Home
10-month prison sentence and 12-month ban for serial lawbreaker... but he says it won't stop him...

A motorist convicted and jailed for driving while disqualified for the 43rd time told Suffolk police that it wouldn't stop him driving again, one of his victims has said t it is only a matter of time before the motorist, John Moir, kills.

Simon Jacobs who was left him with life changing injuries by Moir's driving in 2010 made the comments after Moir was found guilty for the 43rd time of driving while disqualified. The motorist has been jailed for four months for that offence, with other charges taking his total sentence to ten months, and he has also been banned from driving for a year. It is the latest of a number of cases highlighting the extent to which some people repeatedly ignore driving bans.

Moir, aged 46 and from Rushmere St Andrew in Suffolk, pleaded guilty to driving while disqualified, driving without insurance and two counts of theft, reports the Ipswich Star.

Previously, in 2010 Moir, who has amassed a total of 218 driving offences, received an 18 month prison term following an incident that left pedestrian Simon Jacobs with what were described as life changing injuries.

Reacting to news of Moir’s latest sentence, Mr Jacobs told the Ipswich Star: “He has left me with a life sentence, I will never get over my injuries.

“As a result of my brain injury I suffer something called ballistic rage because I can’t work, but this has left me seething.

“When he ran into me he got 18 months, but only served half.

“The next time it was 14 months and now 10.

“It is an insult. I believe it is only a matter of time before he kills someone. I was lucky but next time things could be very different. I just find it ludicrous, it is laughable.

“The justice system needs to listen up, they are playing a waiting game – eventually I believe he will kill someone.”

Moir’s latest driving ban was for two years, imposed in September 2011. South East Suffolk Magistrates Court has now replaced that with a new, 12-month ban.

He’s by no means the only driver in Britain to have been found guilty of driving while disqualified on dozens of occasions.

In 2010, The Sun reported that mobile DJ Thomas Feely from Leeds had notched up his 113th motoring offence, and had been jailed on more than 30 occasions.

As he received another prison sentence for driving while disqualified, apparently the 55th time he had been convicted of that offence, his defence lawyer warned, “He’ll be back.”

In 2008, former nightclub bouncer Jamie Manderson from Swindon was banned for five years after his 51st conviction for driving while disqualified.

The first of those was secured when he was aged just 15, and Metro, reporting on that 2008 conviction, said Manderson had never actually held a driving licence.

His lawyer described him as a “likeable idiot” - one who, it transpires, in 1998 hit a 12-year-old cyclist while driving a getaway car involved in a robbery.

Last year, a sheriff in Scotland handed a lifetime ban from driving to 42-year-old Andrew Winsborough of Kelty, Fife for life after he was convicted for the fifteenth time of driving while disqualified.

According to the BBC, Sheriff Lindsay Foulis also described the maximum 12-month prison sentence that applies in Scotland for driving while disqualified as “wholly inadequate” and called for it to be increased.

That is still harsher than the maximum six-month sentence that applies in England and Wales.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

31 comments

Avatar
Son of Crunch [12 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I feel that yet another prison sentence won't make any difference to this half witted twat, or any other of the countless monkeys driving around without a care in the world regarding law, or anyone else  14

Avatar
cidermart [486 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Pathetic! Things will only change if an MP's child gets injured or killed. Change the laws you f@*!ing idiots you work for us.

Avatar
antonio [1103 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Some one should hire a 'hitman'.

Avatar
JonSP [61 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Confiscate their vehicle. Every time.

Avatar
mrmo [2016 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

i know it won't stop them, but sorry they should be banned for life. one year bans send out a completely wrong signal.

As for actually stopping them driving? short of life imprisonment not sure what can really be done.

Avatar
Simmo72 [584 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

A good kicking down a dark alley would be a sound starting point for scum like this, the courts and legal system do nothing for this type of problem

Avatar
Jerm [39 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

The courts and legal system are constrained by the laws that parliament set. Driving whilst disqualified has a maximum sentence of 6 months. The courts are obliged to give a third off for a guilty plea bringing that down to four months of which he will serve a maximum of half. There's nothing a court can do about that.

Avatar
Matt_S [234 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I can imagine that it wont be long before the sentencing of our glorious judicial system results in people taking their own action.

Avatar
JulesW [36 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Surely he can have an ASBO or one of those curfew things on his ankle.. How ridiculous!

Avatar
Raleigh [1665 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Anyone know what car he drives?

Avatar
benwaite [9 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Why do we bother abiding by the laws of the land? There is no fit punishment. People will only stop committing offences if there are consequences to their actions.

Avatar
ubercurmudgeon [169 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's getting to be like the opposite of 1984. In George Orwell's novel, people believed to have committed crimes of mere thought are subjected to their worst nightmare, to reprogram them into slavish conformity. In 2013, people who injure other citizens get a slap on the wrist, spit in the face of the justice system, do it again, and get an even milder slap on the wrist. If their crimes are committed behind the wheel of a car that is. If you wanted to program people to become even worse drivers than they are already, you couldn't come up with a better system to do so.

Avatar
sfichele [140 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

"The courts and legal system are constrained by the laws that parliament set. Driving whilst disqualified has a maximum sentence of 6 months. The courts are obliged to give a third off for a guilty plea bringing that down to four months of which he will serve a maximum of half. There's nothing a court can do about that."

In which case doesn't 43 x 2 months equal 7+ years in prison?

Avatar
crash144019 [45 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Numerous convictions for the same offence over and over again show these people have no respect for the law or those they will go on to maim and kill

Avatar
djcritchley [181 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Raleigh wrote:

Anyone know what car he drives?

He doesn't drive a car, he's banned from driving ... oh wait a minute!

I have never seen the point of a court banning somebody from driving who is found guilty of driving whilst disqualified, Isn't it likely that having ignored that sentence in the past they will do so again?

Avatar
Jerm [39 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

To sfichele
You're not going to like this but no. Because it is what is referred to as a summary only offence, even if he were sentenced for 10 offences at the same time, the maximum sentence would still be 6 months in prison. Of course, if he were sentenced separately, he could go to prison each time. Prior to 1988, the sentence was higher. I think it was 2 years then. I suppose, like now, they didn't want prisons full of people committing driving offences. Parliament have now actually made it more difficult to lock people up for such offences. You now can't remand someone in custody if they commit a summary only offence except in very rare circumstances so the bloke referred to above, provided he wasn't on bail at the time, could not be kept in custody prior to conviction.

Avatar
benb [77 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I honestly don't know what we can do with people like this. A longer jail sentence might focus his mind somewhat, but maybe a heavy community order would be better.

How can we physically stop people like this from driving? I don't know.

Avatar
benb [77 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
"JonSP" wrote:

Confiscate their vehicle. Every time.

This has merit. No matter whose vehicle it is, it should be confiscated and sold (unless it was stolen).

On the basis that no-one should allow or permit a disqualified driver to use their vehicle.

Avatar
pepita1 [175 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I wonder if any of the victims have brought civil suits against the drivers? And in the criminal proceedings, why hasn't the judge awarded substantial recompense to the victim? Garnish the criminal's wages (if they've got a job and if they don't use the old testament's punishments!)

Avatar
Karbon Kev [688 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

this stupid situation will only change when laws are changed, meanwhile the madness continues

Avatar
Gizmo_ [1333 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's an interesting question isn't it - the law can only hand out certain punishments, and if the miscreant is happy to spend time in the big house every now and again what harm is it?

All I can say is: if this Moir guy (and others) refuse to respect the rule of law of this country, they had BETTER not be receiving any help or support from the state.

Avatar
md6 [181 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

it is a disgrace, that many offenses should be taken into account and a new offence created to deal with it. Banning someone from driving because they were driving whilst banned from driving, just proves 'the law is an ass'. Confiscate the car, fine massively, remove access to the majority of benefits, and inprosonment. Each count should carry its own seperate penalty, 42x6 months might make him think a bit more about what he's doing. Oh I don't know, chop his hands off then he can't drive...

Avatar
bikepixi [12 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I agree, ASBO him. And crush his car. Then park it back through his front window.

Avatar
Animal [41 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's only like 1984 if The Establishment feels endangered.

If YOU as a person feel endangered, then feel free to fuck off and die.

But make a tweet which The Establishment feels threatens its supremacy, however stupid and drunken that tweet may be and you could end up in jail for four years

That's how much The Establishment values its own protection over your protection,

The Law in the country is an ass. You have just better be ultra careful, and hopefully never need it. It's not FOR you and me.

Avatar
Simon E [2539 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Animal wrote:

It's only like 1984 if The Establishment feels endangered.

If YOU as a person feel endangered, then feel free to fuck off and die.

But make a tweet which The Establishment feels threatens its supremacy, however stupid and drunken that tweet may be and you could end up in jail for four years

That's how much The Establishment values its own protection over your protection,

The Law in the country is an ass. You have just better be ultra careful, and hopefully never need it. It's not FOR you and me.

Sadly, this is so very true. You can't even make a public protest any more - ask the UK Uncut protesters in Fortnum & Mason about how they were treated, or the Oxbridge Boat Race protestor. And we have the scaremongering that pushed through those lovely anti-terror laws.

Part of me wants this unrepentant, lawless driver to receive a good backstreet 'education'. The more rational part thinks that crushing his car and many, many hours of very visible Community Service hours (and a much longer ban) would be more useful, and less expensive.

Avatar
Actium [38 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Simmo72 wrote:

A good kicking down a dark alley would be a sound starting point for scum like this, the courts and legal system do nothing for this type of problem

You could get a hefty sentence for that. You'd be better off running him over using a car.

Avatar
Simon E [2539 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Actium wrote:

You could get a hefty sentence for that. You'd be better off running him over using a car.

And just a paltry fine if he was on a bicycle.

Avatar
cidermart [486 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

No doubt some human rights parasite will say it breaks his if he was made to do community service. The law appears to favour the perpitrator rather than the victim and there isn't an MP with the spuds to do anything about it. Totally agree crush his car at his expense.

Avatar
sidesaddle [77 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

You may be surprised to hear that there are assorted motorcycle groups who take a dim view of this sort of thing, and rarely concern themselves with an individuals human rights...

Avatar
fatbeggaronabike [757 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

As both JonSP and benb have said take the car away.

I thought that was a given considering as a disqualified driver they would not have insurance and as some police forces PR Depts are keen to point out that's what happens to uninsured cars.

Pages