Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis are "scumbags" says UCI president

So much for truth and reconcilliation? Pat McQuaid lets rip at UCI's ex-doper critics ...

Lance Armstrong should be "forgotten by cycling" said the UCI president, Pat McQuaid yesterday - but the combatitive Irishman revealed that he hasn't forgotten about Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis, the two men whose revelations did most to bring Armstrong down. In the Daily Telegraph he describes the pair as "scumbags".

Given McQuaid's obvious contempt for ex-dopers, especially those that have criticised the UCI over its handling of the problem, it is little wonder that the UCI president seemed yesterday to have little appetite for the setting up of a truth and reconciliation commission - something supported by the USADA - even though it was he who first floated the suggestion earlier this summer. Even if such a commission were set up there has to be some doubt as to how it could actually operate given both McQuaid and the UCI's sensitivity to criticism.

McQuaid's attack on the two riders appears to have been sparked by David Millar's call for the UCI to apologise for its failures over the extent of doping in the sport.  Millar - who came back after serving a ban for doping to campaign for a cleaner sport - has been openly critictical of McQuaid and the UCI.

"They didn’t hold Millar’s hand when he stuck a needle in his backside. He is an adult and they know they are breaking the rules. It’s not the president’s responsibility if they go into a doping programme," said McQuaid.

"Another thing that annoys me is that Landis and Hamilton are being made out to be heroes. They are as far from heroes as night and day. They are not heroes. They are scumbags. All they have done is damage to the sport.”

Earlier this month the UCI, McQuaid and the UCI's ex-president, Hein Verbruggen won a case for defamation against Landis in a Swiss court by default when Landis failed to contest the charge. In December the UCI, McQuaid and Verbruggen go to court again alleging defamation by the ex-Sunday Times journalist Paul Kimmage. The difference on this occasion will be that Kimmage who is backed by a £50,000 defence fund raised by cycling fans, and the journalist will certainly contest the charge.

Kimmage, Landis and Hamilton allege that the UCI accepted a payment totalling $125,000 from Lance Armstrong after the 2001 Tour du Suisse in return for covering up a positive test for EPO. The UCI flatly denies the allegation and says that the test in question was merely 'suspicious' rather than 'positive'. However as the USADA points out in its Reasoned Decision under current testing procedures Armstrong's sample would be classed as a positive - and it was close to positive even by the less precise criteria of 2001.

Interestingly although the same allegation is made by Tyler Hamilton in his book, The Secret Race, the UCI are not taking action against him or co-author Daniel Coyle. However yesterday McQuaid did have plenty to say about both Hamilton and his book.

“We called Hamilton in [after he failed a dope test],” said McQuaid. “He said our machines were wrong. We said ‘we are after you’. He was positive two, maybe three times, eventually he was thrown out of the sport.

"He then spends the next few years trying to prove he was a twin before he was born or something like that and prove the scientific community wrong. He loses his marriage and his money.

"What does he do now? Writes a book just before the USADA report is announced and is making money left right and centre. What good is he doing the sport? He’s on a personal mission to make money for himself.”

The uncomfortable truth for both McQuaid and the UCI is that Hamilton's book and the USADA's Resoned Decision are striking similar in much of what they have to say - indeed USADA endorses the veracity of the book in its Reasoned Decision. Indeed while both Hamilton and Landis were not so long ago both ridiculed for their claims both appear to have been vindicated - as the testimonies in USADA's evidence against Armstrong has proved.

No wonder, some might conclude, that the UCI president wants cycling to forget all about Lance Armstrong.

road.cc's founder and first editor, nowadays to be found riding a spreadsheet. Tony's journey in cycling media started in 1997 as production editor and then deputy editor of Total Bike, acting editor of Total Mountain Bike and then seven years as editor of Cycling Plus. He launched his first cycling website - the Cycling Plus Forum at the turn of the century. In 2006 he left C+ to head up the launch team for Bike Radar which he edited until 2008, when he co-launched the multi-award winning road.cc - finally handing on the reins in 2021 to Jack Sexty. His favourite ride is his ‘commute’ - which he does most days inc weekends and he’s been cycle-commuting since 1994. His favourite bikes are titanium and have disc brakes, though he'd like to own a carbon bike one day.

Add new comment

52 comments

Avatar
Campag_10 | 11 years ago
0 likes

I don't have any sympathy for Landis, Hamilton or McQuaid.

However, as president of a major sport, McQuaid should 100% consistent about wanting the sport he governs to be clean. McQuaid does himself and UCI no favours by defaming Landis and Hamilton – it's unprofessional, bitter and harmful to his and the sport's reputation.

The Armstrong donations to UCI reflect badly and are indefensible. There's plenty of circumstantial evidence to suggest that UCI has been happy to accommodate the dopers – this is a tipping point in the sport and all we are seeing is the vested interests rallying round to keep their snouts in the trough.

Avatar
Alb | 11 years ago
0 likes

How is this plonker still in charge?  20

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 11 years ago
0 likes

I have to say that whilst in general I'm no Pat fan, he is right on this occasion. Hamilton and Landis are scumbags.
Think it through, Hamilton didn't lose his wife and cash fighting the UCI trying to expose the drugs in the sport, he was trying to clear his name.
Once that failed him and Landis did the honourable thing of saying 'well, if I can't play anymore, no one else is going to play either, I'm taking you all with me'. It's the same as a jealous ex throwing acid in the face of his old lover to spoil it for everyone.
These pair were not victims of the doping culture, they were key players... Have no sympathy for them.

Now that said, Pandoras box has been opened, and the future could be brighter because of it... And that's is in part thanks to these spiteful mens attempts to destroy the sport.

Avatar
jova54 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Looks like Pat has finally found his balls. Someone must have told him where Lance left the jar with them in.

You know what they say, "The best form of defence is attack". McQuaid knows he's in for a kicking and he's trying to get his revenge in first.

Hopefully this will be the last hurrah for a man on his way out and who is despised even more than his predecessor because he knew what was going on and ignored the chance to put it right because it would have derailled his gravy train.

Avatar
antonio | 11 years ago
0 likes

Why wasn't he pressed on the fact that he personally spoke to Lance outlining the action forthcoming on the Friday before the official UCI statement on the Monday. 'Sorry Lance but we'll try to mitigate by calling those who ratted Scum Bags'.

Avatar
The Rumpo Kid | 11 years ago
0 likes

The biggest scumbags in all this are the UCI. Festina was an opportunity to clean up the sport, but they just chose to clean up their image. Lance Armstrong, as an English speaker returning from illness, was the ideal poster boy for this project. I agree with just about everything that Landis is not allowed to say and more besides!

Avatar
Brummmie | 11 years ago
0 likes

Spoken like a vile and spiteful little cnut !

"He then spends the next few years trying to prove he was a twin before he was born or something like that and prove the scientific community wrong. He loses his marriage and his money."

This man get's pleasure from ruining one man, yet protects his biggest asset right to the last.

Avatar
PaulVWatts | 11 years ago
0 likes

So who should we support McQuaid the scumbag who in 1976 defied an international ban on athletes competing in South Africa for the money. Or the athletes who have helped expose the hypocrisy of the UCI and the scumbag who runs it?

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 11 years ago
0 likes

McQuaid's comments just go to show that the UCI is still poisoned by the drug legacy. If McQuaid was serious about doing the right thing a truth and conciliation session is the right way forward.

Publicly calling Landis and Hamilton scumbags seems like a foolish and petty thing to do, far from the sort of behaviour you'd expect from a worthy leadership to World cycling. It is for this very sort of thing that McQuaid should step down as it does not appear as if he wants to take cycling forward.

I can see that within professional cycling you might view Hamilton and Landis with little respect, but I actually think that there testimony, along with other riders can start to change things for cycling. If McQuaid botches this and fails to use the momentum then cycling will be mired.

USADA, by bringing Armstrong to book, have sent out a message to cheats that the will not prosper from their endeavours. If Armstrong was allowed to carry on with his charade then the message is that cheaters prosper. At least now riders who do cheat will need to do it on their own and the organisation back up under US Postal will be much harder.

Avatar
Clenbutador | 11 years ago
0 likes

I think he has a point. All dopers are scumbags. But then he should know.....

Avatar
hoski | 11 years ago
0 likes

McQuaid's worse than a clown. He's got that fantastic combination of being both sly and a moron. Well, attempting to be sly anyway. I can't quite understand his actions - they follow no logic whatsoever and make him look wholly unsuitable to head any kind of organisation.

Avatar
georgee | 11 years ago
0 likes

What a clown, let's hope there no investigative journo's out there going through his bins and rummaging up evidence of the man's corruption

Avatar
wingsofspeed68 | 11 years ago
0 likes

"Another thing that annoys me is that Landis and Hamilton are being made out to be heroes. They are as far from heroes as night and day. They are not heroes. They are scumbags. All they have done is damage to the sport.”

I guess it would have all been much better, Mr McQuaid, if we just let it lie and let Armstrong continue his fraud (which looks like it might actually cost him some money now - hope he is bankrupt by the end of the year) ignoring the fact that the sport is dirty and will continue like that until you have someone in charge with some morals!

Hamilton and Landis might not be heroes but at least they had some dignity left to come clean. Armstrong has nothing and I feel embarrassed for all the fops turning up to listen to him. A deluded man with not a hint of a conscience.

Mr McQuaid, if you really love the sport then step down - go gracefully rather than having all the pro-riders calling for your head by the end of next season.

Avatar
livestrongnick replied to wingsofspeed68 | 11 years ago
0 likes
wingsofspeed68 wrote:

"Hamilton and Landis might not be heroes but at least they had some dignity left to come clean"

They didn't come clean, They got caught big time. Because no one else got caught they decided to bring cycling down with them!

Avatar
PhilWalker replied to livestrongnick | 11 years ago
0 likes

Bloody well said!

Avatar
alotronic | 11 years ago
0 likes

I guess we get ten more years for all this to play out... sighs... turns off internet...

Avatar
mingmong | 11 years ago
0 likes

# It's time to play the music

It's time to light the lights ... #

Avatar
Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes

Pat McQuaid is a clown. A terrorist. Like Colonel Gaddafi.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes
Al__S wrote:

Pat McQuaid is a clown. A terrorist. Like Colonel Gaddafi.

Pat McQuaid may be a fool or a clown, but he's not a murderer prepared to use instruments of terror like Gaddafi.

Avatar
cavmem1 replied to Al__S | 11 years ago
0 likes
Al__S wrote:

Pat McQuaid is a clown. A terrorist. Like Colonel Gaddafi.

That has got to be one the stupidest things I have seen recently! You really need to get a grip.
How can you compare a dictator who executed many people with the head (albeit useless, corrupt and unethical)of the UCI.
So please tell me what acts of terrorism McQuaid has committed?

Avatar
drheaton replied to cavmem1 | 11 years ago
0 likes
cavmem1 wrote:
Al__S wrote:

Pat McQuaid is a clown. A terrorist. Like Colonel Gaddafi.

That has got to be one the stupidest things I have seen recently! You really need to get a grip.
How can you compare a dictator who executed many people with the head (albeit useless, corrupt and unethical)of the UCI.
So please tell me what acts of terrorism McQuaid has committed?

I'll refer you to the McQuaid vs Landis defamation case and what Landis is not allowed to say about McQuaid. Read that and then come back.

Link http://road.cc/content/news/68235-swiss-court-finds-favour-uci-landis-de...

To Al__s, excellent use of sarcasm  4

Avatar
cavmem1 replied to drheaton | 11 years ago
0 likes
drheaton wrote:
cavmem1 wrote:
Al__S wrote:

Pat McQuaid is a clown. A terrorist. Like Colonel Gaddafi.

That has got to be one the stupidest things I have seen recently! You really need to get a grip.
How can you compare a dictator who executed many people with the head (albeit useless, corrupt and unethical)of the UCI.
So please tell me what acts of terrorism McQuaid has committed?

I'll refer you to the McQuaid vs Landis defamation case and what Landis is not allowed to say about McQuaid. Read that and then come back.

Link http://road.cc/content/news/68235-swiss-court-finds-favour-uci-landis-de...

To Al__s, excellent use of sarcasm  4

I'll get me coat!
Maybe Al__s is really Landis?

Pages

Latest Comments