Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Nottingham politicians: Cyclists should be forced to wear helmets and carry lights

MP and councillors to lobby for helmet compulsion bill also want to ban BMX bikes on public roads

Politicians in Nottingham are lobbying for all cyclists to be forced to wear helmets by law, and fix lights to their bikes, following a spate of cyclist deaths in the area.

Nottingham North MP Graham Allen and a number of local councillors are to travel to Westminster next week to make their case on the following points:

 - All cyclists must wear helmets and all bikes must be fitted with lights

 - All new bike sales must include helmets, reflective clothing and lights

 - BMX bikes should be banned on public roads as some do not have brakes or lights fitted, and should be only used on tracks.

 - More training, particularly in schools, and more money for dedicated cycle paths

The delegation will tell Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Hammond, that seven people died on roads in the area this year, compared to two last year.

Graham Allen MP told This Is Nottingham: "These figures are just not acceptable. Cycling may be a green means of transport but steps need to be taken to ensure that cyclists are safe.

"I don't want to discourage cycling and we have some excellent cycle facilities in Nottingham. I want to see more dedicated cycle paths which are traffic-free and safe.

"I believe that we must all be responsible road users; motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. There must be greater awareness among motorists that there are other modes on the roads and they must drive appropriately. Cyclists must be seen. I think these four points coupled with an awareness campaign will have a big impact."

He added: "Our generation used to do the cycling proficiency course at school. We were issued with the Highway Code, tested and got a badge. Whatever happened to that?"

Councillor Ian Morrison added: "The latest trend to sell fixed wheel bikes without brakes is simply immoral."

In Jersey, laws to make helmets compulsory either for all cyclists in public places or just for under-18s were proposed to the island’s parliament, the States, by Deputy Andrew Green, a long-time campaigner for compulsion after his son suffered a brain injury after coming off his bike in 1988 when he was aged nine.

The motion to make it compulsory for all cyclists was defeated by 25 votes to 24, while that in favour of applying it to under-18s was carried by 32 votes to 16.

But in Northern Ireland, a bill to make helmets compulsory ran out of time, amid widespread lack of interest for the move.

Roger Geffen, CTC Campaigns Director told Road.cc: “Neither the DUP nor Sinn Féin – the two biggest parties in the Assembly - were interested in the Bill. The DUP felt that this would be legislation intruding into areas of life where it doesn’t need to go especially as they accepted that cycling is not a particularly dangerous activity. They also took on board our evidence that compulsory helmet use would seriously undermine cycle sales and the cycle tourist industry.

And a study from Norway this year also suggested that mandatory helmet laws actually discourage the safest cyclists in society from taking to the roads.

Meanwhile, Cambridge Cycling Campaign will next week debate whether to withdraw backing for events that promote the wearing of cycle helmets and high visibility clothing, because "the image of cyclists presented to the public has become so strongly skewed towards riders wearing those items that the legitimacy and status of those who do not wear them is being undermined."

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
fictional wilson | 11 years ago
0 likes

Totally agree with thehairs1970's comment.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove | 11 years ago
0 likes

To be fair to the Nottingham politicians in the recent local transport plan (LTP3 http://tinyurl.com/bsog9qr)they are quite honest and state:

The LTP2 period saw cycling levels decline by 3% since 2006 ... Nationally, cycling levels have increased over the same period.

Funding available for both capital (for infrastructure improvements) and revenue (for promotional activities) have been reduced. Given the local decreases in cycling levels and reduced funding levels, the target to reverse this trend and maintain the existing levels over the
next four years is considered challenging

Putting that together with the LTP3 proposal to spend £45m on road improvements, bypasses and the like compared to £450k on 'active travel' in the next three years, obviously the situation isn't going to improve for cyclists in Nottinghamshire and so self protection is the way forward.

Avatar
Bob's Bikes replied to kaska | 11 years ago
0 likes

Kaska, Just thought you might like to know, I used your letter to address my concerns to Mr Allen. His office has responded by not responding, because I don't live in his const. I have replied to this stating that his proposals will affect me and other cyclists directly and think I deserve a reply. Still awaiting an answer.
I have no idea wether others used your letter/got the same brush off or even how you faired (assuming you live in Nottingham) It may be interesting to find out

Bob

Pages

Latest Comments