: lost his train, got hindered and took a little bit of a swipe at Veelers...

I'm fairly sure that both of them knew what they were doing. As wwfcb said above, Veelers looked and moved. But, Cav braced himself and looked back on the run in to the line. I'm fairly sure that I wouldn't have bothered if I thought Veelers was all at fault.

Hey ho, the commissaires have made their decision - the race goes on - maybe there'll be some afters in the upcoming stages.....

That's my honest view. I don't think Cav is proud of his actions and I think he showed some level of remorse by pulling up after the accident.

To quote the football pundits, Veelers went down easy, not intentionally, but I don't think Cav thought his bump would send him down.

I'm sure they will kiss and make up.....

posted by Colin Peyresourde [1229 posts]
10th July 2013 - 11:11

4 Likes

Veelers deliberately blocked Cavendish to protect Kittel. Had Cav not knocked him off, we would be talking about that instead.

posted by jamtartman [45 posts]
10th July 2013 - 12:14

3 Likes

jamtartman wrote:
Veelers deliberately blocked Cavendish to protect Kittel. Had Cav not knocked him off, we would be talking about that instead.

Not an expert on cycle racing but I was watching the highlights last night and I was calling Mr Cavendish all the names under the sun. But was thinking about it this morning out on the bike and watching it again I agree with the gentleman above (jamtartman brilliant). It may! Not of been intentional but it definitely impeded Cavendish's line to the finish

posted by sodit [76 posts]
10th July 2013 - 14:23

3 Likes

OP-QS ought to re-evaluate their roster for next season. Such a good team, they have one guy too many on the team that they could do without. Especially with a sinister and horrible attitude from this one rider that we've come to know.

posted by dogcc [131 posts]
10th July 2013 - 18:50

2 Likes