Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Sustrans tells cyclists using Strava and other apps to keep off shared use paths

Charity that runs National Cycle Network reissues code of conduct and underlines that pedestrians have priority

British Cycling and CTC have joined Sustrans in calling on cyclists not to use apps such as Strava that allow them to log personal best times or virtually compete against other riders on traffic free routes that are also used by walkers. Saying that such routes “should be safe and accessible for the entire community,” Sustrans has reissued its code of conduct for the National Cycle Network (NCN), which it develops and maintains, emphasising that cyclists should give priority to those on foot.

The Bristol-based charity’s revision of the code, backed by British Cycling and CTC, follows an incident shown on last week’s BBC One documentary The War on Britain’s Roads in which a cyclist collided with a woman he was passing from behind on a shared use path.

While it can be argued that the woman suddenly stepped sideways without looking behind her and into the path of the cyclist who had altered his line to ride round her, Sustrans’ stance on the issue, made in a tweet immediately the incident was screened and reiterated today through the revised code, is unequivocal – pedestrians have priority at all times.

Nor is it just people on foot who are menaced by cyclists riding too quickly on off-road paths - others on bikes can suffer too, as we reported in October when a woman was knocked off her bike by another female cyclist on the Bristol to Bath Bike Path.

As Sustrans points out, despite its name much of the NCN is on shared, traffic free paths, intended to be used by cyclists, pedestrians and people with disabilities alike. British Cycling and CTC say that cyclists who want to train or ride fast should do so elsewhere, suggesting that they find “appropriate safe routes on rural roads.”

While it is acknowledged that actual incidents on walking and cycling routes is uncommon, Sustrans says that “irresponsible behaviour by a small minority can be unsettling.”

The charity’s chief executive, Malcolm Shepherd, said: “Traffic-free walking and cycling paths help many people get around safely and enjoyably without the need for a car.  They are great for a family walk, teaching a child to cycle or for people with disabilities to get about without the added danger of traffic.

“Unfortunately, a minority of people on bikes choose to speed as fast as they can on these routes, which makes them less safe for everyone else.  These paths are a real asset for the entire community, which is why we want all cyclists to respect this Code of Conduct.

“As cyclists campaign for greater respect on our roads, it’s vital those of us using bicycles give respect to everyone using traffic-free paths.”

The revised Code of Conduct for cyclists on traffic-free paths reads:

* give way to pedestrians and wheelchair users and take care around horse-riders leaving them plenty of room, especially when approaching from behind

* be courteous and patient with pedestrians and other path users who are moving more slowly than you – shared paths are for sharing, not speeding

* slow down as needed when space is limited or if you cannot see clearly ahead

* be particularly careful at junctions, bends, entrances onto the path, or any other ‘blind spots’ where people (including children) could appear in front of you without warning

* keep to your side of any dividing line

* carry a bell and use it or an audible greeting – avoid surprising people, or horses

* however, don’t assume people can see or hear you – remember that many people are hard of hearing or visually impaired

* in dull and dark weather make sure you have lights so you can be seen.
 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

32 comments

Avatar
Giles Pargiter | 11 years ago
0 likes

I must say I feel very ambiguous about some of these routes, for example I not infrequently use the route across N Wales from Bangor to Rhyl. The time it takes me to do this varies (in similar weather conditions, it is E-W along the coast so wind is a big factor) from a little over two hours, at night in winter, to well over three and a half hours, Wkend daytime summer. This route is the only practicable safe way across N Wales for anything other than motorists. So is an international trunk route for cyclists etc.
Despite the recognition of this and tremendous work and endeavour to provide it, it is far from satisfactory as a through route.
The numerous bridges on it seem designed to slow cyclists as much as possible with cost saving sharp and blind corners. In addition many of the seafront sections weave between lamp posts and some of it occupies sections where fisherman put down there rods and leave car doors open (which is at least safer than opening them as you pass). Some of it passes through throngs of crowds on the sea front - especially in summer.
I think the only realistic solution here is to use a lane of the A55 exclusively for cyclists and other long distance walkers etc.

Also as far as I'am aware these routes are public highways; so the highway code applies. Much though I dislike over signage I think this fact should be reinforced - especially KEEP LEFT, as it is often other cyclists wobbling about all over the place who are a problem.
In addition, as a trunk route it should have priority over any other roads crossing it.

I also agree with what others saying, concerning the fact that if you use the road next to one of these routes, it not only tends to make motorists irate that you are not on the cycleway, but more dangerous because there are less cyclists on it.

While I do recognise that, like any other road user, I can't expect to have everything my way. On the other hand they often seem designed pretty much exclusively for dog walkers (with attendant trip wires) and children learning to ride.
Rather than using a cycle as transport.

Avatar
Chainring-Annih... | 11 years ago
0 likes

Again, this is dumping the problem on the poor cyclist (all else being equal).
There is a sign on the path showing that it is 'shared use with cyclists.' Why is it implied that this sign is not for the benefit of pedestrians to know that they, not the cyclist, need to look out for cyclists coming, and not walk or side-step randomly? Or at least simply look before doing so? It really isn't rocket science.
The cyclist is implied to be looking carefully.
Pedestrians, having likely grown-up in a non-cycle-respecting culture, are implied to not care about their part of that 'sharing' responsibility.

Why is this refusal to take responsibility tolerated?
Will our cyclist-hostile culture ever change?

Until we can challenge such irresponsible pedestrians' behaviour, can we at least build proper cycle paths?

They're lovely to use, and when they exist, I for one, give myself no right to use pedestrian facilities, regardless of the law.
When they don't exist, I have less sympathy - but always cycle considerately and look-out for and predict others behaviour, with large safety margins.

Thus I, like I assume many cyclists, take MORE than my fair share of responsibility whilst getting from A to B. So I have no sympathy for those whose slack I'm taking up when they complain...

Pages

Latest Comments