Home
Verdict expected next week from Court of Arbitration for Sport

Katusha is to take the UCI to court over its decision to deny the team a WorldTour place for 2013, appealing to sport's highest court to attempt to regain its place in cycling's premier competition.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport will be presenting a verdict next week on the team's fate.

Currently the omission of Katusha from the WorldTour means that, assuming it is granted a Professional Continental licence, the team backed by Russian billionaire Igor Makarov, who sits on the UCI Management Committee, it will need to rely on wild card invites to be able to take part in cycling’s biggest races.

The UCI already allocated its quote of 18 team licences before the CAS made its verdict.

The UCI rules state that riders on a non-registered team are free to seek employment elsewhere without penalty. Joaquim Rodríguez, the top-ranked rider in the world and a Katusha member, has already expressed disappointment with the team, and it seems increasingly likely he will go elsewhere for 2014, and perhaps sooner given the UCI's decision.

Last month the CAS denied Katusha temporary registration as a UCI ProTeam, but promised quick resolution to its appeal.

The CAS statement read: "The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has rejected a request for provisional measures filed by Katusha Management SA asking for the temporary registration of its professional team in the 2013 UCI ProTour.

"The CAS will now consider the main appeal of Katusha Management SA which requests that the decision of the Licensing Commission of the UCI of 18 December 2012 concerning Katusha be annulled and that Katusha be admitted to the UCI ProTour for the entire 2013 season. A hearing will be scheduled shortly in order for a final decision to be issued as quickly as possible."

After an unpromising start, having to be bribed by her parents to learn to ride without stabilisers, Sarah became rather keener on cycling in her university years, and was eventually persuaded to upgrade to proper road cycling by the prospect of a shiny red Italian bike, which she promptly destroyed by trapping a pair of knickers in the rear derailleur. Sarah writes about about cycling every weekend on road.cc.

4 comments

Avatar
doc [167 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

And if it gets granted, do UCI dump one of the existing 18 (cue court case), or go with 19 teams, reducing the wild card Pro-Conti teams already announced for some races,(cue court action), or ignore their own rules and move to a 23 team/207 rider format for one season (cue organisers claiming money because of the expense of another team with a last minute rule change). Another fine mess....

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael [2452 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes
doc wrote:

And if it gets granted, do UCI dump one of the existing 18 (cue court case), or go with 19 teams, reducing the wild card Pro-Conti teams already announced for some races,(cue court action), or ignore their own rules and move to a 23 team/207 rider format for one season (cue organisers claiming money because of the expense of another team with a last minute rule change). Another fine mess....

I asked UCI comms director Enrico Carpani that last month. Here's the answer.

"Carpani added that should Katusha's appeal be successful, seven or eight teams - he was unable to immediately recall the precise number - would have to begin the WorldTour registration process all over again, and that one of those would lose its place, since there can only be 18 WorldTour teams, not 19 which there would be if Katusha were readmitted."

Bit of a mess, isn't it?

And if Katusha do get the licence, and someone else has to drop out, it's another payday for the lawyers...

Avatar
Gkam84 [9086 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

Its pretty simple, Last in first out. Bye bye Argos. Then give them a wild card to EVERY race.  26

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde [1724 posts] 3 years ago
0 likes

Remind me, why did Katusha lose their license? Wasn't it to do with drugs or that there was a suspicion of drugs.