Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Record number of lorry drivers fail DVLA medical tests

Screening for drugs, alcohol, sight problems and health issues

A record number of lorry and bus drivers have lost their licences in the last year for health, sight and alcohol and drug reasons, the DVLA has revealed.

4,706 drivers were banned, up around 40 per cent on last year.

Drivers of larger vehicles, who have a Group 2 licence, and are aged over 45 have to pass a DVLA medical examination, which these drivers all failed. Group 2 licences are renewable thereafter every five years to age 65 years unless restricted to a shorter period for medical reasons. The medical standards for Group 2 are much higher than those for regular licences, because of the size and weight of the vehicle.

707 drivers suffered from sight problems, 10 had double vision and 31 could only see out of one eye.

261 were abusers of alcohol and 159 had drug problems.

More than 600 were angina sufferers, 173 had angina, and 227 had had a heart attack.

Road safety minister Stephen Hammond told the Daily Express: “Britain’s roads are among some of the safest in the world and licensing rules have an important role in maintaining this.”

HGVs, large lorries or refuse collection vehicles are involved in two thirds of cyclist deaths in London. Cyclists involved in collisions with HGVs are 78 times more likely to be killed than those hit by a car, and the majority of these deaths happen after large vehicles turn across the cyclist’s path.

Tom Bogdanowicz, campaigns manager for the London Cycling Campaign, told the Telegraph at New Year:

"The data showing the far higher risk of serious injury in collisions with HGVs emphasises the urgent need for all lorry operators, especially councils, to provide specialised awareness training for drivers which is now available as part of the TfL Freight Operators Recognition Scheme (FORS)”, he said.

“It is unacceptable that a third of London councils have still not joined FORS, the quality standard for lorry operators."

Add new comment

8 comments

Avatar
Grumpyoldbiker | 11 years ago
0 likes

This is good news about lorry and bus drivers, but given the apalling standards of driving I see every day in London and the South East it is time they started carrying out a few more checks on all motorists. I'd start with doing a few spot checks on whether motorists are actually wearing the glasses they should be for motoring. I speak to a lot of motorists who seem to think its OK to drive without their glasses, despite the fact that they have been told they should wear them for driving. This could perhaps explain why so many motorists pass me with only a few inches to spare.

Avatar
Coleman | 11 years ago
0 likes

I'm not sure if I should be encouraged by the action taken or scared by the number of drivers who didn't think it might have been a good idea to hand their lorry keys in.

Double vision?!

Avatar
paulfg42 replied to Coleman | 11 years ago
0 likes
Coleman wrote:

I'm not sure if I should be encouraged by the action taken or scared by the number of drivers who didn't think it might have been a good idea to hand their lorry keys in.

Double vision?!

It might make it safer if they have 2 cyclists to avoid.

Avatar
ironmancole | 11 years ago
0 likes

Concerning suspension of a licence following medical issues does anyone else find the following a touch odd?

Holders of the regular driving licence or PCV can have their licence indefinitely suspended or revoked by DVLA for certain health issues (such as newly diagnosed epilepsy until the medication is correctly calculated) in order to ensure no-one is killed and quite right too.

In contrast when a 'healthy' driver does actually kill someone 'accidentally' (such as when the car drives itself at 80mph and forces the driver to pick his phone up and update his facebook page :''() they are given at best a fixed and very much temporary suspension then allowed to get on with it, business as usual as we see far too much.

Based on the above logic any lorry driver who has failed a medical should argue that as they haven't killed anyone (yet) they should be allowed to drive as those who have already 'accidentally' slaughtered another human being are not prevented from driving in the way that they are. Am I missing something here or is this just more 'allow the motorist to do whatever they please' government thinking?!!

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 11 years ago
0 likes

Good use of a photo too - skippers and tippers have a particularly high accident record

Avatar
Sarah Barth | 11 years ago
0 likes

You're right, Gkam, it's lorries and buses rather than HGVs. Thanks.

Avatar
Gkam84 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Correct me if i'm wrong here, But you can only hold a HGV if you past your test in 1992 or before, otherwise it would be a LGV

Bus drivers pass a different test, they do a PCV (Passenger Carrying Vehicle)

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/Drivingforaliving/Drivinglorriesbus...

I know a number of bus drivers with PCV's who have suffered a heart attack in the past and still pass their medical to driver a service bus for Stagecoach.

Then on the other hand, a close family friend had his medical for Stagecoach last week. Because of certain circumstances in his life recently, he's been under alot of stress. His blood pressure was high and he has been given two weeks off to sort things out and see if his pressure comes down.

So I don't know about these figures above as they are quoting for HGV which is out dated  39

Also, new regulations coming in for medical standards next year.

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/DriverLicensing/DG_201207

Avatar
londonplayer | 11 years ago
0 likes

"4,706 drivers were banned, up around 40 per cent on last year." GOOD!

Latest Comments