2007 Giro winner Danilo Di Luca is provisionally suspended, and out of this year's race, after the WADA-accredited lab in Cologne returned a positive result for EPO from a sample collected in an out-of-competition test on 29 April 2013.
Di Luca isn't a stranger to doping controversy; He twice tested positive for CERA during the 2009 Giro, and as a result was suspended for two years, returning to competition in October 2010 after the ban was reduced to nine months. His Giro win in 2007 was also controversial after he gave an irregular sample after stage 17 to Monte Zoncolan which suggested an illegal blood transfusion, although he was later cleared due to insufficient evidence.
Vini Fantini have been quick to distance themselves from Di Luca. The team has ended his contract with immediate effect, and told the rider to make his own way home. "Danilo Di Luca was part of the team mainly due to his friendship with (team sponsor) Valentino Sciotti", said team manager Angelo Citracca. "He has repaid the trust of a friend with yet another mistake. The consequences will affect the whole of a team which has been working for years to discover and train young riders."
Here's the UCI release in full:
This morning the UCI advised Italian rider Danilo Di Luca that he is provisionally suspended. The decision to provisionally suspend this rider was made in response to a report from the WADA accredited laboratory in Köln indicating an Adverse Analytical Finding of EPO in a urine sample collected from him in an out of competition test on 29 April 2013.
The provisional suspension of Mr. Danilo Di Luca remains in force until a hearing panel convened by the Italian Cycling Federation determines whether he has committed an anti-doping rule violation under Article 21 of the UCI Anti-Doping Rules. Mr. Danilo Di Luca has the right to request and attend the analysis of his B sample.
Under the World Anti-Doping Code and the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the UCI is unable to provide any additional information at this time.
Add new comment
37 comments
Well let's see, he is leading the race in what appears to be a very dirty sport. People don't cheat so they can place well, they cheat to win. Ergo the leader of the race is most likely the biggest cheat.....oh, and guess what happened with Lance.
I would also look at his team, which has a record of doping cheats, Vinokourov and Contador (oh yes, and that man Lance again) to name the main ones.
If you also think that a full minute on a 20k time trial is down to Specialized giving him a better bike I would say you've been digging too deep with the cotton buds. I know Thursday's TT was uphill, but his performance in the first ITT was too good to be true, let alone his second.
.....I might also add lets not be completely naive about the sport of cycling.....
Even though I suspect that they are all doping doesn't mean I can't enjoy the race. I just find it less enjoyable if some nutmucker juices himself so much that it stifles the competition. It's like playing a computer game with all the cheat modes on. You may get to see a finale, but the satisfaction from accomplishment is absent.
Robert Millar wrote a piece over at Cycling news about Di Luca missing the evolution, being a Dodo.
I do not agree with it completely, while there is a technical evolution on the drugs side, society has not changed much, basically doping is like a risk assesment, what can I gain, what do I have to lose?
I did rather decide not to write a new piece for my blog, as I think I've said it all before:
http://innercitymobility.blogspot.de/2012/10/bad-boys-special-substances...
The relationship society - individual - drugs can be found about 1/3 rd into the post.
Want a guess what comes next?
How about denial? Yes, denial has a name, which can be found here:
http://innercitymobility.blogspot.de/2013/01/sundays-editorial-armstrong...
Writing a cycling blog these days has become so much easier, re-place the name and re-post!
I sincerely hope you are right and I am just a cynical old c**t.
Nibali seems to want to get the IRA involved!
http://m.cyclingnews.com/videos/vincenzo-nibali-talks-about-danilo-di-lu...
Positively a typo in the headline #pedant
Di Luca's mistake was not buying a bloodtesting machine for UCI.
But what about the rest of them. Nibali from the Ferarri stable, Evans, Scarponi, Santambrogio, to name a few we know have dodgy pasts and present.
Pages