Short trips by car must be made "abnormal" for Active Travel Bill to succeed, academic tells Welsh Assembly

Cycling and walking also need to overcome perception of being "eccentric and odd," says transport expert

by Simon_MacMichael   April 29, 2013  

National Assembly for Wales..jpg

A transport academic has told Welsh Assembly Members that car use particularly for short journeys must be made to feel “abnormal and exceptional” while cycling and walking must overcome the perception of being “eccentric and odd” if Wales is to achieve the increase in sustainable travel such as cycling and walking contemplated by the country’s Active Travel Bill.

The bill, unveiled earlier this year, aims to make Wales the first country in the world where all local authorities are obliged by law to draw up and implement plans for a comprehensive network of routes for those on foot or two wheels.

Professor Colin Pooley of the Lancaster Environment Centre outlined research from the Understanding Walking and Cycling (UWAC) project, a collaboration between Lancaster, Leeds and Oxford Brookes universities, which published its findings in 2011.

Findings highlighted by Professor Pooley to Assembly Members - you can read the full text here - included that while busy roads are a deterrent to many would-be cyclists, for pedestrians, the opposite applies – it is areas with low footfall that they perceive as presenting most risk to personal safety.

“The key message that comes from this research is that at present in Britain using the car for short trips in urban areas is convenient, habitual and normal,” he explained.

“It is what people expect to do, what most people expect others to do, and what many other people who have yet to benefit from car ownership aspire to do.

“Alternatives to the car – especially cycling and walking – are perceived to take too much effort, need planning and equipment that causes hassle, and may be risky and uncomfortable. They also run the risk of being perceived by others as eccentric or odd.

“These are all powerful reasons for not walking and cycling and for using the car for most short trips in urban areas.”

Professor Pooley said that changes to working practices such as increased adoption of flexible hours as well as a rethink of areas such as welfare and education were needed to help make it easier for families to adapt their routines to walking and cycling and thereby reduce their dependency on cars for short journeys.

“We believe that there needs to be a co-ordinated and integrated approach to the delivery of active and sustainable travel in Britain with a real commitment from a wide range of governmental, charity and private-sector organisations,” he added.

“While improvements to infrastructure alone would be welcome, they are unlikely on their own to make a large difference to levels of active travel. A much more significant package of measures is necessary to create an urban environment where a significant proportion of the population feel confident cycling and believe that walking or cycling are the obvious and sensible choices for everyday travel.

“Only in this way will Britain achieve the levels of active travel currently seen in some other north-west European countries.”

He added that while the bill demonstrated that the Welsh Assembly Government “is ahead of the rest of the UK and can set an important precedent to encourage and enable more active travel,” it should also be accompanied by restrictions on car use.

He also said that potential barriers to the bill’s success include “financial constraints that may limit the level of investment in new infrastructure… objections from those who see any attempt to promote active travel as an attack on motorists and… the potential for inertia within a culture and society which sees motorised traffic as the norm.”

The UWAC project was based on responses from 1,417 people to a questionnaire sent to 15,000 households in Lancaster, Leeds, Leicester and Worcester, with the sample intended to be representative of the population as a whole, rather than specifically targeting cyclists and walkers. Some 80 interviews were then conducted with selected respondents.

The findings were published in 2011 and you can download the full report here.

The key recommendations of the study, as outlined by Professor Pooley to Welsh Assembly Members, are:

First, it is essential that the urban environment is made safe for cyclists and pedestrians. This requires the provision of fully segregated cycle routes on all arterial and other busy roads in urban areas. It is clear from the research that most non-cyclists and recreational cyclists will only consider cycling regularly if they are segregated from traffic and that pedestrians are hostile to pavement cyclists.

Second, pedestrian routes must be made as welcoming as possible to increase footfall. This could include widening pavements, removing street furniture that obstructs pavements and ensuring that pavements are well lit, well maintained and kept free of leaves and ice.

Third, there need to be effective restrictions on traffic speeds, parking and access on all residential roads and other routes without segregated cycle and pedestrian paths so that both cyclists and pedestrians feel that they have a safe and convenient environment in which to travel. This could include 20mph speed limits and resident-only access by car in some areas.

Fourth, the system of legal liability on roads used by the public should be changed to protect the most vulnerable road users (cyclists and pedestrians).  One approach would be to adopt ‘strict liability’ so that pedestrians or cyclists injured in an accident involving a motor vehicle do not have to prove fault in seeking compensation.   Forms of ‘strict liability are adopted in much of continental Europe and while not changing criminal responsibility they place a civil responsibility on drivers to obtain insurance that will pay vulnerable victims independently of fault.  This may act as an incentive for car drivers to behave in a way that protects the most vulnerable road users.

Fifth, there need to be changes in the spatial structure and organisation of the built environment, enforced through planning legislation, to make accessing common services and facilities on foot or by bike easy. This would require the development of more neighbourhood shopping centres within walking or cycling distance of most people, restrictions on out-of-town developments, provision of secure bicycle parking facilities and the provision of cycle storage in most homes.

Sixth, there need to be wider societal and economic changes to give people the flexibility to travel more sustainably. Polices (that already exist in many countries) could include the greater use of flexi hours so that walking and cycling could be more easily fitted into a household routine, more family-friendly welfare policies so that in families with small children one parent could afford to reduce working hours and thus be less constrained by time commitments, and more equitable educational provision so that most children attended a school close to home.

Seventh, it is necessary to change the image of cycling and walking. To a great extent this should be consequential on the above changes: as more people walk and cycle then more people will accept it as normal. However, campaigns to promote walking and cycling as normal and something accessible to all and not dominated by super-fit or unusually committed specialists should also be adopted.

9 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

Interesting. I was in a small supermarket in Eltham on Saturday and asked if there was a bigger supermarket nearby as their wine selection was tiny. "The other one is a short 5 minute drive away." I'm walking, I said. He looked at me as if I was an alien. "You're walking?! Man, it will take ages."

It wouldn't occur to me to drive short distances even if I owned a car. I prefer to walk.

posted by Tom Amos [246 posts]
29th April 2013 - 12:18

2 Likes

I gave up my car in March 12. I've never been happier.

mingmong's picture

posted by mingmong [214 posts]
29th April 2013 - 12:44

1 Like

None of this is rocket science.

Money has been spent in Shrewsbury on making some parts more ped and cyclist-friendly but it's still choked with cars because there isn't the incentive for most drivers to get off their arses and walk, cycle or take the bus.

The town has an excellent P&R service (£1.60 return) yet loads of people drive into the town centre then moan about queueing or the lack of spaces. Blinkered shop owners complain that parking charges deter shoppers yet conveniently forget that Pride Hill used to be two-way traffic and the narrow pavements were not much fun to negotiate; now it's car-free and far nicer (and busier).

The sooner councils grasp the nettle and act to restrict motor traffic the better it will be for everyone.

Simon E's picture

posted by Simon E [2053 posts]
29th April 2013 - 13:18

1 Like

Finally someone talking complete and utter sense !! Nerd

posted by gazer117 [26 posts]
29th April 2013 - 14:16

4 Likes

We're living in a nightmare where the motor manufacturers have successfully brainwashed the public into worshipping the car no matter how unhappy it makes us.

nowasps's picture

posted by nowasps [263 posts]
29th April 2013 - 14:37

4 Likes

It's also just laziness and low expectations of what constitutes physical effort. Two years ago Sefton ran a 'five miles to fitness' day encouraging women to cycle a whole 5 miles. The few women that took part arrived at the sponsor tent at the finish ( with it's groaning table of drinks and junk food) were raring to carry on for longer.

Sounding like an old fart now but if you could show my grandparents generation what the motorcar has done to the endurance of the British public they'd be appalled.

Silly me. You're probably right....

MercuryOne's picture

posted by MercuryOne [1093 posts]
29th April 2013 - 16:53

6 Likes

The last change is odd: how do we get people who don't care to lead campaigns?

posted by a.jumper [726 posts]
30th April 2013 - 8:07

3 Likes

There's a lot more evidence from the Understanding Walking and Cycling project on my blog, Thinking About Cycling; see here:

http://thinkingaboutcycling.wordpress.com/

In particular, clicking on 'cycling struggles' in the categories column will get you to a series of posts which explore the various reasons people do/don't cycle for ordinary journeys.

I'm a sociologist and was a researcher on the project.
Cheers
Dave Horton

thinking about cycling's picture

posted by thinking about ... [1 posts]
30th April 2013 - 9:12

3 Likes

I find that what usually makes clear sense usually means its far from the truth in how people perceive being active and using the car.

Duncan Bannatyne made it clear in Dragons Den when presented with some muppet who was looking for funding for a meditation chair that he claimed helped you lose weight and get motivated to get up and be more active.

Mt Bannatyne said
'the problem with obesity and with being active is to get people to take responsibility for there own health'.

Looks like guy above has got it right

Like or not people care less about there health than they do driving those couple of inches closer to where they want to go.

posted by Ciaran Patrick [119 posts]
4th May 2013 - 9:52

3 Likes